alloytecs came out in the vz's, tisk tisk tisk.......
BOLD writing, i know im twisting your words, but to not confuse people, the alloytec is a completly different design to the old motors, but yes, they are the new generation global engine
LE0 for base and LY7 for high output
EASTERN CREEK JCNSW 2009
Originally Posted by Commydoor
andyman, there was a VY Adventra which included the alloytec, haha
I lol'd.
This right up there with cop chips and supercharged VN interceptors.
Yah, but i meant they are now a standard part of the Commodore range as were the Buicks and Ecotec engines were. If you buy a V6 Commodore nowadays, you get an alloytec. As in i meant they aren't a limited edition or special edition engine or anything. They are now your everyday V6 if you purchase a VZ+ Commodore.
umm, do you want to rethink that???? VY Adventras where V8 ONLY, they went to V6 when the VZ Adventras were released
yeah i knew what you meant, but people read things the wrong way, i know that many people that say the alloytec is just a revised ecotec rar rar rar... thats what they say until i set them straight, its time to educate lol...
EASTERN CREEK JCNSW 2009
Originally Posted by Commydoor
FORSALE - BRICKIES TRESTLES + SOLID STEEL SPIRAL STAIRCASE. -
http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...ressively.html
mate i think you should sit this one out, no vy came with the alloytec
and minux is right about the forced induction /capacity thing, all supercharged and turbo motors have an increased capacity, its by some percentage that they work it out. just purely to make the racing classes more even.
just looked at the vy stuff, i will apolergise as i thought the VY-3 Adventra came with the Alloytec. I was wrong. I know none of the base VY's did, but i thought the adventra did. Anywho - im sticking to what i said about the forced induction capacity things. Just like i said, if i bolt a 3.3lt charger to the top of my alloytec im not going to get a 6.9lt v6 am i? NO, its going to be a forced 3.6.
Exactly.
This thread reeks of FAIL.
Displacement is measured by bore + stroke.
Forced induction increases the volumetric efficiency.
Which simply means less displacement will produce power more efficiently. It won't some how magically make the engine bigger.
Not a hard concept to grasp people!
What I should have said is
I just figured most people would have understood what I was saying. Clearly not.If he has supercharged it then it could very well have a 6.7 litre(equivalent) capacity due to the blower. Much like the falcon XR6T is a 6.7 litre equivalent capacity(possibly 6.8?)
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind."
- Theodor Seuss Geisel
we all know what you said minux, we just like to bitch and whing on what you didn't say.
Research has shown that men usually sleep on the right side of the bed.
Even in our sleep we happen to be right.
Powered By Garrett
I'm not a flippin clarevoyant. And I don't know Minux well enough to assume he has a clue.
Although, how does one quote the equivilant displacement?
It would be all relevant depending on which turbo charger/supercharger was used as to what it could be. And then it could also be effected by the boost pressure.
IMO its a really poor way to measure something.
man you guys are changing the subject, going from displacement vs a frickin racing catorgory.
The displacement is still a 3.6L.
In circuit/club/hill climb racing yes the car will be put into a larger class, the use the engines capacity times 1.6 . roughly. which in RACING ONLY would put the 3.6 BLOWN engine at roughly 5.8 litres.
agree with soop
FAIL THREAD