Power
Looks
Even mix
Neither, save money for next car
Candy (other)
Hey guys,
Tried to find a similar poll without much luck. Just wanted to know whats more important to you, performance or looks?
Originally i was very bais towards more power before looks. I hated the idea of a "all show, no go" but recently ive changed opinion a little.
I do love a car with awesome performance but with the boys in blue being so strict its harder and harder to use the power.
Ive recently spent a lot of money on my car making it look good (rims, lowered, resprayed, exhaust, window tint etc) but not too much increasing performance (new ECU, CAI, exhaust).
What do you reckon? (yes, ideally both but if your not bill gates what would you choose?)
Cheers, Errol.
Performance all the way. Even if it isn't engine mods, suspension mods, brake mods etc, all makes the car so much better.
Anybody can have a car that looks ok, having it stop,turn and go is the key factor.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
Without a doubt performance, but a car should also look nice so maybe a nice set of wheels to go with the performance mods.
Good point, probably should have been more clear on my poll. When i said "performance" i was talking about raw bhp. In my case lower suspenion, wheels, exhaust all add to the "performance" of the car, although dont add power (exhaust might add a little).
Cheers for the input.
Performance for me to and i agree with bill_randomhero about the wheels to go with it...
If we were talking about general upgrades which make the car better but don't add raw kw (suspension, wheels etc.) I would have went mix, but I chose looks as I'm not chasing kw, it can be a very expensive game
i like performance, though i voted for even mix.
i define rims are performance becuase there is no way a 215/65 r15 is going to handle as well as a 245/45 r 17. looks good and you get a bit of performance out of it.
but i hate people putting massive wings and stickers all over there car because i dont even class that as increasing looks
no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
lol yeh no joke ;
thats why i only went from a 15" to a 17" in my example.
no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone
Performane and looks i like both as a package but at the end of the day not every one can afford stinking big v8's, turbo charged engines and the like.
Everythink Takes time,there is no race for who has the best,quickest and largest rwkw.
Any one can have power and massive rwkw if they are 1. A mechanic by trade or have some knowlege to do it them selves.2. Have saved for it.3. In Debt paying back the bank.4 Inherited it from family. 5. Hava A good paying job.
Wouldn't worry about looks if the car drives like a semi go performance but dont expect alot from a six without a bit of money which would be better off into another car with more technolgy eg alloytec or v8. If you must keep the vr get the mechanics and safety aspects sorted then worry about some rims,17" rims will increase the handling of the car,they are cheap now and if ur doing alot of hard driving they will leave the taxi rims behind.
I voted for buy a next car as if ya want real performance the 3.8L just wont hit it. You are waisting ur time if you want real performance without forced induction.
Last edited by RVN 355; 07-02-2008 at 05:47 PM.
Cheers.![]()
* RVN 355 *
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
EVEN MIX no point having a car that loks great but has no performance and no good having heaps of performance in car that looks like crap
my car is going dam hard (when i get injector's) but look's like crap stocky's with vr acclaim hubcaps, faded paint, ding's every where, standard height
its already one of the quickest commodores in my town so bout time i make it look good
definetly a mix i hate cars that are show but no go
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Screw the icecream...
Who wants a moustache ride?
I like performance mods, but i lean more towards looks. After i took care of suspension etc and all my brakes etc are working fine and maintained, i started on cosmetic stuff.
I'd prefer a nice clean wicked looking cruiser as opposed to a quick / fast car.
Originally Posted by wikky
Alloytec man high output,esp,abs etcc in newer cars,better safety,comfort and ride. Its a given man the buick is old school 30year old design and out dated.
True v6's can do decent times but with massive turbos /blowers and cash but kw to dollar the v6 guys spend more to get power,really how many over 150kw 3.8L buicks are there here on the forum?
Cheers.![]()
* RVN 355 *
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
All depends on what your canvas is. If tour starting with a HSV, then performance all the way, if its an old VL, then looks aswell as power.
Neither. My car was bought purely to get me from A to B via a road/combination of roads. My next car, when I am off my P's, may be different.