Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 74

Thread: The Panel or Pod Test!!

  1. #1
    impulsive's Avatar
    impulsive is offline Alloytec Racing
    Ride
    VZ Alloytec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    1,794

    Default The Panel or Pod Test!!

    Well i found a pod filter lying around the shed, i think it came off the old VR i used to have. Decided to whack it on the alloytec to see what all this induction noise is everyone talks about. Verdict, tiny bit with the engine open, at about 4500rpm, it gives a nice like suck.

    After a bit of a healthy flog down the road. Not noticing anything at the wheels i looked down to see an astonishing 32l/100km :O i nearly pushed the car home there and then.

    As i am a facts and figures kind of guy, im going to honestly tell you that the pod filter does bugger all at my feet, i dont get much induction sound and after resetting the L/100km i went back to my normal 11 - 12l.

    im going to leave it on over the next few day's to test the 'pod gives better fuel' theory people also harp on, i will update my l/100km over the next few day's if i see an improvement it will stay.
    Life starts at 200km/h

  2. #2
    Ride
    VZ Acclaim

    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Brisbane,QLD
    Posts
    105

  3. #3
    WogBoyz's Avatar
    WogBoyz is offline Cammed & Eventualy Blown!
    Ride
    08 VE SSV Ute

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cairns, Qld
    Posts
    2,620

    Default

    Is it in an enclsoure?

    Now Saving for a Harrop HTV2300 Supercharger kit!
    Quote Originally Posted by skyracer View Post
    On new years eve I got stopped by a pack of about 5 people forming a road block. All of them naked. They proceeded to turkey slap my car as I rolled past...

  4. #4
    richardpalinkas's Avatar
    richardpalinkas is offline Blown Alloytec
    Ride
    Raptor Impulse VZ SV6

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,422

  5. #5
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    32/100?? wtf. A filter is a filter. unless you undid something that meters air or fuel then that doesn't make much sense. You didn't look at the immediate fuel consumption at WOT did you???

  6. #6
    WogBoyz's Avatar
    WogBoyz is offline Cammed & Eventualy Blown!
    Ride
    08 VE SSV Ute

    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Cairns, Qld
    Posts
    2,620

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richardpalinkas View Post
    no enclosure
    should have an enclosure to see the better results, a panel filter works better then a pod when its not enclosed, once enclosed works better then a panel

    Now Saving for a Harrop HTV2300 Supercharger kit!
    Quote Originally Posted by skyracer View Post
    On new years eve I got stopped by a pack of about 5 people forming a road block. All of them naked. They proceeded to turkey slap my car as I rolled past...

  7. #7
    richardpalinkas's Avatar
    richardpalinkas is offline Blown Alloytec
    Ride
    Raptor Impulse VZ SV6

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,422

    Default

    my theory is... having the standard intake system, whether it be 2 hole mod or mcai, the air has to travel through the airbox inlet, through the filter and then back through the outlet to the maf, where as the pod it only has to go through the filter then the maf. in saying that, i think the pod would be benificial in the sense that the engine will not work as hard to get the air it needs, which should in theory reduce fuel consumption. if the pod was in an enclosure, it would be even better.


    Spoken by a true member of The Committee

  8. #8
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    WTF!?

    How do you think the engine has to work harder to draw air through a panel filter!
    It totally depends on the element quality and design plus filter surface area. Not what shape it is. The only reason you would want a pod is if you've no room due for an airbox due to intercooler pipe work or the likes.

  9. #9
    Ride
    VE SV6 ute

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    vic
    Posts
    1,619

    Default

    When I installed my headers, the computer was reading 99l/100km, in reality it wasn't, after a few days it came back to normal, then improved. Same with the CAI I installed, get much better fuel eco, as the stock boxes on the VE's are quite restrictive.

  10. #10
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

  11. #11
    richardpalinkas's Avatar
    richardpalinkas is offline Blown Alloytec
    Ride
    Raptor Impulse VZ SV6

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,422

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soop View Post
    WTF!?

    How do you think the engine has to work harder to draw air through a panel filter!
    It totally depends on the element quality and design plus filter surface area. Not what shape it is. The only reason you would want a pod is if you've no room due for an airbox due to intercooler pipe work or the likes.
    dunno, makes sense in my head, shortens the intake run. not that it has to work harder to draw in through the panel filter itself, but the box! the panel filter is fine and more likely flows enough, but the airbox itself looks as if it would reduce the flow of air, in terms of how smooth the airflow is


    Spoken by a true member of The Committee

  12. #12
    richardpalinkas's Avatar
    richardpalinkas is offline Blown Alloytec
    Ride
    Raptor Impulse VZ SV6

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Gold Coast
    Posts
    1,422

    Default

    get a vacuum cleaner and look at the hose. if you suck straight from the hose at the end, it has the most power in sucking, where as if you had a chamber that is not symetrical, the airflow is disrupted in that chamber (airbox)


    Spoken by a true member of The Committee

  13. #13
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    The volume of the air box is sufficient enough for the displacement of the engine. Sure, you might make 2hp more with no intake on it at all, you will gain exactly squat from playing with filters and holes in an air box, with an asthmatic 3.6ltr V6.

  14. #14
    abg
    abg is offline
    Ride
    05 VZ v6

    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    40

    Default

    It's hard to judge the performance of an airbox, intake pipe or air filter just by looking at it. Really the only way to find if there are any significant restrictions in the intake system, and if so where they are, is to test the pressure drop in various parts of the system with a manometer or the like. Autospeed has some very good articles on testing intake systems which would be a good first port of call for anyone serious about upgrading the intake system.

