Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 160
Like Tree3Likes

Thread: Custom intake question

  1. #26
    Drawnnite's Avatar
    Drawnnite is online now Obviously Unsensible
    Ride
    2000 Vs Ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    641

    Default

    firstly, all those intakes look very interesting.
    *drools at same time*

    just out of curiosity.
    how would a twin tb compare to say a single tb.
    and then how would that triple tb compare? (and would you pipe the intake, or leave as 3 open tbs in bay?)

    i doubt i would ever get one (imagine policeman asking to pop the bonnet while you're on p plates =P)
    but id love to know they would compare in gains and so forth.

    and its great to hear from people across the world =P
    how about we make the pedals out of sticky rubber and the shoes with steel spikes. at least my shins would like that
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonesy484 View Post
    yeah i wondered the same thing when i was 4 when i grabbed the chrome exhaust of my dads rx7
    Quote Originally Posted by DM 55 WA View Post
    did you think it was a milo tin?

  2. #27
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Letzride, you need to contact kalmaker mate...
    My car was the twin tb as shown earlier in here and ran a kalmaker mafless tune via a map sensor and it was bang on accurate no timing worries or afr issues. I had a GREAT tuner but still the kalmaker software lets you get rid of the maf no worries.

    So if u can get that software I see no reason why u can't get your itb set up tuned easy enough..

    Also the air speed of twin 55mm will be different to that of three 55mms..


    Drawn tite, I had cops pop my bonnet when it looked like this..



    The pods were "safely secured" and the car wasn't illegally loud so I got let off with a few dubious questions and a "don't let me see any hoon driving or your toast" speech.
    Aslong as my car passed emissions (never tried but it should have with the right tune) and I didn't have the ultra low springs in it I was all legal

    Also twins are DEFINATELY better than a single tb but none of us have seen the triple used...?
    I myself aren't sold there necessary or would help much over the twins but the look sexy!
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  3. #28
    Ride
    VS

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drawnnite View Post
    firstly, all those intakes look very interesting.
    *drools at same time*

    just out of curiosity.
    how would a twin tb compare to say a single tb.
    and then how would that triple tb compare? (and would you pipe the intake, or leave as 3 open tbs in bay?)

    i doubt i would ever get one (imagine policeman asking to pop the bonnet while you're on p plates =P)
    but id love to know they would compare in gains and so forth.

    and its great to hear from people across the world =P
    All i can say is a single TB with pump most of the air into runners 3 and 4. With a twin TB, say like MRC itll even out the flow. Come racing twin TB has twin 55mm but the plenum is also double the volume as stock. Never seen inside one, but you can tell it is like putting the 25mm mace spacer in, without using a spacer.

    Also AJ, where did you get your rad shroud cover from? It makes it look neat and tidy without the L67 OTR which ill be ditching for the mace CAI. Also i have a VS not a VT, so i dare say some slight mods will be required.

  4. #29
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Your very right about evening out the airflow. I mentioned that earlier in the thread.. The Mrc item fixes that, I'm not sure but from what I've seen i'm not sure the come one would? The two tbs still are very central..?

    My rad cover is a gen3 item, for you hit up BYE PERFOMANCE they make a sweet radiator shroud for vs's
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  5. #30
    Ride
    VS

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ajvx01 View Post
    Your very right about evening out the airflow. I mentioned that earlier in the thread.. The Mrc item fixes that, I'm not sure but from what I've seen i'm not sure the come one would? The two tbs still are very central..?

    My rad cover is a gen3 item, for you hit up BYE PERFOMANCE they make a sweet radiator shroud for vs's
    Thanks man, ill check them out.

  6. #31
    Ride
    Camaro

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    26

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Drawnnite View Post
    firstly, all those intakes look very interesting.
    *drools at same time*

    just out of curiosity.
    how would a twin tb compare to say a single tb.
    and then how would that triple tb compare? (and would you pipe the intake, or leave as 3 open tbs in bay?)

    i doubt i would ever get one (imagine policeman asking to pop the bonnet while you're on p plates =P)
    but id love to know they would compare in gains and so forth.

    and its great to hear from people across the world =P
    well stock size tb is what? 65mm right? so a 65mm tb will have an area of 10,414.20mm a twin 55mm throttle body will have an area of 14,912mm so essentially you can flow alot more air. A triple 55mm tb setup would give you about 22,368mm of area allowing you to take that much more air into the plenum all at once at WOT.

    Optionally if you went with something even smaller like lets say a 48mm throttle body (triple) you'd get 17,037.38mm of area and they would flow much faster than your bigger throttle bodies.

