Results 1 to 21 of 21

Thread: K&N Filter + VS S/C CAI

  1. #1
    Ride
    99 VT Berlina II sedan

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Victoria Park
    Posts
    66

    Question K&N POD Filter + VS S/C CAI

    hey guys,

    Im thinking of buying a K&N pod filter and the VS S/C CAI and i was just curious what it is exactly i will be needing to do, does the K&N filter fit in the stock filter box? or will i need to buy something for it to go in? because i heard that it will just take in more hot air if its out by itself in the engine bay. Also with the VS S/C CAI with the heat gun thing....ill go out and buy one from bunnings or something but never used one before so does it take long to heat the top of it up? Main reason i ask such questions is cuz i really just dont wanna stuff anything up. I Presume the fitting of these are pretty much straight forward.

    Appreciate your help guys even though you have probably answered all this before.

  2. #2
    Ride
    '92 HSV VP GTS

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    2,069

    Default

    Yes, Its wont take long to heat the top of the CAI, I could heat it up a fair bit with a hair dryer. I didnt even need to heat it up tho, myne worked fine w/o any mods. For the pod, yes it will take in hot air from the engine but they take a shitload of air into the engine. My setup ATM is I have the bottom half of the airbox in the engine bay with the CAI connected to it. Then I have the pod connected and sitting (resting) on the bottom half of the box, so it gets a bit of flow from the CAI still. The airflow rate for a K&N pod filter is 441CMF(cant remember what its measured in) and the K&N pannel filter is 221CMF. But its up to you, some people argue that pannels are beter, others that pods are beter. Pods are illegal in most states (unboxed ones) and pannels are legal. Up to you champ.

  3. #3
    Blown V6 Hatch's Avatar
    Blown V6 Hatch is offline Too many projects.....
    Ride
    VN Calais 5.0, UC Torana hatch 383, WB Ute 5.0

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Cowes, Phillip Island
    Posts
    3,243

  4. #4
    habro's Avatar
    habro is offline Resident Car Hack
    Ride
    VP Exec

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Perth, WA
    Posts
    129

    Default

    yeah i installed both mine today, took about 10 minutes. i also didnt have to mod anything - just cut my airbox to fit the snorkel, held the cai in place and drilled the screws in [just make sure you dont hit the radiator, though there's a fair amount of gap] with a couple of washers on top. first time i closed the bonnet it took a tiny bit more effort, but now it just opens up fine, nothing catches and didnt have to change the bonnet height. oh and make sure you take off the plastic thats on the bottom of the bonnet thats held in with little lugs - or you'll get no air coming in

  5. #5
    Ride
    VZ LS1 Calais

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    South Brisbane
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    i can see where this thread is gunna lead...another pod v panel debate.
    neway you should check out this new intake k&n have brought out,it has an over the radiator cold air intake which funnels the air over to a pod enclosed in a heat shield...it looks like it would work a treat.

  6. #6
    Ride
    10 VE SSV,03 VY Exec, 83 Wb Statesman

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    927

    Default

    well if you want a pod vs panel debate :P ive had a pod and ive had a panel and all i can say is at least the panel is legal

  7. #7
    Ride
    VZ LS1 Calais

    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    South Brisbane
    Posts
    2,933

    Default

    lol...its only illegal if they see it.
    but seriously,its a bit of a grey zone,but im almost certain they are legal if the have a boxed inclosure/heat shield around the pod.
    but i have neither for mine. i a pod on my old vn calais too and it passed a rwc (road worthy certificate) for when i sold that.so.....

  8. #8
    mouce's Avatar
    mouce is offline Physics Geek
    Ride
    VN V6 Series 1 Executive Sedan

    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,051

    Default

    I had it checked with VicRoads and they said that a pod is legal (boxed or unboxed) so long as the engine noise (inlet) does not exceeed EPA regulations and the exhaust gas emissions still meet EPA limits.

    I've been getting around with an unboxed pod now for more than a year (In Victoria) and have the e-mail from VicRoads sitting in the Glove-Box incase any cop wants to argue it with me.

    Check with the regulatory body in your state. You might be surprised at how helpful they can be. I certainly was
    Gravity is proof that nature keeps getting us down.

  9. #9
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    stick with a vs v8 airbox and cai thats what im running and i got no issues, pods are fine, but if you can get the pod with diret cold air they do work really well.
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

  10. #10
    Ride
    99 VT Berlina II sedan

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Victoria Park
    Posts
    66

    Default

    thanks alot guys i really appreciate the input from people with the know-how because i dont know how to do anything with cars haha. i'll have a look at the panel filter and pod when i go into the shops today hopefully. Im guessing holden dealers are only open weekdays so ill have to look into that another time.

