Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: drag from wind for a ute

  1. #1
    Ride
    VY S2 SS ute

    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    82

    Default drag from wind for a ute

    hey guys,

    was just wondering if people can clarify this for me as i have heard both sides, if i drive my ute with no cover on it what so ever does wind enter into the tub a cause drag? cheers.

    Con

  2. #2
    CANYONERO's Avatar
    CANYONERO is offline Likes Cheese...
    Ride
    V8 6spd wif MOMO leavaa.

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Country SA
    Posts
    1,032

    Default

    i would say so, when i had my ute i had the tonneau on with no bracing in the middle it used to get a massive sag at higher speeds wicked for cornering! but i later had the hard top.

  3. #3
    Ride
    VY SV8 HBD---mmmm LS1
    Simon Champion! On The Volley Champion! Shootin Hoops Champion! Batting Champ Champion!
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Western Suburbs
    Posts
    1,292

    Default

    well myth busters proved that by having the drop down tray at the back up actually works better then leaving it down less drag when its up so having the cover on wanted make that much difference

  4. #4
    TVR-190's Avatar
    TVR-190 is offline SkyFall
    Ride
    WK Statesman LS1

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sutherland Shire N.S.W
    Posts
    2,063

    Default

    i think they would be designed to be relatively the same with or without it
    The Black Beauty



  5. #5
    commsirac is offline Banned
    Ride
    vx

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Conn View Post
    hey guys,

    was just wondering if people can clarify this for me as i have heard both sides, if i drive my ute with no cover on it what so ever does wind enter into the tub a cause drag? cheers.

    Con
    Its more the flow around the cabin wont be as smooth, rather than air being trapped by the back. Its not only the shape of the front of the object that affects aerodynamics but that of the rear surfaces as well. My best guess would be that the cover would achieve a smoother flow than the open area.

    If the difference is signficant, you should be able to see the difference, ie top speed the vehicle gets to, which might not be practical to test.
    A more practical test might be to get it up to 140km/h or so, take your foot of the gas and see how long it takes to slow down to 120km/h.

  6. #6
    minux's Avatar
    minux is offline Infidel Bear
    Ride
    300rwkw FG G6ET/2011 Sti Spec R Hatch
    Mini Putt 2 Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    6,879

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by commsirac View Post
    Its more the flow around the cabin wont be as smooth, rather than air being trapped by the back. Its not only the shape of the front of the object that affects aerodynamics but that of the rear surfaces as well. My best guess would be that the cover would achieve a smoother flow than the open area.

    If the difference is signficant, you should be able to see the difference, ie top speed the vehicle gets to, which might not be practical to test.
    A more practical test might be to get it up to 140km/h or so, take your foot of the gas and see how long it takes to slow down to 120km/h.
    Every method was tested on mythbusters...it was proven that the best fuel economy is no cover and tail gate up.
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
    - Theodor Seuss Geisel



  7. #7
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,095

    Default

    The area behind the vehicle is a low pressure area. The air flow over the cab and into the tub is a high pressure area. High pressure areas flow into low pressure areas. Any "parachute" effect caused by the tailgate will be canceled out by the air movement from the high pressure area in the tub to the low pressure area behind the vehicle. The faster you go, the faster this movement is, you can't outrun fluid dynamics. The low pressure area behind the vehicle is greater than the high pressure in the tub. So the movement of this air actually creates less resistance.

    You have to get over what your eyes tell you, just because there is a physical barrier there doesn't mean it creates a resistance.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  8. #8
    commsirac is offline Banned
    Ride
    vx

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by minux View Post
    Every method was tested on mythbusters...it was proven that the best fuel economy is no cover and tail gate up.
    ??, ok, so most likely no cover is the go.

    But they did this test with commodore utes?

    or brick like aerodynamics on a pickup truck,
    Have looked it up, the tailgate findings make sense and I am in agreement with the theory, but couldnt find much about the cover findings?
    All the same, the testing method was simplistic, driving two vehicles until they run out of gas, good television but good testing procedure?(using ~200L of fuel to get a finding is not a very smart way of doing it, and 3-4hours of driving), did they do any controls here, like drive both vehicles with the tailgates up and establish that they both run out of fuel at the same time? (whch would have used another 200L of fuel...if they did it)


    Regardless, it would be a big call to apply their findings to every vehicle, it doesnt take much visually to get a big change, which is why I suggested actually doing a very basic test to find out with the vehicle at hand( and it wouldnt need 200L of fuel either)
    Last edited by commsirac; 09-08-2008 at 12:28 AM.