    My thinking also was that you can space each throttle body so that it is between 2 runners and you should have very good distribution flow for the cylinders.

    as far as real world results, I dunno what you would see.

    I personally would rather just throw a filter on each tb as well rather than pipe it, because again, that pipe can only be so big and will act similar to being its own manifold.
    1996 3800 camaro- Heads/Cam, 4.10 gears, Ford 8.8 rear end, stall, SD tuned

    Current best: 13.6 @ 97.05 mph
    Current goal: 12's

  7. #32
    immortality's Avatar
    immortality is offline crappy ol' VN driver
    Ride
    VN3.8 5spd/VSII3.8/VH5.0

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    6,808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LETZRIDE View Post
    see, my map based tune works fine the my huge cam and modded heads car atm, but Im tricking the system, skimpish is running the same tune that I have, but modified to his motor (atleast he was)...for us, the VE is maxed out at 200% at WOT and we need to "cheat to attain our tuning goals) I dont know how much "give" we have to this system we're running though....I'd be interested to see that program you speak of, especially since as soon as you take the MAF out of the equation, we have no way of seeing where the KR is in relative to our rpm and load...so we can't "fine tune" our setup for the maximum efficiency (unless one of you knows a mathimatical equation that I can create a custom perameter to this system.

    .
    For starters we are going to need to know what PCM you guys are using, what bins/definitions etc.

    Best bet is to jump on the Delcohack website and see what those boys are up to. They are writing there own tuning software now.

    Kalmaker is good, but expensive and they are still using DOS based software last time i checked. The Delcohack guys are miles ahead now.

    edit: our ecotec is fitted with a 64mm TB standard, however on one side it has a "hump" that keeps one side of the butterfly covered until you reach approx 15% throttle so the TB is probably closer to 60mm cross section.

    Cheers
    Body by Holden, Soul by Brock
    the Legend will live forever

    VN exec T5: 15.1sec @92.2mph 1/4 mile, 9.7sec @ 74.6mph 1/8mile, 2.3sec 60ft, 0-60mph 6.827sec 22/11/07 Gtech competition



  8. #33
    Ride
    VS

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    So tripple 48mm tbs might be the go. At 220 each plus making the plenum up. Could still work out cheaper then twin TBs from MRC (dont have a price for them) and come racing ($1500)

    The only issue i can see is the IAC and TPS...

  9. #34
    Ride
    Camaro

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    26

    Default

    $220 each? Buy a set of 4 off of a bike...they come in a million sizes and cheap, I have 8 sitting in my basement that I got for $160 that I've been playing with...Hell, I've contemplated just slapping on some haybusa or gsxr 600 throttlebodies (all 4 in a row and not breaking them apart) and calling it a day...but Im sure that would look pretty ghetto lol... I know you guys are in australia and it might be sh*tty as far as shipping goes, but check out this site ITB: Single Throttle Body

    those tb's seem to actually be the easiest to work with, and they run about $169 each...I might go this route myself...

    For starters we are going to need to know what PCM you guys are using, what bins/definitions etc.

    Best bet is to jump on the Delcohack website and see what those boys are up to. They are writing there own tuning software now.

    Kalmaker is good, but expensive and they are still using DOS based software last time i checked. The Delcohack guys are miles ahead now.

    edit: our ecotec is fitted with a 64mm TB standard, however on one side it has a "hump" that keeps one side of the butterfly covered until you reach approx 15% throttle so the TB is probably closer to 60mm cross section.
    I have no idea what kind of pcm we have? How do you find something like that out? we use hp tuners. I'll check out your guys software shortly.

    I'd be interested to see if if can be used on our cars, and our stuff vice versa...or if it can't, I wonder if your pcms would work if you plugged it into our cars.

    Curious, arent any of you guys running our american motors at all? anyone who swapped did they swap the pcm as well? And I guess this might be a silly question but, you guys use the 4l60e tranny as well right?
    1996 3800 camaro- Heads/Cam, 4.10 gears, Ford 8.8 rear end, stall, SD tuned

    Current best: 13.6 @ 97.05 mph
    Current goal: 12's

  10. #35
    immortality's Avatar
    immortality is offline crappy ol' VN driver
    Ride
    VN3.8 5spd/VSII3.8/VH5.0

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    6,808

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by LETZRIDE View Post
    I have no idea what kind of pcm we have? How do you find something like that out? we use hp tuners. I'll check out your guys software shortly.

    I'd be interested to see if if can be used on our cars, and our stuff vice versa...or if it can't, I wonder if your pcms would work if you plugged it into our cars.

