Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Power to wieght ratio. Ute or Sedan?

  1. #1
    VzVzVz's Avatar
    VzVzVz is offline <<< My Ride
    Ride
    VZ S ute

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Port Melbourne
    Posts
    392

    Post Power to wieght ratio. Ute or Sedan?

    I understand that in the VZ, the sedan SV6 is equipped with the 190 alloytec to compensate for the extra wieght of a sedan. But, is it enough to beat the power to weight ratio of the 175 S ute?

    I'd love to know because I'm curious as to why the VZ S ute was not equipped with the beefier engine.

  2. #2
    ashbox's Avatar
    ashbox is offline 6 speed
    Ride
    VZ SS 6 Spd

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Car
    Posts
    1,080

    Default

    towards the end of the vz range they introduced the sv6 ute with the ho 190kw motor and 5spd auto, so as to why they didn't do this in the beginning i've got no idea...
    Chev badges are an instant fail

  3. #3
    TVR-190's Avatar
    TVR-190 is offline SkyFall
    Ride
    WK Statesman LS1

    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Sutherland Shire N.S.W
    Posts
    2,064

    Default

    SV6 (kg): 1592

    details are sketchy cause only ute weight i can find is the ss at 1613kg
    The Black Beauty



  4. #4
    Ride
    FG XR6T Ute manual

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brissy
    Posts
    714

    Default

    They are pretty much the same weight anyway
    Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise

  5. #5
    Ride
    FG XR6T Ute manual

    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Brissy
    Posts
    714

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TVR-161 View Post
    SV6 (kg): 1592

    details are sketchy cause only ute weight i can find is the ss at 1613kg
    according to redbook (also sketchy) is the vz sv6 is 1592 and the vz s is 1574 but im sure my rego sticker on my old vz s ute said more than that (again to be taken with a grain of salt)
    Chuck Norris destroyed the periodic table, because he only recognizes the element of surprise

  6. #6
    VzVzVz's Avatar
    VzVzVz is offline <<< My Ride
    Ride
    VZ S ute

    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Port Melbourne
    Posts
    392

    Default

    I'm having a look on Drive.com and when you value your car, it gives details as follows.

    VZ S ute 2005's kerb weight is 1540kg. Power to weight 8.80:1 (kg/kw)

    VZ SV6 sedan 2005's kerb weight is 1592kg. Power to weight 8.38:1 (kg/kw)

    Power to weight ratio in the Sedan is better than the ute, but only by a bit. I must admit, I'd love to have the 190kw alloytec in my car, but I'm completely happy with what I've got.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 24-10-2009, 11:49 AM
  2. big cam and 1.8 ratio non ecotec will make more power?
    By holdenrocks in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 20-06-2009, 08:57 PM
  3. power to weight ratio..........
    By HÝPÕ-5L in forum VN - VP Holden Commodore (1988 - 1993)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 31-03-2007, 04:26 PM
  4. High ratio rockers low end power???
    By spice weasel (BAM) in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 03-01-2007, 01:30 PM
  5. power to weight ratio?
    By Xfordman in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 29-08-2005, 12:25 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71