  9. #9
    commsirac is offline Banned
    Ride
    vx

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_An_Abba_Fan View Post
    The area behind the vehicle is a low pressure area. The air flow over the cab and into the tub is a high pressure area. High pressure areas flow into low pressure areas. Any "parachute" effect caused by the tailgate will be canceled out by the air movement from the high pressure area in the tub to the low pressure area behind the vehicle. The faster you go, the faster this movement is, you can't outrun fluid dynamics. The low pressure area behind the vehicle is greater than the high pressure in the tub. So the movement of this air actually creates less resistance.

    You have to get over what your eyes tell you, just because there is a physical barrier there doesn't mean it creates a resistance.
    Yeah, nice theory/rhetoric, but was is your prediction on whether the cover will slow it down or not?

  10. #10
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,095

    Default

    If I had access to a wind tunnel I would test my "theory/rhetoric", but as I only have my limited knowledge of fluid mechanics and aerodynamics to go by, I stand by it.

    In "theory", the cover will only deflect airflow and not create the low pressure area inside the tub. The low pressure area behind the vehicle will then, in fact, act as a parachute in itself. You will need to have some sort of flow interrupters on the rear of the cover to create turbulence to lessen the low pressure behind the vehicle.

    Bernoulli's principle states that an increase in speed of a fluid occurs at the same time as a decrease in pressure. Applying this principle to a vehicle in motion is what brought me to the conclusion that the tail gate up is the best for economy.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  11. #11
    TVR-190's Avatar
    TVR-190 is offline SkyFall
    Ride
    WK Statesman LS1

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sutherland Shire N.S.W
    Posts
    2,063

  12. #12
    Jesterarts's Avatar
    Jesterarts is offline Your freedom ends where mine begins
    Ride
    2005 HSV Z R8 Manual

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mornington, VIC
    Posts
    3,142

    Default

    Umm.. we all do realize that in the end we are talking about very very small margins right??

    I think in the end having a hard lid or not wouldn't have much of an effect.

    In the end the biggest motivator woudl probably be... do I like the look of a hard cover, a soft cover or open tray...

    And to answer the original questions in brief...

    No, it will not cause any EXTRA drag...

    Cheers

  13. #13
    commsirac is offline Banned
    Ride
    vx

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,183

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesterarts View Post
    Umm.. we all do realize that in the end we are talking about very very small margins right??

    I think in the end having a hard lid or not wouldn't have much of an effect.

    In the end the biggest motivator woudl probably be... do I like the look of a hard cover, a soft cover or open tray...

    And to answer the original questions in brief...

    No, it will not cause any EXTRA drag...

    Cheers
    Im in the not sure camp.....Its not totally clear from the person posting the enquiry whether they have a cover already, but my initial thoughts were yes and that's why I suggest doing a very basic test to find out. To state categorically that the difference will be small or that there is no difference solely based on speculation is incredulous.

  14. #14
    Ride
    VH and VT S2 Berlina ecotec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane-northern suburbs
    Posts
    292

    Default

    if theres no extra drag from having no lid then do that cuz it be alot lighter than a hard cover.

  15. #15
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,095

    Default

    To answer the OP's question specifically, no, it will not cause drag.

    Here you go, http://ecow.engr.wisc.edu/cgi-bin/ge...hi1/pickup.pdf an actual test that proves it. Sorry about the file size.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

Similar Threads

  1. VR VS wind deflector
    By adixon in forum General
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 26-01-2008, 03:46 PM
  2. Wind noise on VE's?
    By rmatt in forum VE Holden Commodore (2006 - ?)
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 07-05-2007, 08:30 PM
  3. WTB Rear wind screen
    By fatboy2869 in forum Swap / Wanted to Buy / Trade
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-04-2007, 10:02 AM
  4. Wind Noise !!
    By AlX in forum VY Holden Commodore (2002 - 2004)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 25-04-2006, 07:40 AM
  5. Wind Noise????
    By holdensupporter2005 in forum VY Holden Commodore (2002 - 2004)
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 10-03-2006, 08:52 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71