Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: the relation between revving your car and fuel economy?

  1. #1
    Ride
    vs 96 acclaim

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    96

    Default the relation between revving your car and fuel economy?

    is it really worth granny footing your car around 1700-1900rpm each gear then to drive it up around 2000-2500rpm....is the fuel saving any much better?

  2. #2
    88GreenVN's Avatar
    88GreenVN is offline On sick leave
    Ride
    88 Green VN Wagon 400,208kms

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Deep South - VN Country
    Posts
    6,490

    Default

    My V8 hates 60kph. uses heaps more fuel getting to 60 slowly (15 to 16 L/100). I use moderate throttle to get up to speed. Cruising at 100 to 110kph gives the best economy (around 11 L/100)from the V8.

    As for a V6 - cold starts are a killer on fuel. Again moderate throttle gets the best economy for my cars.
    White 05 V6 VZ Executive - Thrashed Ex Telstra car
    and 2 Dangerous non ABS VN's

  3. #3
    Ride
    VL Berlina turbo, VL SL turbo ~STOLEN~

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Newcasstle
    Posts
    507

  4. #4
    Morton's Avatar
    Morton is offline For external use only
    Ride
    Fairstar the Funship

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,097

    Default

    Also depends on what the traffic is like If you know you're going to spend a while at or above 60, get there moderately fast. If you know there's another twenty sets of red lights ahead, you're probably better off being a granny and coasting up to each set of lights.
    __________________________________________________

    The 1972 HQ Kingswood
    __________________________________________________


  5. #5
    nicko's Avatar
    nicko is offline Carbon Positive - DO IT!!
    Ride
    75 cruiser ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    sa
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    i have often wondered this, my digital fuel usage thingo says that when im going up a hill in 4th gear it uses say 15L per 100 but if i drop it back to 3rd and keep the same speed (60km) i will use 11L per 100. the harder u have to put the accel down the more fuel its going to use, sometimes having more revs but using less accel is going to use less fuel
    no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone

  6. #6
    Morton's Avatar
    Morton is offline For external use only
    Ride
    Fairstar the Funship

    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    4,097

    Default

    This is very true, as the car uses less effort (has more torque at the appropriate revs) to get where it's going. I often find, for example, that it's good to keep the car in third under 60kph.
    __________________________________________________

    The 1972 HQ Kingswood
    __________________________________________________


  7. #7
    Wagon_Wheel's Avatar
    Wagon_Wheel is offline Drop A Patch....
    Ride
    Blown VS Clubsport, VP Wagon Daily

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Mt Martha, Vic
    Posts
    1,590

    Default

    Yeah, mines pretty bad around town, but i dont care, i give it stick through the gears, i dont see the point in striving to save 2-4 ltrs per hundred k's, meh.
    Mines MINT on the freeway, about 8ltrs/100k's, wont be after i change the diff though lol

  8. #8
    vlv8vic's Avatar
    vlv8vic is offline <---Brad Quaid = internet stalker
    Ride
    M5

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    3,774

    Default

    I know it isn't a commodore but i've tested this with the camry. If i flog it i lose about 50k's on granny speed. Just changing at the right times and not flooring it.
    Not as fun though.

  9. #9
    Ride
    vs 96 acclaim

    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    96

    Default

    yeah i thought it would be a pretty good topic to bring up...as im only getting around 300 city kms, ive tried granny driving n just my normal style of driving which seems to get a bit further of a tank...i just always thought the less you revved the better economy u get...i guess not

  10. #10
    nicko's Avatar
    nicko is offline Carbon Positive - DO IT!!
    Ride
    75 cruiser ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    sa
    Posts
    1,435

    Default

    yeh its a tricky one!! as is said alot on this forum if your getting poor economy try some injector fluid, pump the tyres up to about 40psi, get the car serviced and tuned etc. my mate in his VT S2 Spack would get better economy when he had his car in power mode due to the car being able to use its torque better rather than creating the power with excess fuel
    no longer a hoon by association - the commodore is gone

  11. #11
    Ride
    HSV +6

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Mornington Peninsula
    Posts
    771

    Default

    I know that if i dont granny it but dont flog it i get best economy.

    If im too light or too heavy on the accelerator its usually a bit of a guzzle.

  12. #12
    Ride
    VT SS 5.0

    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Seaford, Melbourne
    Posts
    309

    Default

    I find if I granny it I get roughly the same K's as giving it a bit to say 3000rpm. When i flat stick it thats when it starts guzzling.

  13. #13
    commsirac is offline Banned
    Ride
    vx

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    The faster the engine revs, the more fuel it will use.....(thats why we have things like overdrive etc), unless severely labouring the motor....going uphill in top gear at 60km/h would be labouring the motor.

  14. #14
    savage1987's Avatar
    savage1987 is offline fail champion
    Ride
    LS1 VN + 304 VN + WK Grange 0010
    Blackjack Champion!
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Townsville
    Posts
    3,611

    Default

    On a side note, a lot of Gen III manuals go really well if you can keep shifting at 1500rpm. This makes for hell slow driving (using throttle position 1 or 2) but they have a well designed combustion chamber that seems fairly useable down low. I got a standard VY SS manual to run under 10L/100km through moderate traffic in town

    Interesting topic though, some good info. I'll stop granny driving my 5L now, thank you
    Sam
    WTB: mulberry VN interior parts

    I also build computers. PM me if you are considering a new desktop PC.

Similar Threads

  1. Fuel Economy Per Tank Of Fuel
    By HoZy in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 57
    Last Post: 25-06-2012, 02:55 PM
  2. Fuel Economy Per Tank Of Fuel
    By HoZy in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 108
    Last Post: 03-09-2010, 03:29 PM
  3. Fuel economy per tank of fuel
    By HoZy in forum VL Holden Commodore (1986 - 1988)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-05-2007, 05:58 PM
  4. Fuel Economy Per Tank Of Fuel
    By HoZy in forum VB - VK Holden Commodore (1978 - 1985)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 05-05-2007, 08:39 AM
  5. Fuel Economy Per Tank Of Fuel
    By HoZy in forum VY Holden Commodore (2002 - 2004)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-05-2007, 08:01 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92