Okay, So Ive blew up the engine of my 'daily' I currently have no car.. and Im using mums car.. shes not liking the idea..
Im looking at spending $1000 + to fix the car. Now with saying that, I think I could spend about the same and get my Kingswood running. As much I want the kingswood running.. but when it was last running it was really Thirsty.. Last time my mum can remember it used a fuel tank to travel 200k's and it was out of fuel pretty much. (cant be to sure how correct this is.. could of said empty on gauge) from what I know.. It has a 63litre tank? That's almost 31.5Litres per 100k! now thats double of what my commodore uses. I use alot of petrol in the commodore... so IF I was to get the kingswood back on the road.. will I be expected to see a fuel guzzling machine if I took it down to a carby tuner and get my carby tuned properly?
Id be happy with around 18Litres per 100k but 31 is too much..
So would it be possible to get a fuel efficient 253 v8 with a good tune? - Dont say.. oh you'll never get fuel economy with a old v8.. but is it possible to get atleast 20L per 100k from it?
Thanks..
With a new /rebuilt carby and everything else in good order id say its possible depends onhow you drive another to consider is the gearbox is it auto or manual?
Originally Posted by Smidy
I've got a 253 3sp auto and 3.08 diff, combined I'm getting an average of 20l/100km, I've got it as low as 18 and it hasn't gone past 22 only difference is mines quite tight, Holley carb that I tuned, and a rooted exhaust, so I could see less. But also my speedo shows 7% less than I'm traveling, so its better again.
:O that's not to bad, only a few litres from my what my commodore uses... What kind of holley carb you got on it?
$1000 to spend on fixing a commodore isn't really worthwhile when you can pick up another commodore for under a grand if you really look for them.
If your 253 is worn, then you can't expect much from it. If it's a really tight engine and well tuned then yes you can get pretty close to your 18L/100 klm.
My VH SS get's around 21L/100 klm and is bored 40 thou decked 30 thou with flattops and a mild cam.
My VQ stato reads it's avg as 31.9L/100klm and that's unfortunatly including a couple of decent trips recently (not happy with it TBH) and that's a tight engine but stock tune.
Ive already spent it.. + 2000 more. aha. pos car.
So 18l/100k seems to be a average for the old 253's?
I think average for a stockie is about 20-25l/100km as and auto with 3.08 gears, the maul I think should get less, I got down to 18 driving easy on long stretches with the occasional squirt and overtake. It's best economy is about 80-90kph.
I've got a leaky 350 Holley. I'll eventually upgrade to 4brl inlet with Rochester and tune that, should give a bit more power.
Also, being my speedo is out 7%, it should be about 17l/100. Possibly less I'd like to think. Sedans, statos coupes and wagons had 74 litre tank, while the utes, vans and robbers had 84