Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: Exhaust thoughts

  1. #1
    Ride
    VT SS 5.7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Goulburn
    Posts
    1,118

    Default Exhaust thoughts

    what would be better this exhuast system on a 5.7 gen3
    TWIN 2.5" EXHAUST 5.7L COMMODORE SEDAN VT VY VX VZ SS (eBay item 120640512400 end time 29-Nov-10 09:24:38 AEDST) : Cars, Bikes, Boats $300

    or a twin 2 1/2 inch (Custom) from my local muffler centre for $600
    Real cars don't power the front wheels, they lift them

  2. #2
    Ride
    Commodore M6

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    517

  3. #3
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    I wouldn't recommend them...
    Not a major fan of redback mufflers.
    Not a fan of Xpipes. Personally I think they sound like utter shit.

  4. #4
    Ride
    VT SS 5.7

    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Goulburn
    Posts
    1,118

    Default

    lol, well the choice is down to a 2 1/2 twin system, from super shit auto for $800 or $600 for a custom built 1 from my local muffler centre.
    unless i can pick up a 2nd hand 1
    Real cars don't power the front wheels, they lift them

  5. #5
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Go the custom deal then. Make sure they don't use an Xpipe!!!

    What mufflers are they going to use?

  6. #6
    Ride
    98 VT Exec

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Redbank Plains, QLD
    Posts
    117

  7. #7
    Ride
    VT SS S2 A4

    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    1,259

  8. #8
    Ride
    Commodore M6

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    517

    Default

    if i was on a budget i'd go that $299

    it's an LS1... it's always gonna sound shit

  9. #9
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

  10. #10
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by NightRIDA View Post
    dont X pipes distribute air more evenly?
    Not really no.
    It totally depends on where they are in the exhaust and how they're designed.

    Xforce Xpipes aren't designed, they're just two bends cut and welded together.
    All it does is even out the exhaust pulse, which in theory is probably better for performance. But in the real world makes no difference, other then that the exhaust note sound like an L67.

  11. #11
    Ride
    Commodore M6

    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    East Coast
    Posts
    517

  12. #12
    Ride
    98 VT Exec

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Redbank Plains, QLD
    Posts
    117

    Default

    Not really no.
    It totally depends on where they are in the exhaust and how they're designed.

    Xforce Xpipes aren't designed, they're just two bends cut and welded together.
    All it does is even out the exhaust pulse, which in theory is probably better for performance. But in the real world makes no difference, other then that the exhaust note sound like an L67.
    Thanks mate!

  13. #13
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    The 'X' pipe of an X force or that one in the picture isn't really an X pipe. It is exactly as soop said, just two bends cut and welded.

    A true X pipe is actually pressed so that the pipework forms an X the same diameter right through the bends, like this

    A true X pipe will scavenge better and improve acceleration if fitted in the correct position for the engine. How it does this is cross the exhaust pulse over to the other bank and pull the next pulse along behind it, increasing exhaust velocity.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  14. #14
    S.T.K.E's Avatar
    S.T.K.E is offline Wiggle Wiggle Wiggle
    Ride
    Holden Jackaroo 3.0TD

    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Brisbane Northside
    Posts
    334

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by TonyJZX View Post
    what are you talking about?

    L67s sound awesome

    no really...

    lol
    Bullshit lol

    This is with a crossover to..... Just on a side note

    STKE's Ride: http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/...lais-3-8s.html

    Quote Originally Posted by Tim Smtih
    Also you could just whisper in his ear "guess what i did to your mum last night?" And walk away laughing.

  15. #15
    Ride
    VT SS LS1/T56

    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    30

    Default

    iv got a 2.5 mild steel xforce system put on the other day on my ls1. Sounds awesome, not excessive and on throttle enough to let the lollipop lady ur around! Great system and good gains. Pick the system up for 450-500.


    CHIRP THIRD CAUSE U CAN

  16. #16
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_An_Abba_Fan View Post
    The 'X' pipe of an X force or that one in the picture isn't really an X pipe. It is exactly as soop said, just two bends cut and welded.

    A true X pipe is actually pressed so that the pipework forms an X the same diameter right through the bends, like this

    A true X pipe will scavenge better and improve acceleration if fitted in the correct position for the engine. How it does this is cross the exhaust pulse over to the other bank and pull the next pulse along behind it, increasing exhaust velocity.
    And I'll bet that X pipe costs as much as a whole Xforce exhaust system!!
    It's also very relative to where the Xpipe is positioned in relation to the manifolds and the design of the manifolds. Very precision piece if you ask me. Worth it for a race car, almost impossible to get a really decent difference on a streeter.

    My opinion, not certified fact.

    Don't get me wrong either, I'm not trying to be an elitist twit pushing the more expensive product. But with these things you really really do get what you pay for.

