Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Exhaust Back pressure

  1. #1
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is offline VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default Exhaust Back pressure

    Well I just got my pacemakers installed today (in 44 degree heat, not soo good haha) and I was talking to a mate and an apprentice mechanic and they said my exhaust system would make me lose power because there is not enough back pressure.

    All it is is the extractors, stock cat and a 2.5 inch pipe all the way back to the tip. No muffler or resonator (as far as I can remember). I've searched a couple of old threads, couldn't find a specific answer. So all I'm asking for is whether that sort of system is fine, both EPA legally and performance wise. If not then I'll most likely go for a Lukey Ultra-Flow muffler and chuck that on. Suggestions?

    Not interested in a full on debate or criticism about exhausts, I've read and contributed to my fair share of those threads. Straight answers please.
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  2. #2
    Stressball's Avatar
    Stressball is offline Rolling on 4 again :D
    Ride
    Mitsubishi Triton

    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    SE QLD
    Posts
    319

    Default

    He's wrong. You don't want back pressure. You want the correct flow for the gasses to retain their heat and therefore velocity. Too small creates backpressure and as such, restrictions on the engine. Too large allows the gasses to cool and therefore lose velocity, creating another restriction. You want the right size for the right engine. General consensus on here seems to be that 2.25" or 2.5" are good for an NA 6.

    As long as the exhaust is quieter than whatever the ADR is, 93dB or something...? It meets that regulation; EPA-wise, I'm not sure. They can be pretty strict, you may be better off talking to them yourself.

  3. #3
    Ride
    VT spac super6

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Riverton sa
    Posts
    826

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stressball View Post
    He's wrong. You don't want back pressure. You want the correct flow for the gasses to retain their heat and therefore velocity. Too small creates backpressure and as such, restrictions on the engine. Too large allows the gasses to cool and therefore lose velocity, creating another restriction. You want the right size for the right engine. General consensus on here seems to be that 2.25" or 2.5" are good for an NA 6.

    As long as the exhaust is quieter than whatever the ADR is, 93dB or something...? It meets that regulation; EPA-wise, I'm not sure. They can be pretty strict, you may be better off talking to them yourself.
    A key point missed there is too little backpressure you wont get exhaust "flow" and the heat wont be removed from important places like valves resulting in burnt valves...

    but in saying that you should be able to run extractors on their own and not get that problem..

    you might lose some low end power but less likely to lose in the higher rev range

  4. #4
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is offline VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HARVZ-6 View Post
    A key point missed there is too little backpressure you wont get exhaust "flow" and the heat wont be removed from important places like valves resulting in burnt valves...

    but in saying that you should be able to run extractors on their own and not get that problem..

    you might lose some low end power but less likely to lose in the higher rev range
    That was my original thought, too little backpressure, which is also what my mates were saying. I'm still just a little concered about the noise level (it is barely that loud at the moment) but mostly concerned about making sure there is enough back pressure, not too much, but not too little as to ensure maximum performance.

    If that is the case, (I'm going to ring an exhaust shop to be doubly sure, be good to get you guys' opinions as well) I was considering as I said before, adding a Lukey Ultra-Flow muffler, and maybe a Magnaflow Cat as well, or maybe a medium 5" resonator instead of the muffler.

    Any thoughts?
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  5. #5
    Ado's Avatar
    Ado
    Ado is offline Are we there yet?
    Ride
    vsII statesman L67

    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    337

    Default

    Dont know about back pressure but i can tell you that if you have no mufflers fitted it will fail an epa test.
    Are we there yet?

  6. #6
    Haydz's Avatar
    Haydz is online now 346 cu/in
    Ride
    VS UTE LS1 T56

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Liverpool.Sydney,NSW
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    get a muffler on a 6 or a resonator if it were an 8.


    and you should at least have one muffler. legally you should have both a muffler and a resonator.

  7. #7
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is online now Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,095

    Default

    Back pressure is bad in any situation. It just loads up the engine and makes it work harder.

    Exhaust velocity is what you need. Extractors achieve this better than any exhaust system on it's own can. The reason they are called extractors is they 'extract' exhaust gas from the cylinders. As each exhaust pulse travels down the header tube it creates a low pressure point behind it, as this pulse passes through the collector it draws the next pulse in the firing order out of it's header tube. All these pulses need to maintain a certain velocity as they travel along the exhaust system to help draw the next pulse along behind it.

    Once the exhaust gas cools it takes up less space, so to keep the velocity going, you will need to reduce the size of the exhaust pipe the further you go from the engine. Too small and it creates a restriction thus causing back pressure. Too large and the cooler exhaust loses velocity and the pulses behind it bank up and end up pushing the exhaust out, this is back pressure too.

    A 2 1/2" cat back system really needs a smaller tail pipe to maintain good velocity and reduce back pressure. People confuse back pressure with velocity, thinking that they are adding back pressure and increasing engine performance, but what they are doing (sometimes) is keeping velocity.

    Restricting the exhaust can give the impression of more power, but all you are doing is throwing in more fuel so it feels like there is an increase in performance.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  8. #8
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is offline VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_An_Abba_Fan View Post
    Back pressure is bad in any situation. It just loads up the engine and makes it work harder.

