NOOOOO!!!! bigger is better! AHA
Commodore to get 3.0-litre V6 - www.drive.com.au
I reckon it'll be the 3.0 DI LF1 which is 190Kw.
Last edited by Sphinx; 07-06-2009 at 02:12 PM.
NOOOOO!!!! bigger is better! AHA
if you can get almost as much power out of a 3 litre then go for it. DI make a big difference.
di is really good, the 3.6di used in over sears by gm is making 220kw i believe
Well if you are going to build big slugs you may as well make one that doesn't use so much fuel![]()
they're using the 3.6 litre version in the 2010 camaro and it's good for 305HP. Not bad for a 6.
Caddy will have this lineup so hopefully Holden get that LLT motor. http://caddyinfo.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=21505
Last edited by Sphinx; 07-06-2009 at 06:23 PM.
In addition to a more efficient motor, Holden REALLY need to look at making a lighter car![]()
__________________________________________________
The 1972 HQ Kingswood
The 1989 VN Turbo Rally Project
__________________________________________________
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
Interesting, same power, less fuel, me likey
Thats all right, thats ok, I drive a commodore anyway!!!!
too bad if i wanted to fit a set of extractors to that motor
I dare say the filter also looks like its an awkward spot to.
Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise
here's the 3.6 litre version rated at 227kw. read that this motor uses a cartridge style filter that looks like it's a little lower than the one on the 3.0 litre.
humm that serpentine belt looks like it would be a bitch to change
GROSS
There is no replacement for displacement. I have only ever owned two cars. One is 5Litres other is 3.8Litres. :P
I own an Commodore, therefore, I own the road
Oh how i love rear wheel drive
if it puts out the same amount of power and uses less fuel then i cant see many disadvantages........or maybe im not looking close enough![]()
The way i see it going from the ecotec to the alloytec you needed alot more revs to go places do dropping engine sizes again regardless of di in such a fat assed car is going to need even more revs. Not terribly smart
Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise
that LLT motor is a basic copy of what the vz/ve use, although the heads and inlet manifold are different to accommodate the DI they make 227kw and 367nm? on 87 octane fuel, with an economy of around 9.2L 100km
that 3.0 motor is an alloytec derivative but is suited to fwd, so i doubt that will be used in the commo as it is staying rwd for much longer
EASTERN CREEK JCNSW 2009
Originally Posted by Commydoor
I wouldn't have a problem with them using the 3.6di donk because it would totally shit all over previous holden 6's, if they go with the 3ltr that would be gay
Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise
I own an Commodore, therefore, I own the road
Oh how i love rear wheel drive
......................
EASTERN CREEK JCNSW 2009
Originally Posted by Commydoor
I own an Commodore, therefore, I own the road
Oh how i love rear wheel drive