Register - Members List - Calendar - Mark Forums Read -

Go Back   Just Commodores > Main > The Pub

The Pub Talk about anything not relating to cars or Commodores in general.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18-09-2007, 10:37 PM
ultimate warrior's Avatar
have an ultimate day
 

Ride: VS yall
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bunbury
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 508
ultimate warrior Hitchhiker
Default horsepower for clevo 351?

thinkin of investing in a XD 351 goz they go like tha wind n sick 1s look tuff as ****.. any know how mcuh power they put out
__________________
I bury those cokroaches!

Last edited by minux; 19-09-2007 at 07:36 AM. Reason: Language
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote

Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 18-09-2007, 10:51 PM
JD's Avatar
JD JD is offline
In a commodore once again
 

Ride: 1992 VP V6 5spd & 1988 VN Wagon
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Morphett Vale, SA
Posts: 1,669
JD Statesman
Default

according to this 300BHP
The Ford 351 Windsor & Cleveland Engine Specs
__________________
STATESMAN!!! Now to be a Caprice! help me get there by rewarding me for my excellent posting skills!

Life's better with a Manual Commodore!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 19-09-2007, 12:29 AM
Wombat's Avatar  

Ride: VX-II Lumina Sedan
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluff, Queensland
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 414
Wombat Calais
Default

You ain't gonna like this....

Those figures on the link do show up to 300hp, but there is no way on Gods green earth that a standard Clevo 351 in an XD is going to put out that.
The horrifying truth is that, because of increasing anti-pollution which really knocked all the V8's around back then, that a VS with a stock Ecotec will just about walk away from a stock 351 XD-XE Falcon.
I have a Wheels magazine with the last of the 351 Fairmont ESP Ghia's in it, up against a VH SS Commodore. The 351 only puts out a measly 170-odd kw...but don;t think the SS was anything to crow about...it only put out about 200kw from the 308 V8 at the time, and that was "modified".
Oh yes, the torque was great, but power was waaaaay down on the glory days of the XY GT and similar cars.
Just look at the column on the far right showing the ordinary and extremely common 2V 351 (good luck finding a 4V nowadays...a good 4V engine would probably cost as much as a good complete XD Falcon...)... it only put out 250hp in 1969-1970, and a pitiful 177hp in 1971 to 1973...now, realise that this was BEFORE the big anti-pollution laws in 1976, which lowered the power even more, and you know what I'm talking about...sad isn't it... and a bigger shock when you translate those pitiful horsepower figures into kilowatts...remember what I said about a stock Ecotec...

If you are prepared to mod it, there should still be guys around who know thier ways around a 650 Holley and some head and cam work...whack a Top Loader behind it and give it a good paintjob with some nice rims, and you'll have a great classic car which still looks the goods.

...just don't expect much from a bog standard anti-pollution-equipped 351, that's all. (especially fuel economy...yikes!)
Most car magazines, after the anti-pollution laws of '76, even stopped quoting power and economy figures...the manufacturers knew they had knobbled great cars with crap that possibly made them a little cleaner, but knocked around the fuel economy and power output something shocking.

Last edited by Wombat; 19-09-2007 at 12:40 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 19-09-2007, 01:03 AM
minux's Avatar
We will remember them.
 

Ride: 'Enhanced' Y Series Senator Sig
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Geelong
Trade Rating: (1)
Posts: 5,617
minux Off the chartsminux Off the chartsminux Off the chartsminux Off the chartsminux Off the chartsminux Off the charts
Default

You could be really different and make an awesome mod.

351 clev in the front of the car but because those ugly 3 tonne tanks are symmetrical you could go a nice boss setup in the rear, make it all wheel drive, steering wheel on each end and no one will ever know!!!
__________________

minuxx dot net

--------------------------------------------------

Buy my Prints below




Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 19-09-2007, 01:57 AM
bezz's Avatar  

Ride: vz
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: adelaide
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 562
bezz Berlina
Default

yea wouldnt really be buyin something like that to go fast... cars like that should just be a cruiser. I bet most new 4cyl buzzboxes could outperform the 289 clev in my xr... i still know what i'd rather be driving
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19-09-2007, 04:45 AM
bangers's Avatar
<<<There's a good present
 

