VL or VL turbo costs
which would be cheaper to run .. as in petrol useage, etc...
a VL or a VL turbo... or would they kinda be the same costs?
im just woundering before i buy one..
Projecting
Just the VL. In many ways.
But what would be more fun.. The turbo.
work done by ME
yeah because the turbo puts in more air and that air needs more fuel
my web sitestuff on the XF throttle body conversion, calais interior and lots of other junk!
Projecting
More Heat, More HP, More moving parts. More expensive to replace most turbo spec parts. But is it worth it?
<---Brad Quaid = internet stalker
HELL YES BEX!!!!! (is that the answer you were looking for????)
Projecting
Hopefully so.. FrozenFish should see the light.
<<<There's a good present
i think i'd prefer a supercharger. power is always there. no turbo lag or spooling time.
Projecting
With the right choice of turbo - Lag is never really there anyway..
Combined with a strong auto with a stall converter any turbo pumping out full boost behind 3 is lovely.. Stall, go.. No changing gears, just constant boost until your backing off.
<<<There's a good present
and right diameter piping too. i'm a bit on the fence with the supercharger and turbo debate.
<---Brad Quaid = internet stalker
be exciting mate and put both on. its been done... wont hurt to be done again!!!
<<<There's a good present
if i had one of those magical trees that grew money i wouldi once worked on a ag. machinery engine that was supercharged and twin turbo'd. mind you the engine was bigger than a complete car. but oooooh the power.
<---Brad Quaid = internet stalker
yeah my money tree withered and died a little while ago....
Posting Permissions
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote