Vr vs

[gen3]

just want to know which one is better please vote then comment which one u votted for and y cheers

[fkford]

vs mainly because i have one haha but pretty much because its an upgrade from the VR just better thought out less faults e.g VT VX..and i wud rather the ecotec to the buick

[White Tiger]

vs mainly because i have one haha but pretty much because its an upgrade from the VR just better thought out less faults e.g VT VX..and i wud rather the ecotec to the buick

+1 for me

[MikesCalais]

VS. minor changes make them look HEAPS better. Plus their newer, which IMO (MY!!! opinion... OPINION!!!!!) means better. Especially in the case of older models, make sense? hopefully

[Fonzie]

Definitely the VS. Newer, Better engine, And as Mike said: Heaps of little changes that make things better. One thing I noticed randomly the other day, doing some work on a mate's VR, is that he's got a spot for the key on the passenger door as well as driver side.

[Reaper]

There is a difference?

Reaper

[thedeadwalk]

There is a difference?

Reaper

+1

[ethann]

Vr =D
Cause I have one =)

[ParkwayDrv]

vs cos they have the gts-r which is one of my fave commo's

[sweefu]

vs for ecotec and bit newer

[CAMZVS]

VS cause ecotec is a better engine

[What The]

VS cos i'm on my 3rd one, had a VR BT1 with the buick motor and a fair bit of work done and always got done by stock VS' plus the ECOTEC sounds tuffer

[fuzzy2308]

LOL there both over rated clunks of crap but in saying that VS id better than VR

[VKCOMMO]

I was going to make a thread the exact same as this back on tuesday

[gen3]

i think vr because it has a better gearbox (manual) the vr has a t5 and the vs has a getrag .... i helped the oldman replace a clutch and fly wheel in one. the guy we got the parts from says the getrags come out with a shit clutch from new . need replasing like every 6mounths (if driven everyday every ware) .. but i could be wrong

[neet_wagon]

VR because I have one.
And because the ecotec is a gay POS (yes i own one, in a vx)
No-one gives the good'ol buick a chance. theres no way the ecotec is the better engine (opinion!!)

[_R_J_K_]

i think vr because it has a better gearbox (manual) the vr has a t5 and the vs has a getrag .... i helped the oldman replace a clutch and fly wheel in one. the guy we got the parts from says the getrags come out with a shit clutch from new . need replasing like every 6mounths (if driven everyday every ware) .. but i could be wrong

The S1 VS came out with a T5 setup. The S2 VS had a Getrag box, hydraulic clutch, and a dual mass flywheel.

[ryno_vrx]

i voted vr.... not because i own one and not because my vr berlina beat my mates vs ss but for the simple idiotic fact i like the letter R lol

[Pos]

Yes I do own a VR, the reason for voting VR Over VS is the same reason I own one of these far gone beauties!!!! With the 5l model you can have a late model fuel injected V8, reasonably light weight, NO airbag systems unless it was optioned & ditto with ABS. I like to work play & mod my car myself & I don't want that stuff getting in the way costing more because it's needed to keep the car legal on the road....PFFFT to that BS!!!!

[ParkwayDrv]

id rather have abs, airbags etc, and vs has the better looking steering wheel and badges

[holdendude]

Well i voted for VR, because i own one with the T5 gearbox and i reckon the old Buicks go harder for longer! and dont have all that crappy stuff like the vs does, just nice & simple =D
Just my opinion

[benoit]

i have a vr ss and vs v6. i voted vs because my v6 is heaps faster then my ss

[savage1987]

i have a vr ss and vs v6. i voted vs because my v6 is heaps faster then my ss

Something is very wrong with your SS if they are both stock.

[benoit]

only thee ss is stock not for long though

[holdendude]

Something is very wrong with your SS if they are both stock.

Agreed