Ride: EL FALCON XR6
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: NSW
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 1,419
bangers has disabled reputation
Default

do you want to know a cheap trick to getting more power? put 302 rods in it, no word of a lie. i know a bloke who builds performance engines (he just did a twin turbo 5 litre VL) and he can build a motor for those for less than $5000 that will put out @600BHP with around 800foot/pound of torque (he's already done one in a ZJ fairlane). he tried talking me into doing it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19-09-2007, 09:51 AM
PaRaDoX's Avatar
White Rider
 

Ride: MKIII Supra Turbo Manual 3.0L Targatop
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Eastern Suburbs, Victoria
Trade Rating: (2)
Posts: 2,985
PaRaDoX Caprice
Default

welll, over the last 3 months we've had a range of diffrent fords at my house, including a 1970 windsor 302 in a ZC, that was mildly worked and felt like a good 150rwkw (big carby+inlet)

either way we got rid of that and now we have a clevland 302 in a XE ute, i drove that and it felt quicker altho being stock probbly because the cars lighter, either way the stock 302 feels like 200hp @ fly sooooo i doubt the 50 cubic inches gives the engine another 100hp, soo i reckon 250hp max for the 351, id reccomend a twin exhust if you do tho, the zc we had sounded insane, just 1 muffler on each exhust sounds absolutely insane

but yeah 250hp would be my estimate, either way its not going to be stupid powerful but enough to give you a good kick in the balls
__________________
Rice rice baby...
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...rga-supra.html

FOR SALE:
1x 28 Spline Tight LSD $300
1x 80L Drop tank $200
4x FE2 IRS V8 springs $50
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19-09-2007, 10:14 AM
Wombat's Avatar  

Ride: VX-II Lumina Sedan
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluff, Queensland
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 414
Wombat Calais
Default

There is another option if you can bear to do without a V8...

My son and I are sketching out a couple of plans for a project we'd like to do...one option is a Valiant Charger, but they are fetching rediculous prices, and it isn't really preferred at the moment.
The other is a bit more applicable to what you are doing. You can actually get a good solid mid-60's Mustang which needs a paint job without motor or box for well under $20,000...combine this with an early BA Falcon twin-cam six out of an XR6 with either the six speed manual or five speed auto...should be plenty around at wreckers by now...combine the two and mix well.

Failing that, a well done up XD Falcon with a V8 out of a new BA Falcon wouldn't be a bad thing either...

...or you could be really different and slap in a 6 liter LS2 out of a Commodore...that'd certainly raise a few eyebrows...
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 19-09-2007, 10:25 AM
ultimate warrior's Avatar
have an ultimate day
 

Ride: VS yall
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: bunbury
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 508
ultimate warrior Hitchhiker
Default

mmmm the only thinhg i wouldnt like bout the 351 is a 5.8L would like to drink a lot of fuel. paradox how bad was it?
__________________
I bury those cokroaches!
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 19-09-2007, 07:32 PM
pandaman's Avatar
Aussie Muscle Fan
 

Ride: VN Berlina 5.0 A4
Join Date: Feb 2006
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 779
pandaman Caprice
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bezz View Post
yea wouldnt really be buyin something like that to go fast... cars like that should just be a cruiser. I bet most new 4cyl buzzboxes could outperform the 289 clev in my xr... i still know what i'd rather be driving
Just to nitpick, the 289 in your XR would be a windsor wouldn't it? Unless you've done something very strange with a cleveland block.
__________________
Beau Duke: Man, I'm never gonna get outta this car again. I'm gonna live in it, I'm gonna eat in it and I'm gonna make sweet love to it!
Luke Duke: You mean you're gonna make sweet love IN it.
Beau Duke: Oh no, I'm gonna have sex with it.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 19-09-2007, 08:16 PM
bezz's Avatar  

Ride: vz
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: adelaide
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 562
bezz Berlina
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pandaman View Post
Just to nitpick, the 289 in your XR would be a windsor wouldn't it? Unless you've done something very strange with a cleveland block.
ah yes bit of a mix up there, XRs had a 289 Windsor. When we bought it we were told it was a cleveland engine, however on closer inspection its definitely a 302 Windsor (XT engine). All good for us as we are building an XT GT replica
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 20-09-2007, 10:26 AM
Wombat's Avatar  

