Results 1 to 22 of 22
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By old mate

Thread: SSSL King Ultra Low springs being put in back of VT - S pack??

  1. #1
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default SSSL King Ultra Low springs being put in back of VT - S pack??

    hey guys,

    Used search function but couldn't find what i wanted.

    Got a VT-S pack so it has the kit and the FE2 suspension and shocks?
    Will the S-packs shocks be good enough to fit SSSL (king ultra lows) in the rear?
    Also curious with the kit how high off the ground it is going to be?

    thanks alot guys, getting them off a mate from the forums soon hopefully.



    here is a picture of his VZ which has stock suspension at the front and the SSSL's im buying off him.




    I think they will look better on the shape of a vt than a vz being dropped at the rear (i hope lol)

    UPDATED:

    Got springs installed by Pedders on weekend for $50. Guy said i 'need' new shocks.


    in the shop


    in the shop rear


    in the shop, clearance? lol



    outside, car dirty due to rain and muddy highway...


    outside on grass rear tyre. shoes to compare


    on my grass, shoes for comparison.


    sorry, couldn't fit the invisible caravan in the shot haha
    Last edited by JSTCOZ; 07-12-2010 at 07:33 PM.

  2. #2
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is online now VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    Um No and No.

    Standard shocks will not be fine for SSSL's you will need shortened shocks....and I'm sorry are you leaving FE2 in the front and putting SSSL in the rear???
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  3. #3
    Ride
    vt s pack

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    brisbane
    Posts
    291

    Default

    should be fine. may be a hard ride but for the time it should hold up.

    if hiting big and hard bumps in the road, ur springs could even fall out by not having the shorten shocks.
    saying that, i mean geting air and shit

  4. #4
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HamaTime View Post
    Um No and No.

    Standard shocks will not be fine for SSSL's you will need shortened shocks....and I'm sorry are you leaving FE2 in the front and putting SSSL in the rear???
    didnt think the s-pack had standard shocks, thought it had better ones for FE2. Any yeah leaving FE2 on the front. Don't have much money at all and mate was sellign these to me cheap. I will probs have them on for a week, cry, then get them off adn sell them to some other poor bastard. lol

    shouldnt be too bad for a few weeks though? mate was running them on stock shocks for a few weeks.

  5. #5
    nathanVY's Avatar
    nathanVY is offline need boost...
    Ride
    03 VY Calais, 99 VT Equipe

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Geelong, VIC
    Posts
    1,647

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JSTCOZ View Post
    didnt think the s-pack had standard shocks, thought it had better ones for FE2. Any yeah leaving FE2 on the front. Don't have much money at all and mate was sellign these to me cheap. I will probs have them on for a week, cry, then get them off adn sell them to some other poor bastard. lol

    shouldnt be too bad for a few weeks though? mate was running them on stock shocks for a few weeks.
    dude just keep your eyes out on ebay / save up and get SL all round. FE2 front, ssl rear is a bad combo....

  6. #6
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nathanVS View Post
    dude just keep your eyes out on ebay / save up and get SL all round. FE2 front, ssl rear is a bad combo....
    even ebay prices aint good for me lol. and they are SSS (ultra) lows. haha. I'll have them on for a week and probs change them back and sell them lol hopeully nto too much damage will be caused in a week

  7. #7
    showbags's Avatar
    showbags is offline Cheap,nasty&full o shit
    Ride
    VT Calais,F6E

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    geelong
    Posts
    1,017

    Default

    short shocks are a must with ultra lows. ultra lows look good on a vt, but sadly unless you want to replace your rear tyres every 10000 km's(even with camber kit), i'd go for super lows instead

  8. #8
    Hibbo_Jnr's Avatar
    Hibbo_Jnr is offline Livin' the minute...
    Ride
    1999 VT S-Pack

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    East Gippsland
    Posts
    80

  9. #9
    Ride
    vt s pack

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    brisbane
    Posts
    291

  10. #10
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is online now VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    L = Low
    SL = Super Low
    SSL = Ultra Low
    SSSL = Super Dooper Low

    FE2 Does have different shocks, different springs and I think slightly bigger swaybars? Correct me if I'm wrong.

    If you want these in your VT, you will need new shocks. Otherwise the rebound of the shock will pop the spring out.

    I'm all for personal style, but to be honest, having SSSL in the rear with FE2 up front like that VZ will look like arse on a bad day....Sorry but it is going to look stupid, not to mention have a terrible ride...
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  11. #11
    Grennan's Avatar
    Grennan is offline Slayer of Stupid Threads
    Ride
    Manual VX SS SII

    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Glen Waverley, Victoria
    Posts
    1,351

    Default

    SL = Same as FE2
    SSL = Superlows.
    SSSL = Ultra lows.