  15. #15
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    run a car on any dyno, then do the same test with no intake on it.

    Been there done that, noticed minimal difference.

  16. #16
    Ride
    VE SV6 ute

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    vic
    Posts
    1,619

    Default

    I did back to back tests with an airhammer CAI, difference was 6rwkw and a fair margin in torque untuned. Monaro327 had similiar gains. And my ECU hadn't been reset, it showed 99l/100km for a few minutes.

  17. #17
    Ride
    VE SV6 ute

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    vic
    Posts
    1,619

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by richardpalinkas View Post
    get a vacuum cleaner and look at the hose. if you suck straight from the hose at the end, it has the most power in sucking, where as if you had a chamber that is not symetrical, the airflow is disrupted in that chamber (airbox)
    Yeah sounds logical to me. plenty of people have the dyno's to prove it, don't see what the big fuss is about.

  18. #18
    impulsive's Avatar
    impulsive is offline Alloytec Racing
    Ride
    VZ Alloytec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soop View Post
    32/100?? wtf. A filter is a filter. unless you undid something that meters air or fuel then that doesn't make much sense. You didn't look at the immediate fuel consumption at WOT did you???
    im just ab asic guy, can you explain WOT?

    the pod has no inclosure, attatched directly to the maf, im wondering what difference a Pod enclosure would actually make, yes it may draw 'hotter' then normal air temps at idle but my thoughts would be it has access to more cooler air at speed. Ive never been much of a fan of Pod Filters enclosed or not, im more of an otr kinda guy i think.

    As for the fuel consumption, it was after approx 5 minutes of driving. This morning when i arrived to work it read just shy of 20L/100. leaving work with the stop start traffic hit a massive 24.2L/100km. once it opened up went down to 15L/100 then at home 13L/100.
    Life starts at 200km/h

  19. #19
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kuzman89 View Post
    Yeah sounds logical to me. plenty of people have the dyno's to prove it, don't see what the big fuss is about.
    Prove it....
    All you've had so far is comments, with no back up information.
    Quote Originally Posted by impulsive View Post
    im just ab asic guy, can you explain WOT?

    the pod has no inclosure, attatched directly to the maf, im wondering what difference a Pod enclosure would actually make, yes it may draw 'hotter' then normal air temps at idle but my thoughts would be it has access to more cooler air at speed. Ive never been much of a fan of Pod Filters enclosed or not, im more of an otr kinda guy i think.

    As for the fuel consumption, it was after approx 5 minutes of driving. This morning when i arrived to work it read just shy of 20L/100. leaving work with the stop start traffic hit a massive 24.2L/100km. once it opened up went down to 15L/100 then at home 13L/100.
    Yeah, that setup wont help anything. WOT means wide open throttle. There could be any manner of reasons for the fuel consumption issue. Shite filter/hot air being among them.

  20. #20
    Ride
    VE SV6 ute

    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    vic
    Posts
    1,619

    Default

    Will do, starting with mine... will scan dyno sheets when I'm at uni... 142 rwkw to 149 rwkw

  21. #21
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    Dyno sheets don't prove anything. Show me it was due to the intake and not having the temp sensor moved. Its less then 10kw and you expect me to believe that a dyno is that accurate everytime?
    I've driven allot of cars, and fiddled with just as many, never have I seen an fuggin hole in the airbox or pod filter make any difference. ever. Your V6 isn't any better.

  22. #22
    impulsive's Avatar
    impulsive is offline Alloytec Racing
    Ride
    VZ Alloytec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soop View Post
    Dyno sheets don't prove anything. Show me it was due to the intake and not having the temp sensor moved. Its less then 10kw and you expect me to believe that a dyno is that accurate everytime?
    I've driven allot of cars, and fiddled with just as many, never have I seen an fuggin hole in the airbox or pod filter make any difference. ever. Your V6 isn't any better.
    how isnt a dyno sheet enough proof?? it shows the car has gained power, which is what we are all about here?
    Life starts at 200km/h

  23. #23
    impulsive's Avatar
    impulsive is offline Alloytec Racing
    Ride
    VZ Alloytec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by kuzman89 View Post
    Will do, starting with mine... will scan dyno sheets when I'm at uni... 142 rwkw to 149 rwkw
    is that 7kw from a pod filter? lol
    Life starts at 200km/h

  24. #24
    soop is offline Banned
    Ride
    2003 SS Commodore Series II

    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Posts
    3,851

    Default

    You can dodge the dyno just by moving the intake temp sensor. And less then 10kw can be put down to a small difference in any number of variables.

  25. #25
    impulsive's Avatar
    impulsive is offline Alloytec Racing
    Ride
    VZ Alloytec

    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, QLD
    Posts
    1,794

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by soop View Post
    You can dodge the dyno just by moving the intake temp sensor. And less then 10kw can be put down to a small difference in any number of variables.
    where is the intake temp sensor located on an alloytec mate?
    Life starts at 200km/h

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. test
    By drben69 in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 21-07-2010, 08:45 PM
  2. Air Filters K&N Panel VS Lukey Panel
    By BullittSV6 in forum The Pub
    Replies: 35
    Last Post: 18-06-2010, 05:21 PM
  3. test....
    By rattattack1313 in forum The Pub
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 17-08-2005, 04:32 AM
  4. tk test
    By roy38 in forum VT - VX Holden Commodore (1997 - 2002)
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 15-07-2005, 08:54 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72