View Poll Results: Power or looks?

Voters
52. You may not vote on this poll
  • Power

    20 38.46%
  • Looks

    8 15.38%
  • Even mix

    22 42.31%
  • Neither, save money for next car

    2 3.85%
  • Candy (other)

    0 0%
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 33

Thread: Performance or looks?

  1. #1
    Ride
    VX SS II 6.3L/M6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    833

    Default Performance or looks?

    Hey guys,

    Tried to find a similar poll without much luck. Just wanted to know whats more important to you, performance or looks?

    Originally i was very bais towards more power before looks. I hated the idea of a "all show, no go" but recently ive changed opinion a little.

    I do love a car with awesome performance but with the boys in blue being so strict its harder and harder to use the power.

    Ive recently spent a lot of money on my car making it look good (rims, lowered, resprayed, exhaust, window tint etc) but not too much increasing performance (new ECU, CAI, exhaust).

    What do you reckon? (yes, ideally both but if your not bill gates what would you choose?)

    Cheers, Errol.

  2. #2
    minux's Avatar
    minux is offline Infidel Bear
    Ride
    300rwkw FG G6ET/2011 Sti Spec R Hatch
    Mini Putt 2 Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    6,879

    Default

    Performance all the way. Even if it isn't engine mods, suspension mods, brake mods etc, all makes the car so much better.

    Anybody can have a car that looks ok, having it stop,turn and go is the key factor.
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
    - Theodor Seuss Geisel



  3. #3
    dufus is offline Donating Member
    Ride
    rickshaw

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    1,572

    Default

    Without a doubt performance, but a car should also look nice so maybe a nice set of wheels to go with the performance mods.

  4. #4
    Ride
    VX SS II 6.3L/M6

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    833

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minux View Post
    Performance all the way. Even if it isn't engine mods, suspension mods, brake mods etc, all makes the car so much better.

    Anybody can have a car that looks ok, having it stop,turn and go is the key factor.
    Good point, probably should have been more clear on my poll. When i said "performance" i was talking about raw bhp. In my case lower suspenion, wheels, exhaust all add to the "performance" of the car, although dont add power (exhaust might add a little).

    Cheers for the input.

  5. #5
    Reaper's Avatar
    Reaper is offline Tells it like it is.
    Ride
    E3 Senator Manual, VP SS

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    SE Suburbs, Melbourne
    Posts
    4,470

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by feistl View Post
    Good point, probably should have been more clear on my poll. When i said "performance" i was talking about raw bhp. In my case lower suspenion, wheels, exhaust all add to the "performance" of the car, although dont add power (exhaust might add a little).

    Cheers for the input.
    Raw HP is a wank unless you can put it to the ground which requires the whole package.

    Reaper

  6. #6
    Ride
    VZ SS 6 SPEED MANUAL

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    WA
    Posts
    421

    Default

    Performance for me to and i agree with bill_randomhero about the wheels to go with it...

  7. #7
    Ride
    VS Commodore Omega

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    3,213

    Default

    If we were talking about general upgrades which make the car better but don't add raw kw (suspension, wheels etc.) I would have went mix, but I chose looks as I'm not chasing kw, it can be a very expensive game

  8. #8
    nicko's Avatar
    nicko is offline Carbon Positive - DO IT!!
    Ride
    75 cruiser ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    sa
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    i like performance, though i voted for even mix.

    i define rims are performance becuase there is no way a 215/65 r15 is going to handle as well as a 245/45 r 17. looks good and you get a bit of performance out of it.

    but i hate people putting massive wings and stickers all over there car because i dont even class that as increasing looks
    no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone

  9. #9
    Ride
    1995 HSV Clubsport T5, 1991 VN Berlina

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by M5VT2 View Post
    i define rims are performance becuase there is no way a 215/65 r15 is going to handle as well as a 245/45 r 17. looks good and you get a bit of performance out of it.
    s
    depends what kind of driving youre doing. im sure you wouldnt class 22 inch rims as performance

    1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
    Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
    1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
    9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD




  10. #10
    nicko's Avatar
    nicko is offline Carbon Positive - DO IT!!
    Ride
    75 cruiser ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    sa
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    lol yeh no joke ;

    thats why i only went from a 15" to a 17" in my example.
    no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone

  11. #11
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Performane and looks i like both as a package but at the end of the day not every one can afford stinking big v8's, turbo charged engines and the like.

    Everythink Takes time,there is no race for who has the best,quickest and largest rwkw.

    Any one can have power and massive rwkw if they are 1. A mechanic by trade or have some knowlege to do it them selves.2. Have saved for it.3. In Debt paying back the bank.4 Inherited it from family. 5. Hava A good paying job.

    Wouldn't worry about looks if the car drives like a semi go performance but dont expect alot from a six without a bit of money which would be better off into another car with more technolgy eg alloytec or v8. If you must keep the vr get the mechanics and safety aspects sorted then worry about some rims,17" rims will increase the handling of the car,they are cheap now and if ur doing alot of hard driving they will leave the taxi rims behind.

