Now there seems to be alot off ppl here that know cameras i was just wondering i dont really wanna do much u know take pics of my car or pics of friends when were out and **** like i saw a 8 megapixel camera for like 150 is that good or can i do better keeping in mind i dont wanna spend alot
Minux might be your man here, I think he's into photography.
I know a modest amount, and from that I can tell you it's not really the number of megapixles you need to look for, it's more the quality of the lens.
A DSLR is what you want to really good looking pics, because you can slap a top notch lens on it, but for compacts I think if you stick with the big players like Nikon, Canon, Pentax etc you can't go too wrong because they all know their game.
dont buy one from Aldi stores.
absolute crap quality!
Although you could buy it and if its not what you wanted take it back and get a refund
What sort of pictures do you want to take?
Link me to some that you like and I will try and tell you what to buy![]()
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
My vy lumina
something thats i dunno twice as good as those pics that ive taken maybe its just me but they look rough and edgy lol i just want little more detail and stuff i dont wanna go crazy with price but i want it to look good lol if that makes sense
Ok, obviously you don't need a DSLR, best point and shoot would be Panasonic Lumix DMC FX38 - Ted's Camera Stores Australia
Can't go wrong here, they use a Leica lens and for point and shoots produce great images. I know a few guys who keep them in their kit bag and it is something I'd like to buy myself.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
i do not know what a DLSR is lol but okayummmm i was thinkin 550 is a littleee tooo much lol i was thinkin like under 200 bucks lol
Best experience I ever had with a point and shoot was one of those Canon ones with face recognition (it automagically recognises faces in the frame and makes sure they stay in focus). I pointed it at my friends arse and it drew a face box around it lol.
should i wait than and buy a 550 one i wont use it all that much but is it worth it
DSLR = Digital single lens reflex, it's to do with the camera mechanism by which the viewfinder shows exactly what the lens sees, so what you see is exactly what you get basically. They start at around $1000 and go up from there.
For under $200 I reckon whatever off-the-shelf Canon you can find for that price. Minux?
Umm under $200?
I wouldnt waste your money then.
These are the best 3 in the 200-300 price range in my opinion only.
Panasonic Lumix DMC FS3 - Ted's Camera Stores Australia
Sony DSC W150 - Ted's Camera Stores Australia
Canon Ixus 85IS - Ted's Camera Stores Australia
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
Sorry not endorsing Teds, its just they give prices AND pictures![]()
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
ohhh kk thanks for ya time fellas really appreciate it ill prob go wit the canon just have to save up for it now
If you're really keen Wikipedia will tell you more than you ever wanted to know:
Digital single-lens reflex camera - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
![]()
Nothing wrong with Ted's in my book.
Hey Minux are you into HDR at all?
EDIT: Just saw your site, and I gather you areCan I ask what you use to composite your exposures, and how many shots you typically bracket?
I agree with all this , if you don't want to spend $1000 and over , just get a decent Canon Powershot. We bought a Canon powershot 610 about 3 years ago. Since then we have used it for everything and haven't taken the mrs film SLR camera out of its box cos the digital is so easy, quick and cheap. It has 4x optical zoom and 5MP. These days you can het more zoom and more MPixels for less money. They are OK but not excellent indoors , but are great outdoors in the sunlight. Get one that has a decent size lens on it for best results. oh yeah, get some decent rechargeable batteries too, 2500mAh or more.
Although I stand by my comments about going for the most megapixels is a waste, this is nonetheless impressive:
HARLEM-13-GIGAPIXELS.COM
Yeah use HDR, although, It's not something I aim to do unless i feel a scene can be "enhanced" with it.
Just as an example:
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...by_fusionx.jpg
Was 3 exposures
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...ff-senator.jpg
was 5 exposures
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...insfallsda.jpg
was 15 exposures
http://fc33.deviantart.com/fs36/i/20...by_fusionx.jpg
was 7 exposures
I use both Photomatix and Photoshop, depends on the effect and how hard I want it to effect the image.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
Cheers mate, interesting stuff. I particularly like the Childers Cove shot.
I've played with HDR a little, and had some Ok results, but nothing stunning. I'm still experimenting with various exposures. The camera I use can only bracket 3 frames, so I've been curious how much that effects the end result.
I've only used Photoshop to composite, because I suspect dedicated HDR software would be wasted on me at this stage.
Hmm, you are only using bracketing?
I use exposures.
The hopkins falls shot was shot using an ND400. 3 second increments starting at 3 seconds@F8, so 3,6,9,12,15 etc etc.
Its how I do all my HDR, bracketing is hit and miss with how it really exposes, I prefer to let my eyes expose the shot.
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
So far yes. It's something I'm just getting into.
I work alongside print designers in a publications unit doing web design, so we have a reasonable camera for when we need specific shots for work. I sometimes play with it when I have a spare moment - I haven't had as much time to sit down and figure it out as I'd like to
But it's always good to know what works for other people, I might give "manual bracketing" a try next time I have a chanceDoesn't help though that we don't have a tripod in the office
Might bring one from home..