    I know thats how it used to be. Not sure if its still the same, I was just flicking through the catalouge and a lot of the ultra low springs have SSSL marked next to them however some of them also have SSL so Im guessing there are varying heights depending on model.
    - Black Manual VX SS Series II -



    Stealth Mode Activated


  12. #12
    HamaTime™'s Avatar
    HamaTime™ is online now VIP Member
    Ride
    97 - VS S
    Operation Tiger Champion! Marble Mayhem Champion! Spacerunner 2 Champion! Triathlon Champion!
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    1,541

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Grennan View Post
    varying heights depending on model.
    Probably the case.
    1997 VS II - S

    Stage II Auto: Pacemakers & 2.25 Hi Flo: VT Brakes: Lowered: Spaced & Insulated




  13. #13
    Jesterarts's Avatar
    Jesterarts is offline Your freedom ends where mine begins
    Ride
    2005 HSV Z R8 Manual

    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Mornington, VIC
    Posts
    3,149

    Default

    I was pretty sure that Kings L springs were comparable FE2. SL was lower than FE2 when I put them in my old VX.

    I think the confusion is around the people calling springs "Ultra low" It's jsut easier to go off part numbers.

    Going on the latest Kings catalogue.

    Super lows are SL, Ultra low are SSL and SSSL are just SSSL.

    Quote from catalogue:

    Quote Originally Posted by KINGS
    Super Low springs lower vehicle approximately 10-20mm lower than normal Low Ultra Low a further 10-20mm again.
    To the OP,

    If you put SSSL's in the rear of a VT you will have so much negative camber it's not even funny. Keep in mind that if you put those in and don't want to get new tyres every 2 minutes you will want to invest in a 4 poiint camber kit. Though this will only help the issue not correct it. VT Rear ends are messed up.

    Hope that helps

  14. #14
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    got them in for $50 at Pedders. Pedders guy said that i dont 'need' shocks.

    sits very low and has the invisible caravan look but looks better on a vt than a vz haha.

    Last edited by JSTCOZ; 06-12-2010 at 05:28 PM.

  15. #15
    Ride
    vx berlina s2

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    adelaide, south australia
    Posts
    84

  16. #16
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kyriacandro View Post
    so is going to super low with standard shocks ok ?
    bro im on SSSL and the pedders guys said its ok lol. but yes youll be fine mate

  17. #17
    Ride
    vx custom 600RR

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    melbourne
    Posts
    377

  18. #18
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by oska View Post
    why do you want to go so low ? its not a sports car ...
    mate giving springs away free and i wanted to try them out for giggles and a different experience (y). dont mind the look either LOL

  19. #19
    Ride
    A bicycle

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Gippsland, Victoria
    Posts
    745

    Default

    that looks gay as. in my opinion. needs moar low applied at front.

    i would have to punch myself in the testes if my car sat like that.

    invisible caravan is ghey.
    Quote Originally Posted by QuickVRII95 View Post
    Elaborate, For All Of Us... How The Hell Is A Commodore A Friggin 4-Stroke...???
    Quote Originally Posted by NonStick Squid View Post
    @old mate you drive a vs ute therefore you're a bogan therefore your point is invalid

  20. #20
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by old mate View Post
    that looks gay as. in my opinion. needs moar low applied at front.

    i would have to punch myself in the testes if my car sat like that.

    invisible caravan is ghey.
    Once again i ain't keeping it lol, just testign it out and it was cheap as. just something different to keep me entertained (y). If i wanted the front lower than itd cost alot and i dont have money lol also parkign would be a bitch =/

  21. #21
    Ride
    A bicycle

    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Gippsland, Victoria
    Posts
    745

    Default

    how does it ride with them in? on the bump stops?
    Quote Originally Posted by QuickVRII95 View Post
    Elaborate, For All Of Us... How The Hell Is A Commodore A Friggin 4-Stroke...???
    Quote Originally Posted by NonStick Squid View Post
    @old mate you drive a vs ute therefore you're a bogan therefore your point is invalid

  22. #22
    Ride
    2000 VT S-Pack II

    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    SE Queensland
    Posts
    625

    Default

    going from FE2's at the back to having these. You feel a few more bumps and definately want to avoid pot holes (but everyone usually does regarless of springs) speedbumps go on a bit of an angle if need be and take slowly. can get up gutters parrallel(ish) and just go slow. Really not that worse than having inthe FE2's. Car parks with insane speedbumprs suck, but besides that I havent felt much different on highway or anything, few drops feel a little bit more 'few that was close' but nothign serious. Plus once you go down a road, you know if you can use it again and havent come across any i wouldn't go through yet (y)


Similar Threads

  1. KHRL 46 SSSL King springs
    By VL-EXEC in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 28-04-2010, 09:11 PM
  2. [SA] IRS King Springs SSSL
    By NORTI in forum Parts And Other Items For Sale
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 18-02-2010, 08:35 PM
  3. [SA] Swap IRS King SSSL (ultra) for super low springs
    By NORTI in forum Swap / Wanted to Buy / Trade
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-09-2009, 09:13 PM
  4. king springs sssl
    By trentvy in forum The Pub
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 18-08-2009, 09:28 PM
  5. [VIC] [FOR SALE] 2 X SSSL king springs and 2 X SSL king springs
    By UPLAWS in forum Parts And Other Items For Sale
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 19-03-2009, 06:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72