has anyone heard anything? i hope they dont, im really having my heart set on getting a V8 vs/vr stato
Dont Take Life Too Seriously, You Never Get Out Alive Anyways.
2002 Series II VX SS - 6spd - 5.7L - Black - Red Leather <3
They have been saying that for years, and they were talking about making it so you needed a permit to drive a high powered car such as a v8
Speed never killed anyone. Suddenly becoming stationary, now that's what gets you...
If it does come in, like all the other states, it will only apply to NEW licence holders. If your already on your P's, you'll go by the conditions that were set when you got your license.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * [] [VP CALAIS INTERNATIONAL] [EFI 304] [T56] [] * *
* * [] [VP BERLINA LX WAGON] [EFI 304] [T5] [] * *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEALTHY's Shed Clean Out! Buy my ****
Originally Posted by davway
Originally Posted by JONNNNOOOOO!!
I am not convinced that a V8 is necessarily more powerful than say a V6 in an R32 or (previous model) M3 or the straight 4s in the Evo X and WRX STI. Each is a dangerous weapon in the hands of an inexperienced driver.
yeh, the old holden 6's, done up right they go better then V8's
Dont Take Life Too Seriously, You Never Get Out Alive Anyways.
2002 Series II VX SS - 6spd - 5.7L - Black - Red Leather <3
No officer my 427 v8 is legal on my P's, when im wearing my sumo suit![]()
I think he could be talking about a VW R32
Restrict them to 4 banger FWD's
Worst thing you can do in them is put maccas trays under the back wheels, put the hand brake on and drive around on school ovals.
lol, ahhh the good old days, i mean. OMG thats so immature![]()
yeah but it doesn't matter what engine you have in a car they can be just as dangerous
Chev badges are an instant fail
All the more reason that if a law is to be introduced it is done so based on something more representative of power like cubic capacity or kw output and not the number of cylinders.
A 5L VS is still faster than a V6 VE though?
I would rather see them in the slower vehicle with the airbags and ESP and other safety features than the faster car with a sloppy chassis and no safety feature other than seatbelts and ABS.
How would cubic capacity be much different to the number of cylinders. You would think a cubic capacity would cut off anything 4L and above, which is only really V8 anyway, and I don't see how cubic capacity is more representative of power than the number of cylinders. The same goes for pure kw output. A 190kw VE isn't quicker than a 165kw VN SS. Power to weight ratio is the most accurate way of doing it.
On a side note, I would assume it would be V8 and turbo/supercharged vehicles. So WRX, turbo skylines etc. would be ruled out as well.
Thread derailed much!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * [] [VP CALAIS INTERNATIONAL] [EFI 304] [T56] [] * *
* * [] [VP BERLINA LX WAGON] [EFI 304] [T5] [] * *
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
STEALTHY's Shed Clean Out! Buy my ****
Originally Posted by davway
Originally Posted by JONNNNOOOOO!!
Based on cc I would expect the threshold to be 3000 or even less. Most P platers drive Hyundai Excels anyway don't they?
Based on number of cylinders we would see P platers unable to drive their grandad's twenty-year old V8 but allowed to drive their mum's GTI.
Power to weight would come a cropper for small engined small cars like the Mini Cooper.
Power to weight is the most efficient way (without it getting overly complicated) of measuring a cars acceleration or 'pace' for lack of a better word.
So you would rather see cubic capacity come in and stop people driving any sort of commodore or falcon in Australia? Restrict a considerable amount of the population from buying any current Australian made vehicle?
doesnt matter what they drive, ive towed fatals where its been vw's and fiat's to commodores... all comes down to the driver themselves...
[QUOTE=1991_Vn2nV;1119846]A 5L VS is still faster than a V6 VE though QUOTE]
I think the new SV6 might actually be faster than the old 5L. The SV6 has a 195kw 3.6L engine don’t forget.
Come on let's not get things out of proportion. Both 'Australian' car makes Holden and Ford make more than just V8s and engines over 3000cc. In fact these are the minority in their range. Take a look at the roads and you will see more Japanese and other imported cars than our so-called home-grown cars and most of them are under 3000cc and straight fours.
"Considerable amount of the population" - I think not. We're talking about P platers.
Ermm ok so name 1 car made by Holden or 1 car made by Ford Aus at this present time that is fitted with an engine under 3000cc? Not sure where you're living but in this country Holden only make the Commodore and Ford only make the Falcon and Territory
Considerable does not mean majority, P platers are a significant chunk of the driving population.
The VN 5 litre went 15.1 on the 1/4 mile in wheels magazine with driver + passenger full load of fuel etc. At the drags any VN-P 5 litre in decent running condition can cut a high 14. Try that in a VE V6 sometime. Like VN2NV said more torque, lots less weight you don't have both those in your favour and loose in acceleration
Last edited by greenfoam; 25-04-2009 at 07:43 AM.