I think Johnny is right about Australia shouldn't agree to Kyoto untill it is either ratified or a more realistic and binding agreement is reached which includes the major industrial nations that are missing from Kyoto (USA, China, India ect). Fluro lights seem like a silly
PR stunt, which like most policy related election stunts, it is. It does gather some merit, they last longer, they use far less power (meaning the existing power can be better managed/conserved/distributed) and in the end, they cost business and household less money in the long run. What is so bad about that?
May I add, fluro light bulbs alone aren't gonna save our arses from sh!t, but it is a positive first step. However much larger steps, and with greater frequency need to occur sooner rather than later if everyone is serious about fixing our own environmental mess.
Clean coal, Nuclear, Hydrogen technology, forest rehabilitation, water desalination/recycling and an internationally binding carbon trading/credit scheme will be the only way to fix this on an international level. However, I doubt the credibility and effectiveness of an international watchdog, by definition, the UN has failed on most fronts since Korea 1956...