  17. #17
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    That particular X pipe is $250.

    I experimented with the position on our Senator, going by the best dyno IE: seat of the pants.

    First, when we got the car it had the X force style system on it, the first thing I did was piss the rear reso off, made it louder of course. The car felt like it had less accelration up top than it should have had, so I put a true twin on with a H pipe. Lost a lot of bottom end, but the top end got a lot better.

    Step two, I then fitted the X pipe just behind the cats, picked up a heap of bottom end but lost a bit of top. Just didn't pull as hard past 4500rpm.

    Step 3, got rid of the mufflers and moved the X pipe back there, and ran the pipes out behind each wheel with a hotdog on each side. Smoothed out the acceleration and gained a bit more top end, but it still felt like it was held up. Removed the hot dogs as they were off a VE SSV and the internals looked a bit smaller than 2 1/2".

    So in the end the exhaust system is now Pacemaker tri Y's and stock HSV cats (on the car when we bought it) twin 2 1/2" into a X pipe just in front of the diff, then a 2 1/2" pipe out behind each back wheel. The difference was noticeable straight away, good hard acceleration right to redline, and it get's there quickly too. All this on the stock Senator 250kW tune.

    On a side note, fuel consumption went from 12-13L per 100 when we first got it down to now getting 8.5-9L per 100 (highway).
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  18. #18
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Have you played with the pacemaker H-pipe at all?
    I've no idea how they compare with just straight pipes but my car seems to go alright, top end isn't top end bad either.

    Got any sound files of it?

  19. #19
    walesy's Avatar
    walesy is offline Aint no family cruiser!!!
    Ride
    Cherry Black WH II Caprice, VS exec wagon

    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Perth SOR
    Posts
    2,257

    Default

    twin 3in with hotdogs = win, twin 2.5in always sounds shit IMO, not enough of a deep note
    YouTube - WAL3SY goin nuts
    Going where no late model stato/caprice has gone before.... GAME ON!!

  20. #20
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Yeah that goes pretty well for a statesman ahah!

    Frankly I think its more to do with the mufflers the the pipe diameter with regards to sound quality.

  21. #21
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soop View Post
    Have you played with the pacemaker H-pipe at all?
    I've no idea how they compare with just straight pipes but my car seems to go alright, top end isn't top end bad either.

    Got any sound files of it?
    No I haven't, but it works not only because of the spirals in them, but because they are "pinched" sort of. It works like a venturi, as the exhaust flows through it, it speeds up coming out the back of it.

    No sound file yet, but I will put one up one day, I seem to get that request a lot lately.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  22. #22
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Haha, Yeah that's How I understand it. They reduce a half inch or maybe 1/4 inch and works like a venturi.

    What's your opinion regarding the Pacemaker H pipe and the true X pipes?



    That's the pacemaker product for those that have NFI what I'm talking about. It's called a "V-tex"

  23. #23
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    Each has it merits in different applications. Where more torqure is required in the mid range (street car) I would go for the X pipe, but that's just me. The Pacemaker H pipe works well too, but on a dyno it may have a lower torque curve at lower rpm. Wouldn't be much in it though.

    Something to note though, any exhaust system is a restriction, the concept behind X pipes and those Pacey H pipes is to keep exhaust velocity at a maximum to reduce back pressure. Engines that run at maximum rpm like drag cars don't need an exhaust system, the pipes are tuned as an extension of the exhaust port and works in harmony with pulse reflection back through the intake, this is what achieves the result they want. An engine that is used for acceleration eg track cars, need some form of exhaust to achieve higher torque. Also, forced induction and NA require different setups as well.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  24. #24
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Yeah, you're opening a huge can of worms there mate!


    You said earlier that you have the Xpipe near the diff, how would it go with the V-tex after the cats as well?

  25. #25
    Trav Man's Avatar
    Trav Man is offline Ya gotta love a V8 mate
    Ride
    Black VX Berlina LS1

    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in this great southern land of OZ
    Posts
    40

    Default

    Why don't you just run a split twin system and forget the X/H pipe ??
    What differance would that make as I've been away from doing performance mods for a while ??
    I do what I do, Not because I have to, Not because I want to, But because I can

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. thoughts on exhaust improvements??
    By gregors in forum V6 Development And Modification
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-03-2010, 12:16 PM
  2. thoughts?
    By T-MaKK in forum Car Audio
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 29-07-2009, 07:24 PM
  3. New Exhaust. Thoughts?
    By anarklov3r in forum VN - VP Holden Commodore (1988 - 1993)
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 12-05-2009, 11:11 AM
  4. Your thoughts on the VE
    By monaro66 in forum VE Holden Commodore (2006 - ?)
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 03-09-2008, 04:23 PM
  5. my thoughts
    By hotholdens.com in forum Site Feedback / Site Problems
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 23-07-2005, 11:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72