Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 24

Thread: Fastest Stock commodore ever made??

  1. #1
    Ride
    Holden VR Commodore

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    198

    Default Fastest Stock commodore ever made??

    Just wanted to know is the Vp the fastest stock commodore ever made??

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    S.E. Melb
    Posts
    172

    Default

    I assume you mean non-v8, non-hsv, non-turbo (vl).

    If you remove those from the list, then I believe so, most Internet figures quote around 8.0-8.1s for 0-100

    -dave

  3. #3
    Duck_vp Guest

    Default

    the vp commodore has the most powerful V6 engine holden have evey made and it produce's 127Kw and can go from 0-100Km in 8 seconds flat it takes the VT 9.7

  4. #4
    Ride
    Holden Captiva (Work Demo)

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    1,752

    Default

    what about the VS 147kw engine? similar weight as a vp.
    Some people say less talk more action, i say more torque less traction.

  5. #5
    Ride
    VT SS 5.7L Commodore.

    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,533

    Default

    Umm I think there is a correction to the VP with the fastest V6, how about the alloytec 190KW
    VY were 152kw.
    I think he means which commodore itself is the fastest for a stock car?
    By the way has anyone got any figures for a 190kw alloytec engine yet as in 0-100km, 0-400m.
    As for a VP or VN stock doing 0-100km 8 seconds. I will see it when I believe it.

    Cheers,
    Jim

  6. #6

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    S.E. Melb
    Posts
    172

    Default

    oh yeah, forgot about the alloytec, the new sv6 owns all in terms of N/A factory V6's.

    -dave

  7. #7
    Ride
    Gen F GTS

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    192

    Default

    2fast2furiousdude

    Please go to attached website. It shows vp doing 0-100 in 8 seconds flat.

    http://www.southgate.com.au/history.htm

    However, i believe that their way of measuring 0-100 these days would have changed because i whoop stock vp's with my vx s pac and it says mine is 0-100 in 9 secs

  8. #8
    Duck_vp Guest

    Default

    The reason why the vp is the fastest, is because of the computers in the vr and up have a speed and power lock on them and that is what slows them down, and that is why when they say[B] the engine in vr and up can do so many Kw's but they can't becase the computer stops it.

    also for the car to get that fast depends on the driver

  9. #9
    VNBOY Guest

    Default

    i think you will find that other than the Alloytec driven cars, a VN series one is the fastest ( i read it somewhere, ill try and find the article)

    they had to reduce the torque onthe series 2 VN's due to too many people slipping out in the wet and they also put the bellmouth on the car as well to further restrict the power.
    (i know VP motors had an extra 3 kW but that was at the motor not the wheels, and with less torque it made there figures worse)


    dpalomes: the reason youd beat stock VP's these days is because most of them have done nearly 200,000 k's and the motor etc. wont be running as well as it was when it was as new as your car. but yeah youd beat them stock these days.

  10. #10
    Ride
    VS S1 Executive V6

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Maroochydore
    Posts
    704

    Default

    i made the below comment in another thread. you're right. forgot about current SV6 which has a claimed 0-100 time of 6.9. other than that, going by factory figures (if you believe them) base VZ V6 175kw Commodore is still slower than both VN's & VP's. Ecotec and Alloytec are much more powerful and refined engines, however, VN's weighed approx 1300kg's+, VZ's are up around 1550+kg's. as has been mentioned, how torque comes in under acceleration in a VN/VP seems to also make a big diff as to how a VN/VP accelerates. Commodore models VT on have made big improvements with creating a smooth changing auto compared to earlier models & I don't believe Holden are able to acheive this without losing some brute acceleration. i.e, a VN auto changes like 'bang,bang,bang' clutches in auto seem to lock up harder or something (?).







    When i brought v6 Calais 3 years ago had the usual honeymoon period (thought it was the ducks nuts) but ended up being a very dissapointing drive. i didn't have g tech back then but estimate 1/4 mile time as high 16's. took calais to The Brock Shop (underwood/brisbane) got it dynoed. in doing so they restored about 10 kw's so it was back to factory figures exactly. they acheived this i believe by cleaning throttle body & some fiddling with computer. after this i changed leads & plugs and fitted ram style cold air intake lots of injector cleaner, 2 1/2" exhaust etc, after all this it felt like it revved twice as hard, can now beat my mate in his stock VP (which was fastest factory stock commo Holden ever made) only thing now that i feel lets calais down is the auto which feels a bit tired. (i drive it like a manual which i've heard stuffs them!)
    __________________
    VS Calais V6 S1 15.65@92mph (g tech)


    Something I've Been Getting Into Lately....

    Get Paid To Surf The Internet!

    Program About To Be Released So I Jumped Aboard...

    http://www.agloco.com/r/BBDB3431

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. The most "ugliest" Commodore ever made
    By craigvk in forum Just Commodores Polls
    Replies: 188
    Last Post: 23-03-2012, 05:59 PM
  2. Stock Vk Commodore Air flow sender unit
    By stockvk1 in forum VB - VK Holden Commodore (1978 - 1985)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 26-04-2006, 12:14 PM
  3. who has the fastest VT/VX commodore?
    By kpoida in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 14-10-2005, 07:39 PM
  4. Commodore Speedway street stock ***HOBART CHEAP***
    By robohsv in forum Parts And Other Items For Sale
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-09-2005, 04:02 PM
  5. VR commodore Stock Radio Clock
    By jetpilot83 in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-08-2005, 04:53 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900