    Curious, arent any of you guys running our american motors at all? anyone who swapped did they swap the pcm as well? And I guess this might be a silly question but, you guys use the 4l60e tranny as well right?
    Our early V6 models used the 808, then we progressed to the 165. not sure what exactly the later ecotec used but PCM numbers should be listed on the delcohack site.

    Up until VT models (99) we used PCM's with memcal, then we progressed to PCM's using a flash memory set up.

    Yep, we use the 4l60e. I don't think anybody has really imported a whole US engine.

    Support for the V6 models is limited here also, probably more private stuff going on then anything else except Kalmaker.
    Body by Holden, Soul by Brock
    the Legend will live forever

    VN exec T5: 15.1sec @92.2mph 1/4 mile, 9.7sec @ 74.6mph 1/8mile, 2.3sec 60ft, 0-60mph 6.827sec 22/11/07 Gtech competition



  11. #36
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by seq4x4 View Post
    So tripple 48mm tbs might be the go. At 220 each plus making the plenum up. Could still work out cheaper then twin TBs from MRC (dont have a price for them) and come racing ($1500)

    The only issue i can see is the IAC and TPS...
    Before you jump to a conclusion ask Mrc for a quote... I was happily suprised
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  12. #37
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Also the throttles in that web link look cool but I'm not sure how you'd mount up your tps? Since there not made for the right gear..?

    The motor bike 4 throttle would be getto but sick!
    I'd be HEAPS keen to see the results.
    However I see the tps issue still being there?

    As for the PCM of you have a memcal you could probably find a solution easy enough... As they don't have to be live flash tuned.

    I doubt our memcals would be a straight swap as your cars have different dashes, power accessories etc etc etc.

    However if u have a gm part number we could see?
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  13. #38
    TI3VOM's Avatar
    TI3VOM is offline VT V6 wanting 300RWHP
    Ride
    VT V6 Acclaime S1

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Somewhere
    Posts
    744

    Default

    If any of you are handy here is a good and helpful read: StreetWagons.com • View topic - Ecotec Twin Throttle Bodies
    VT V6 fitted with DMS gold 40mm coilovers, Whiteline adjustable swaybars & strut brace, 330mm AP racing brakes, Rebuilt 3.45:1 LSD and a Powerdyne supercharger

    Check it out: http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...-v6-racer.html

  14. #39
    Ride
    Camaro

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    26

    Default

    good read, Im very tempted to use bike tbs for ease of use...but 4 tbs on a v6, people are gunna think I'm definetly retarded.

    As far as the TPS goes, what about using the existing bike ones? I think they are a 5v wire as well? if not, maybe there is a plug in/resistor or something that will let the sensor talk to the pcm.

    The other thing is they have twin butterflies in the throttlebodies (secondaries are there to I guess help smooth the idle) which I guess could be useful in helping to tame the car at low speeds...of you can just remove it all together lol.

    Memcal sounds familiar for our pcms, I'll see if I can get a part number when I uncover my car from snow in the next few days...
    1996 3800 camaro- Heads/Cam, 4.10 gears, Ford 8.8 rear end, stall, SD tuned

    Current best: 13.6 @ 97.05 mph
    Current goal: 12's

  15. #40
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    If u could find a compatible bike tips that's awesome but you'd have to pretty lucky..
    I fir one would love to the quad bike tbs done!
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  16. #41
    Ride
    VS

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    1,049

  17. #42
    Ride
    Camaro

    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    26

    Default

    has been shitty weather, so I haven't attempted to go nab my car from its shelter lol to pull pcm numbers.

    Other than that, Im just hear listening to other people throw ideas around and throw my 2 cents in every now and then. I can't do much about the intake until I get my tranny issues sorted out

    Dunno where the other two went though? some good ideas got tossed around in here. I'd like to hear more myself.
    1996 3800 camaro- Heads/Cam, 4.10 gears, Ford 8.8 rear end, stall, SD tuned

    Current best: 13.6 @ 97.05 mph
    Current goal: 12's

  18. #43
    Ride
    VS

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Sunshine Coast, Queensland
    Posts
    1,049

    Default

    Im planing on rebuilding my 4L60E, using parts from the states you can do a full rebuild, all new solenoids, shift kits, vette servo and a nice paint job for under $500AUD. If the problems is the operation of the box, might be worth looking into

  19. #44
    troykinsvt's Avatar
    troykinsvt is offline yes i like fibreglassing
    Ride
    VT

    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    helensvale
    Posts
    171

    Default



    POSITIVE THIS PIC IS IN THIS MONTHS ISSUE OF STREET COMMODORES
    stroking is fine but id rather be blown

  20. #45
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    Correct

    Car was my pride and joy! Can't speak highly enough of the MRC PERFORMANCE manifold either...
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  21. #46
    Ride
    VT 2

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    414

    Default

    Couple of comments...