Ride: VX-II Lumina Sedan
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Bluff, Queensland
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 414
Wombat Calais
Default

Fuel economy...hmm...not really a word I recall being used in connection with a 351, or any V8 for that matter, back in the late seventies and early eighties...
Big bent eights, especially post-July 1976 when ADR-27A came in (the birth of anti-pollution), are notoriously bad on fuel...I am talking sometimes nearly a third worse after anti pollution gear was fitted.
Also, as I said, the power figures were mysteriously dropped from nearly all car magazines in 1977...I don;t even think brochures from dealerships mentioned the horsepower figures.

From what I can recall, a standard 351 in good tune, in something like an XC or XD Falcon, should return something like 10 to 14mpg around town, maybe 18 on the highway if you drive it nicely. Stick a clunky old 3 speed auto behind it, and you're looking at less.

Current V8's like the 6 liter LS2 get rediculous fuel economy figures on the highway (equal to some 4 cylinders of the seventies) because of super efficient EFI systems and gearboxes with 18 overdrive ratios (OK, I exaggerate a bit...). Stick a big four barrel carby on that LS2, and back it with a 3 speed auto with 1:1 ratio in "Drive" and you're fuel economy would drop like a stone back to the bad old days.

If I was building an XD with a 351, and I think you mentioned you weren't out for outright speed, I'd stick with a 2V basic engine, get the heads shaved, ported and polished, and valves and guides set up for unleaded, mild cam, compression ratio nothing much above about 9:1, lightened flywheel. Carby only needs to be (using the CFM calculations of cubic capacity x maximum rpm you will use (be honest) divided by the constant figure 3456) something like a 500 Holley two barrel or maybe a 650 four barrel (don't let anyone talk you into a double-pumper 650...seriously...some guys will have you believe you MUST have a double-pumper. No, you don't.) on a port-matched manifold. Make sure you find someone who knows about jetting and power valve sizes or have a look on Holley's website for advice...it can be a nightmare if someone gets it all wrong, and it;s a bastard to get right again. Set of extractors, twin 2-1/2" system with a single muffler each side, and she'd sound sweet. Whack on a pointless electronic distributor and MSD.
Now comes some bucks...get a Dellow or something bellhousing kit, and fit a four speed auto out of a newer Falcon, or a five speed manual steel case Celica box (if you can find one...something after-market otherwise).
Three inch driveshaft with loop, and a diff ration of around 2.8 to 3.1:1, and you're away. Oddly enough, unless you are going to be absolutely hammering the car, if the car you get doesn't have a nine inch diff, you can actually save some dough by leaving the 8-7/8" Borg Warner diff in place. They usually had a ratio of around 2.98, and you can find them with disc brakes on things like XC Fairmonts and the like. They are a good strong diff, and like I said, unless you plan on racing the car or thrashing it mercilessly, they will last just fine.
Set up like that with a modern overdrive box, a nice light XD should return reasonably OK fuel economy figures...probably around 26-27 mpg on the highway or more.
Apart from the modern gearbox, that's virtually a copy of an engine I did up for a friend to put in his 1979 Marquis Fairlane, and several others I knew of around the place in the eighties.

God damn...I haven't thought about a motor like that for years...thanks for bringing back great memories...

Last edited by Wombat; 20-09-2007 at 10:39 AM.
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!Yahoo Bookmark this Post!Bookmark to AskJeeves!Bookmark to Slashdot!Live Bookmark this Post!Spurl this Post!Reddit! Wong this Post!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 20-09-2007, 07:01 PM
f1tzy's Avatar  

Ride: VZ S ute M6
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Brissy
Trade Rating: (0)
Posts: 370
f1tzy Executive
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by minux View Post
You could be really different and make an awesome mod.

351 clev in the front of the car but because those ugly 3 tonne tanks are symmetrical you could go a nice boss setup in the rear, make it all wheel drive, steering wheel on each end and no one will ever know!!!
like this YouTube - Top Gear Home made stretch limos (Part2 - Test Drive). Gotta watch about a minute in. Cracks me up
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!Google Bookmark this Post!