  11. #11
    fazz1977's Avatar
    fazz1977 is offline myspace.com/fazz_himself
    Ride
    1992 VP Executive Wagon, L27 V6 3800

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Frankghanistan, Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    686

    Default

    I run a K&N panel filter and a VS s/c V6 CAI. Between the 2 items i've noticed a massive increase in midrange torque and about a 8-10% increase in fuel economy (unless I put the boot in all the time). At stock my VP wagon would pull 350-400kms a tank, now it's more like 450+.

  12. #12
    Ride
    '92 HSV VP GTS

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    2,069

    Default

    I can't say the CAI did anything for me compaired to removing the belly. I was hoping for more, but its all in your head.

  13. #13
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    vs cai good option vn ss loves it k & N plus good leads , good oil and regular service good ecoconomy +,good exhaust system nice!!!
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

  14. #14
    Ride
    My00 Wrx 240kwatw

    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    307

    Default

    Guys all the gains you think ur getting its all in your head, like the guy posted above. Ive had both 'pod' and 'cai with k&n' and i cant notice anything and its not even worth it. For the price of the cai and k&n, your better off getting a cheap pod filter. They work the same, the difference isnt even noticable from the hot air and cold air getting sucked in.

    I dont know why this whole forum believes in them, the only mods worth doing were the extractors and exhaust, and that was because i got them cheap second hand.

  15. #15
    Ride
    VR V6 5-speed

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    130

    Default

    is it possible to get a larger airbox out of say a vt and fit it in a vr?
    with a k&n panel filter would it flow more then an equivalent vr box with k&n or a pod?
    i just ask because ive got a spare vt airbox in my boot!

  16. #16
    Ride
    91 VN SS 355

    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    WEST SUBS
    Posts
    2,632

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Soybean
    is it possible to get a larger airbox out of say a vt and fit it in a vr?
    with a k&n panel filter would it flow more then an equivalent vr box with k&n or a pod?
    i just ask because ive got a spare vt airbox in my boot!
    vs supercharged air box fits
    Cheers.


    * RVN 355 *

  17. #17
    1991_Vn2nV's Avatar
    1991_Vn2nV is offline Donating Member
    Ride
    91 VN Berlina & 03 VY Berlina

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Gumeracha, Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    8,715

  18. #18
    Ride
    vn executive wagon

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    24

    Default

    remember to reset your IAC after doing the CAI mod, and you will definitely notice an improvement,and while you are about it , you might as well give the throttle body a good clean.

  19. #19
    fazz1977's Avatar
    fazz1977 is offline myspace.com/fazz_himself
    Ride
    1992 VP Executive Wagon, L27 V6 3800

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Frankghanistan, Melbourne, VIC
    Posts
    686

    Default

    The VS SC V6 air box is exactly the same as a VN/VP one. The VS V8 one is different. I tried fitting a VY air box to the VP, way too tall, was worth a shot though.
    Life's Grouse in Frankston South!

  20. #20
    immortality's Avatar
    immortality is offline crappy ol' VN driver
    Ride
    VN3.8 5spd/VSII3.8/VH5.0

    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Auckland NZ
    Posts
    6,808

    Default

    the later model V8 airboxes flow more but the outlet faces the wrong way for the V6 guys, apparently the the top half of the V6 box with the aluminum trumpet is actually a flow restriction??? i just fitted a pod where the airbox use to be and i'm in the process of fabricating some sort of heat sheild. it seems to have a better throttle responce with the pod. when i finish all my other modes like exhaust etc i'm goingto get it re-tuned on a dyno, i'll fit the old airbox first and do back to back runs with the old box and the new pod etc and see if there really is a difference, might take a while though

  21. #21
    Ride
    vn executive wagon

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    24

    Question

    Quote Originally Posted by VNPOWER
    Guys all the gains you think ur getting its all in your head, like the guy posted above. Ive had both 'pod' and 'cai with k&n' and i cant notice anything and its not even worth it. For the price of the cai and k&n, your better off getting a cheap pod filter. They work the same, the difference isnt even noticable from the hot air and cold air getting sucked in.

    I dont know why this whole forum believes in them, the only mods worth doing were the extractors and exhaust, and that was because i got them cheap second hand.
    Is it all in my head when my cars fuel consumption improves . Maybe the power of positive thinking is wayyy underated !

Similar Threads

  1. Filter for CAI
    By richie_cky in forum VN - VP Holden Commodore (1988 - 1993)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-10-2005, 11:29 AM
  2. Pod Filter - VK
    By Shifty1 in forum VB - VK Holden Commodore (1978 - 1985)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 12-08-2005, 01:45 PM
  3. STandard AIr filter or K&N POD/FIlter
    By KDB1972VT in forum General
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 29-07-2005, 11:16 AM
  4. Pod Filter
    By raZel in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 24-07-2005, 10:26 PM
  5. Pod Filter?
    By Shivaga in forum The Pub
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: 20-07-2005, 01:29 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71