    The point of the twin plenum is to increase runner length which improves torque.

    However, if the inlet tract gets too long, throttle response will suffer.

    To make the best of the situation, I would put a small pressure equalization tube between the 2 manifolds, of say 1" ID, and run a single MAP on one side only.

    If it was a MAF it would be a different story.

  22. #47
    Ride
    1998 VT Commodore

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Heathcote
    Posts
    67

    Default

    48mm = 1809mm^2
    79mm = 4901mm^2

    Unless I buggered my maths. Plus this is cross sectional, so you'll be losing about 5% because of the thickness of the butterfly(or rather, the thing holding the butterfly), which also contributes to airflow turbulence itself, and potentially reduces the amount of air that can actually get through.

    2 on each side, which is possible if you put the battery in the boot and stuck another airbox where the battery once was.

    2 * 4901 = 9802^2mm
    4 * 4901 = 19604^2mm
    4 * 1809 = 7236^2mm
    8 * 1809 = 14472^2mm

    Then you have the problem of having to have 4 or 8 TB's all open at the same time(otherwise you're just wasting space with them).

    If you have access to 2 plenum chambers, cut the TB off one, then cut an equal amount off the side opposite the plenum chamber of the other one, and weld it together, so you have a throttle body pointing out each direction. The reasoning is simple, if you have 2 x 79mm throttle bodies, and you feed them both using a 79mm pipe, you're not going to magically gain another 100% air, you're more likely to be having 100% air spread between 2, or maybe another 20-30%. Whereas if you feed 2 bodies with 2 79mm pipes, then you remove that problem, and you also magically gain 100% more air, by the fact you have doubled it. An airbox will fit in the space left by the battery, might need some tweaking, but it will. Otherwise you could just stick a pod on the end like everybody else and call it a day, and do away with the box.

    If you could remove the headlights, you could make 2 scoops the size of the headlight going down to the 79mm tube or whatever size it is, simply cutting up an old filter to fit the gap and ensure the air is filtered, the faster you go, the more air you get into the scoops, and so on and so forth. Piece of fly screen over the hole to stop all objects bigger than 1mm, and then any tiny particles will be stopped by your filters. Might even gain a few horses at the higher speeds, because of the higher rate the air is flowing and being compressed into a smaller space.

    Just my 2 cents.

    EDIT: The piece holding the throttle body on, not the body itself. Just borrow/hire a plasma cutter and cut it out nice and clean, then stick it in the spot and TIG it up, or take it to an engineering mob and see if they'll do it for a few bucks.
    Last edited by Irukanji; 08-02-2012 at 11:18 AM.

  23. #48
    Ride
    308 vc

    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    North east Adelaide
    Posts
    348

    Default

    I'd be keen to see that set up made in real life
    Wanted to buy VC sunroof
    Pm me

  24. #49
    Ride
    1998 VT Commodore

    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Heathcote
    Posts
    67

  25. #50
    Drawnnite's Avatar
    Drawnnite is online now Obviously Unsensible
    Ride
    2000 Vs Ute

    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    641

    Default

    with the double throttle body idea.
    like how troy posted. but different

    would it not be best to offset the tb's if they are on either side of the plenum. so one does 1-3 and other 4-6.
    or would this cause problems?.

    and would 6 small tb's actually be possible on an ecotec?
    would be a sight to see.
    how about we make the pedals out of sticky rubber and the shoes with steel spikes. at least my shins would like that
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonesy484 View Post
    yeah i wondered the same thing when i was 4 when i grabbed the chrome exhaust of my dads rx7
    Quote Originally Posted by DM 55 WA View Post
    did you think it was a milo tin?

Page 2 of 7 FirstFirst 123456 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Custom Intake - Or the Likes.
    By SuperSixty6 in forum Mace Engineering
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-04-2010, 02:01 PM
  2. Custom Air Intake VT/VX
    By mercuri in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-05-2009, 12:10 AM
  3. SV6 Custom intake idea
    By nikolas in forum VZ Holden Commodore (2004 - 2006)
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 03-11-2008, 08:39 PM
  4. Custom intake
    By [JUDGE] in forum VN - VP Holden Commodore (1988 - 1993)
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 25-02-2007, 09:39 PM
  5. Custom Air Intake
    By dkne in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 18-04-2004, 05:01 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71