| VE Holden Commodore (2006 - ?) Talk about anything relating to the VE Holden Commodore. |
16-05-2008, 08:33 PM
|
|
|
|
Ride: ve ss manual
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 36
|
|
which OTR for ve ss
Which do use think its best one? who has tested any?
out of orrsom otr, russo otr and the csv one?
|
16-05-2008, 09:11 PM
|
 |
12 SECONDS OF LS1 GOODNES
|
|
Ride: VX SS M6,222/224,twin 3",3"cats,25% UDP,OTR
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nowra
Posts: 386
|
|
russo or orrsom would be my choice
|
16-05-2008, 10:09 PM
|
 |
...better than you!
|
|
Ride: 2007 E-Series HSV Clubsport R8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 848
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMMAD
russo or orrsom would be my choice
|
Well yeah - considering they're the ONLY ones abailable for the VE so far...
ORSSOM is the better of the two and gives you the option of retaining the MAF. Check it out here: CAI Pty Ltd - Orssom Performance OTRCAI Products
I have one... It really is AWESOME!!!
|
18-05-2008, 09:15 AM
|
|
|
|
Ride: N/A
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12
|
|
The orrsum, Russo & CSV OTR’s have been independently tested by Chipmaster in WA and guess which one performs best. 
There is some interesting reading in this link check it out...
Chipmaster Dyno VE OTR TEST
Here is a Caprice I tuned last week so basically with the Russo OTR and Mafless tune this car went from 204rwkw to 240rwkw without changing anything else. With track results to back it up.
BTW If this VE was an SS it would go even faster cause a Caprice is about 150kg’s heavier. lol
YouTube - Russo OTR & Tune Only
|
18-05-2008, 07:51 PM
|
|
...better than you!
|
|
Ride: 2007 E-Series HSV Clubsport R8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 848
|
|
Can't anyone friggin spell it right except me???
It's ORSSOM!!!
Anyway, the reason the ORSSOM one is the best, it it's able to be tuned with the MAF on or off. Personally, I wanted to retain my MAF as there's no point running a MAFless tune with only CAI and exhaust.
And for the record, the summary from that link has no clear winner:
Quote:
|
All the OTR's tested work effectively and fitment will come down to personal preference and if the car is a street car or a strip weapon.
|
|
18-05-2008, 08:23 PM
|
|
12 SECONDS OF LS1 GOODNES
|
|
Ride: VX SS M6,222/224,twin 3",3"cats,25% UDP,OTR
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nowra
Posts: 386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Slow Poke
Well yeah - considering they're the ONLY ones abailable for the VE so far...
ORSSOM is the better of the two and gives you the option of retaining the MAF. Check it out here: CAI Pty Ltd - Orssom Performance OTRCAI Products
I have one... It really is AWESOME!!! |
how are they the only ones available for VE 
|
18-05-2008, 08:24 PM
|
|
12 SECONDS OF LS1 GOODNES
|
|
Ride: VX SS M6,222/224,twin 3",3"cats,25% UDP,OTR
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nowra
Posts: 386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Slow Poke
Can't anyone friggin spell it right except me???
It's ORSSOM!!!
Anyway, the reason the ORSSOM one is the best, it it's able to be tuned with the MAF on or off. Personally, I wanted to retain my MAF as there's no point running a MAFless tune with only CAI and exhaust.
And for the record, the summary from that link has no clear winner:
|
so the reason it is the best isnt because it gains the most power or has the best track time its because it cant run a maf or mafless
good theory mate
Last edited by GMMAD; 18-05-2008 at 10:04 PM.
|
19-05-2008, 05:04 PM
|
|
...better than you!
|
|
Ride: 2007 E-Series HSV Clubsport R8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 848
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GMMAD
so the reason it is the best isnt because it gains the most power or has the best track time its because it cant run a maf or mafless
good theory mate
|
From my point of view? Yes. Remember, microseconds faster or a couple of rwkw more isn't everyone's priority.
|
19-05-2008, 05:34 PM
|
|
12 SECONDS OF LS1 GOODNES
|
|
Ride: VX SS M6,222/224,twin 3",3"cats,25% UDP,OTR
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Nowra
Posts: 386
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Slow Poke
From my point of view? Yes. Remember, microseconds faster or a couple of rwkw more isn't everyone's priority.
|
but you can use the maf with the CSV and the orrssum one too
so they must be the best for you too
|
19-05-2008, 06:56 PM
|
|
...better than you!
|
|
Ride: 2007 E-Series HSV Clubsport R8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 848
|
|
CSV doesn't look as good 
|
20-05-2008, 06:49 AM
|
 |
|
|
Ride: CV8Z Monaro
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Brisbane
Posts: 14
|
|
How about one of these.
|
20-05-2008, 11:33 AM
|
|
...better than you!
|
|
Ride: 2007 E-Series HSV Clubsport R8
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Canberra
Posts: 848
|
|
That's a different one again! Which one's that?
There's 5 that I know of now...
|
21-05-2008, 06:16 PM
|
|
|
|
Ride: ve
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cousin Slow Poke
From my point of view? Yes. Remember, microseconds faster or a couple of rwkw more isn't everyone's priority.
|
microsecond faster my ve runs 11.74 with the russo one bolt on.I think that is more than a microsecond faster.What does your car run?
If you know what you are doing maffless is better. 
|
21-05-2008, 06:35 PM
|
 |
Moderator
|
|
Ride: VP, VN wagons, E21 318i
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3,295
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by mickssv
microsecond faster my ve runs 11.74 with the russo one bolt on.I think that is more than a microsecond faster.What does your car run?
If you know what you are doing maffless is better. |
going by his post, he probaly doesnt have a 1/4 time or doesnt care what it is.
so how much did you gain with "just" the russo, or did you do other stuff at the same time?
__________________
Quote:
[17:50] {Gaybar} i had some fun lastnight <----- Mack
[17:50] {hakhawk} hence the name
|
ɹıɐɥɔ ɹnoʎ ɟɟo uǝllɐɟ ǝʌ,noʎ 'sıɥʇ pɐǝɹ uɐɔ noʎ ɟı
| | |