    I voted for buy a next car as if ya want real performance the 3.8L just wont hit it. You are waisting ur time if you want real performance without forced induction.
    Last edited by RVN 355; 07-02-2008 at 05:47 PM.
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

  12. #12
    Ride
    1995 HSV Clubsport T5, 1991 VN Berlina

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RVN 355 View Post

    Wouldn't worry about looks if the car drives like a semi so performance but dont expect alot from a six without a bit of money which would be better off into another car with more technolgy eg alloytec or v8. If you must keep the vr get the mechanics and safety aspects sorted then worry about some rims,17" rims will increase the handling of the car,they are cheap now and if ur doing alot of hard driving they will leave the taxi rims behind.
    how does a car have more technology just because its got a v8 over a v6?
    Quote Originally Posted by RVN 355 View Post

    I voted for buy a next car as if ya want real performance the 3.8L just wont it it.
    well you cant really say that. there are a few 3.8L powered cars making more power than a lot of 5 litres will make

    1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
    Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
    1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
    9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD




  13. #13
    minux's Avatar
    minux is offline Infidel Bear
    Ride
    300rwkw FG G6ET/2011 Sti Spec R Hatch
    Mini Putt 2 Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    6,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    how does a car have more technology just because its got a v8 over a v6?


    well you cant really say that. there are a few 3.8L powered cars making more power than a lot of 5 litres will make
    Not without FI lol.
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
    - Theodor Seuss Geisel



  14. #14
    Ride
    1995 HSV Clubsport T5, 1991 VN Berlina

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minux View Post
    Not without FI lol.
    haha yeah but theyre still making the power though

    1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
    Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
    1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
    9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD




  15. #15
    davey g-force's Avatar
    davey g-force is offline I'm a sceptic...
    Ride
    Phantom MY09 VE SSV A6 & Holden Cruze CDX M5

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    "...the winner is..."
    Posts
    2,126

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    ...there are a few 3.8L powered cars making more power than a lot of 5 litres will make

    Quote Originally Posted by minux View Post
    Not without FI lol.
    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    haha yeah but theyre still making the power though
    Oh gawd, not this argument again!
    Quote Originally Posted by CSP (aka Rufys) View Post
    Look, all the update is going to be is like going from VX to VY or VY to VZ. Same car with different front/rear ends and updated interior. But it will be the VF, not the VE II.
    ^^ ^^


  16. #16
    Ride
    VP Executive R-spec

    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7,910

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    haha yeah but theyre still making the power though
    Are they really or is it the blower/turbo making the power

  17. #17
    Ride
    VP SS

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Hiding in WA somewhere
    Posts
    446

    Default

    EVEN MIX no point having a car that loks great but has no performance and no good having heaps of performance in car that looks like crap

  18. #18
    Ride
    vp executive

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    lakes entrance VIC
    Posts
    233

    Default

    my car is going dam hard (when i get injector's) but look's like crap stocky's with vr acclaim hubcaps, faded paint, ding's every where, standard height
    its already one of the quickest commodores in my town so bout time i make it look good
    definetly a mix i hate cars that are show but no go
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
    Screw the icecream...

    Who wants a moustache ride?

  19. #19
    Cobez's Avatar
    Cobez is offline LS-EXUAL
    Ride
    2004 S2 VY SS Ute

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,095

    Default

    I like performance mods, but i lean more towards looks. After i took care of suspension etc and all my brakes etc are working fine and maintained, i started on cosmetic stuff.

    I'd prefer a nice clean wicked looking cruiser as opposed to a quick / fast car.
    Quote Originally Posted by wikky
    As already stated, mate you're an absolute gherkin strummer.

  20. #20
    Wagon_Wheel's Avatar
    Wagon_Wheel is offline Drop A Patch....
    Ride
    Blown VS Clubsport, VP Wagon Daily

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Mt Martha, Vic
    Posts
    1,590

    Default

    At the moment im all about going fast, but thats only cause i think my car looks good stock.
    But if it were an exec or somthing i would do the usual looks things like rims lowerd etc etc.
    Thinkin cam in a few weeks

  21. #21
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    how does a car have more technology just because its got a v8 over a v6?

    well you cant really say that. there are a few 3.8L powered cars making more power than a lot of 5 litres will make

    Alloytec man high output,esp,abs etcc in newer cars,better safety,comfort and ride. Its a given man the buick is old school 30year old design and out dated.


    True v6's can do decent times but with massive turbos /blowers and cash but kw to dollar the v6 guys spend more to get power,really how many over 150kw 3.8L buicks are there here on the forum?
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

  22. #22
    Ride
    1995 HSV Clubsport T5, 1991 VN Berlina

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    5,037

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by RVN 355 View Post
    Alloytec man high output,esp,abs etcc in newer cars,better safety,comfort and ride. Its a given man the buick is old school 30year old design and out dated.


    True v6's can do decent times but with massive turbos /blowers and cash but kw to dollar the v6 guys spend more to get power,really how many over 150kw 3.8L buicks are there here on the forum?
    well mines above 150kw for one thing. i was talking about how you said the v8 has more technology than the v6. i assumed you were talking about engines available to a certain model, such as a 5L versus the 3.8

    1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
    Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
    1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
    9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD




  23. #23
    Ride
    '92 HSV VP GTS

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    2,069

    Default

    All depends on what your canvas is. If tour starting with a HSV, then performance all the way, if its an old VL, then looks aswell as power.

  24. #24
    Ride
    Subaru Liberty

    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    195

    Default

    Neither. My car was bought purely to get me from A to B via a road/combination of roads. My next car, when I am off my P's, may be different.

  25. #25
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stocky View Post
    well mines above 150kw for one thing. i was talking about how you said the v8 has more technology than the v6. i assumed you were talking about engines available to a certain model, such as a 5L versus the 3.8
    Probably because you got a blower. The 5 litre has more technolgy than the buick and its aussie made. most v6 even ecotecs dont exceed that power figure
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. vl performance
    By farris in forum VL Holden Commodore (1986 - 1988)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 27-03-2007, 01:19 PM
  2. Help with performance
    By VUkeS in forum V6 Development And Modification
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 27-07-2006, 03:06 PM
  3. performance 202
    By The_Fallen_One_05 in forum Straight 6 Development And Modification
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 29-06-2006, 05:48 PM
  4. LMG performance
    By Tom04 in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-03-2006, 09:05 PM
  5. performance
    By bretto16 in forum VL Holden Commodore (1986 - 1988)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 22-08-2005, 08:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71