as the title suggests, who do YOU think is the worst?
I think its Alfa Romeo for 3 reasons.
1. Pedals are WAAY to close together.
2. All old ones and some newer one are the biggest Sl*t's to wheel align.
3. They dont seem to be very reliable cars as a few people i know have them and they've had nothing but problems
We got rep back, yaaay!
FSM for the deplorable Fiat 126 clone called Niki...
If ignorance is bliss why aren't there more happy people around ?
honda integra, not due to the fact that their un reliable or anything, im just sick of little boys driving them crazy with neons, clear lights, big bore, hard core type R stickers, race spec automatic and of course a bodykit that makes it have 4X the factory surface area
apart from that their not to bad lol
Japanese scientists have created a camera with such speed that they now can photograph a woman with her mouth shut!
DeLorean!!
Promised champagne and delivered overpriced,flat,lemonade.![]()
Did look kinda cool in Back to the Future tho,I must admit![]()
*waits for somebody to say ford*
ummm but by what ive "heard" fiats and alfa's are POS's and should be taken off the road![]()
Fiats are bad as you have to have weight in the car to do it properly. I think the Ford Galaxy LTD is the worse car I have ever aligned, the top control arms are on slots and you can only adjust them with it jacked up. The pedals are close because they are designed for racing shoes not work boots lol.
Lada and Leyland. I hate the P76 and the Sumatra.
I always thought Alfa Romeo and Jag were in competition for many years to make the most unreliable cars in the world. Both have made some of the most *magnificent* body shapes ever to grace the roads. Pitty most were broken down on the sides.
As others have mentioned, the soviet Lada's would have to go close to being the all round worst cars ever produced.
Reaper
Gemini.... I HATE em!
SsangYong all their cars look hideous.
Lada. I was bought a Niva that would just cut out while you were driving it.
hyandai for its tribune.
excels and the getz are fun little cars but the tribune, nope.
attn Über geeks, i play Second life. Patrio Graysmark.
any car company that is more interested in making generic cars for profit rather than building a proper car
1995 Manual HSV Clubsport
Wade Cam :: 9.2:1 CR :: Pacemaker headers :: Twin 2.5" Exhaust :: VT Brakes
1991 Supercharged VN Berlina
9 PSI SC14 Intercooled :: Genie headers :: Twin cats :: HM Twin 2.25 exhaust :: 3.45:1 LSD
vaxuall viva, triumph 2500, and the 70's renaults *shudders*......
my grannys have a kia mentor. it has been reliable but the build quality seems very rough. very plasticy and tacky. but like i said... it has been reliable.
there is also a people mover whose name escapes me, terrible looking thing. one of those random Korean builds i think...
Hyundai Trajet???
SsangYong - I was waiting for someone to say it but I've been beaten to the call..
Proton - Don't get me started, Malaysian car manufacturer... Bleh...
Every Charade should be forcibly taken from the road and crushed to made into dog food cans..
I think anything made in Korea rates pretty high, simply because these cars are built to a price, rather than a standard.
I know there are a fair few people who will say hyundai aren't so bad now, but they're still cheap imported s**t. end of story.
aren't the Fiat 126 and FSM niki the exact same car, built in different sheds? I thought they were
WTB VR/VS FACTORY HEADUNIT BRACKETS PM MEOriginally Posted by MY-42-VT
at the top of the list dihatsu, followed by kia, suzuki, daewoo, hyundai
there are plenty of better alternatives to a cheap new car and those certainly shouldent be one of them
most of them cheaper euro cars vauxhal opel and all them r poo and anythin malysason(spelling) also mitsi magnas hate em wif a passion