    Exhaust velocity is what you need. Extractors achieve this better than any exhaust system on it's own can. The reason they are called extractors is they 'extract' exhaust gas from the cylinders. As each exhaust pulse travels down the header tube it creates a low pressure point behind it, as this pulse passes through the collector it draws the next pulse in the firing order out of it's header tube. All these pulses need to maintain a certain velocity as they travel along the exhaust system to help draw the next pulse along behind it.

    Once the exhaust gas cools it takes up less space, so to keep the velocity going, you will need to reduce the size of the exhaust pipe the further you go from the engine. Too small and it creates a restriction thus causing back pressure. Too large and the cooler exhaust loses velocity and the pulses behind it bank up and end up pushing the exhaust out, this is back pressure too.

    A 2 1/2" cat back system really needs a smaller tail pipe to maintain good velocity and reduce back pressure. People confuse back pressure with velocity, thinking that they are adding back pressure and increasing engine performance, but what they are doing (sometimes) is keeping velocity.

    Restricting the exhaust can give the impression of more power, but all you are doing is throwing in more fuel so it feels like there is an increase in performance.
    You answered everything I wanted to know mate. Much appreciated
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  9. #9
    Ride
    VT II S pack

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    102

    Default

    Who installed if for you haym? I wouldn't worry too much about the EPA man, unless it's ridiculously loud. I'd just chuck on a muffler to be safe though.

  10. #10
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is offline VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    Daalder Exhausts in Box hill mate, on corner of Station st and Albion rd.

    It's not ridiculously loud, it isn't really that much louder than it was before, it doesn't drone, it just sounds deeper and it warbles. I'm actually quite impressed with the note. It was more the issue of back pressure I was interested in...

    However, down the track I might chuck on a new Magnaflow Cat and a Lukey Ulta Flow muffler. If needed. Or I might just wait until I'm off my P's, stop spending money on this car and wait for my VS Clubsport.
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  11. #11
    Ride
    VT II S pack

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    102

  12. #12
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is offline VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    What chip are you getting mate? I'm going for a Delcowizzid tune (guy off this forum). What were you thinking of?
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  13. #13
    Ride
    VX SS II 6.3L/M6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_An_Abba_Fan View Post
    Back pressure is bad in any situation. It just loads up the engine and makes it work harder.

    Exhaust velocity is what you need. Extractors achieve this better than any exhaust system on it's own can. The reason they are called extractors is they 'extract' exhaust gas from the cylinders. As each exhaust pulse travels down the header tube it creates a low pressure point behind it, as this pulse passes through the collector it draws the next pulse in the firing order out of it's header tube. All these pulses need to maintain a certain velocity as they travel along the exhaust system to help draw the next pulse along behind it.

    Once the exhaust gas cools it takes up less space, so to keep the velocity going, you will need to reduce the size of the exhaust pipe the further you go from the engine. Too small and it creates a restriction thus causing back pressure. Too large and the cooler exhaust loses velocity and the pulses behind it bank up and end up pushing the exhaust out, this is back pressure too.

    A 2 1/2" cat back system really needs a smaller tail pipe to maintain good velocity and reduce back pressure. People confuse back pressure with velocity, thinking that they are adding back pressure and increasing engine performance, but what they are doing (sometimes) is keeping velocity.

    Restricting the exhaust can give the impression of more power, but all you are doing is throwing in more fuel so it feels like there is an increase in performance.
    Wow great post mate.

    Little off topic, but would my exhaust be causing a restriction?

    Its a 6.3L LS1 with Pacemaker Extractors 4 into 1s (3") with a 3" section into dual high flow cats (4.5" body, 100cpsi) then going back into a 2.5 twin system (full stainless steel). I was worried that it was 2.5" after the cats, but by this post would that be an advantage?

    Engine is making around 330rwkw. Is it worth upgrading to dual 3" system?

    Cheers

    (Sorry for hijacking)

  14. #14
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is online now Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,095

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by feistl View Post
    Wow great post mate.

    Little off topic, but would my exhaust be causing a restriction?

    Its a 6.3L LS1 with Pacemaker Extractors 4 into 1s (3") with a 3" section into dual high flow cats (4.5" body, 100cpsi) then going back into a 2.5 twin system (full stainless steel). I was worried that it was 2.5" after the cats, but by this post would that be an advantage?

    Engine is making around 330rwkw. Is it worth upgrading to dual 3" system?

    Cheers

    (Sorry for hijacking)
    If you want good dyno figures put the 3" twin on as dynos like a big exhaust. For street drivability and punch off the line, keep your 2 1/2".

    You will find your top end improve a bit with the 3" but you will lose low end torque as what you are doing is losing a bit of exhaust velocity. I would keep what you have.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

Similar Threads

  1. red cat back exhaust
    By ned in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 68
    Last Post: 16-11-2009, 10:52 PM
  2. back pressure
    By VL Berlina 5speed in forum General
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 19-07-2009, 03:09 PM
  3. Cat Back Exhaust for VT V6
    By HamaTime™ in forum V6 Development And Modification
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 10-05-2008, 05:07 PM
  4. exaust back pressure
    By MR50VK in forum V8 Development and Modification
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 15-01-2007, 08:35 PM
  5. back pressure
    By Stretchomatic in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-09-2005, 09:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71