Well, I did some dyno testing last weekend.
Results are in, NO MAF = BETTER AFR'S AND MORE POWER.
Can't wait to get the baby piggybacked and tuned, should be finally unlocking some HFV6 Potential!
WITHOUT MAF
With MAF.
So there we goDyno proven
![]()
wow! that thing gets rich up top, eh?! i am having probs with my MAF(i suspect) on my ecotec, i have a new one there yet to put on, i'll do that, fit my rockers and jump on the dyno again......i reckon i can see your 136-odd Kw with my MAF in place![]()
Yes, but this is a stock engine, minus MAF. Unopened. Only mod is a Twin 2.5" catback and a hot air intake ;p (Unshielded pod in bay)
Mine's not actually a Mafless tune. That's just the maf removed. No tune at all.Originally Posted by highendrev
Re: The piggyback memcal, let me know how you go power wise, Im leaning towards the HKS Fcon SZ + Navigator.
ahhh, i didnt know you were running with a stock tune.....i reckon if you pulled some of that fuel out up top to flatten that AFR line, you would pick up a shitload of power mate
Yeah I know. Piggyback timeOriginally Posted by EcotecManiac
![]()
Originally Posted by benzor
so what have you just pulled out maf and then just drive. has the car played up at all
thanks
It beeps "Check powertrain", but runs fine. I know the auto's will run in limp home mode.Originally Posted by wgs150
Ive had it backfire on 42+ degree days, but only twice.
Basically, unplug maf. remove maf. reset PCM (20 minutes), drive car hard to relearn. See how you go performance wise
You will need something to bridge the gap from where the MAF was.. Im just running a pod ATM, but ill work something better when I have time.
for 3rwkw its not worth the hassle, it's un noticable power in the end, and with the car not liking it, it cant be good
basically what you are doing is showing how good the backup tables in the tune are.
Rob
You said 136.6kw without maf,and VZSV6 said in a old post 145kwhttp://forums.justcommodores.com.au/showthread.php?t=13687.Originally Posted by benzor
![]()
You said 136.6kw without maf,and VZSV6 said in a old post 145kw. #4 22-08-2005, 11:56 PMOriginally Posted by benzor
VZSV6
Ride: N/A
Posts: 100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i have 183.6rwhp, around 145rwkw
![]()
Yeah they did a test on one in motor and it got 154.X rwkw, so much for production tolerances
I think this would uleash a lot of power what do you think?i think they use the motec system on the f4000 hfv6 190's,probably turbo no drama at all,cost a bit though.Originally Posted by benzor
28110
MoTeC
$3,527.70
The MoTeC M800 is one of the most powerful Engine Management Systems on the market today, offering sophisticated controls for today's highly evolved engines.
Offering eight injector drivers and eight ignition outputs, the MoTeC M800 is ideal for running sequential injection and multicoil ignition systems on engines up 8 cylinders,
Developed with high performance road cars and racing enthusiasts in mind, the M800 delivers an extensive package of standard features including; a 32 bit microprocessor, Narrowband Lambda control, and eight auxiliary outputs for functions such as 3D boost control, nitrous injection, intercooler spray bars, shift lights and warning alarms to name a few.
Optional features available include; Traction Control, Gear Change Ignition Cut, Variable Cam Control, Drive By Wire throttle control, Wideband Lambda sensor* and Data Logging.
Using MoTeCs Windows based ECU Manager software, the M800 system offers advanced technology and is our top-of-the-line series with an impressive package of standard and optional features.
![]()
so I got 152RWKW in my 98VT with the maf in place ,
ohhh ahhhh ....PS i had a run with an SV6 manual the other night
poor bugger didnt see which way i went.....
he probably let you go.Originally Posted by SLugg
g'day slugg,Originally Posted by SLugg
152Kw at the rears....98 VT V6? what did you have done to it? was it auto or manual?
Hi there,
Looking at the graphs, they seem to be identical in every shape and form
however the one running the maf runs an intake temp of 29 degrees and the
mafless runs intake temp of 42 degrees with both having the same ambient
air temp??????
What could possibly be causing a rise of 13 degrees in intake temp?
Was the probe positioned in a different place and if so why?.
As we know an increase intake air temp on a Dyno Dynamics dyno will yield
a higher power reading, so in conclusion i believe that the mafless tune would
show the same if not a lower power figure if these intake air temp perimeters were the same.
This is the beauty of there latest software, the mighty keyboard can give you any figure you desire.
Ecotec maniac your absolutely correct in saying that a leaner A/F mix would
yield heap more power, but unfortunately this is the factoty's way of reducing
cylinder combustion temperature in order of reducing Nox emissions.
Cheers Lou.
Look closer Lou... They are differentOriginally Posted by Blue-Chip
![]()
Originally Posted by VX_KN079
Hi VX_KN079,
Based on the ramp rate used, the graph can look staggered or smoothed and i believe that this may be the only difference.
If i am missing something, please tell me what it is.![]()
Cheers Lou.
you wish , he chirped hard leaving the line , I didnt go till i was sure he was havin a go , they dont make that much power std mine has 210KWAFWOriginally Posted by VZSV6
he didnt try at the next set of lights in fact was quite sheepish about even looking over LOL some much money so little power
So how much money have you spent on your vt to get it to have just 20fwkw more than an sv6?? Because i dont think people have spent 28 to 40 odd thousand on an sv6 because of its power..
$5800 to go from 95KW ATRW to 152KW ATRW N/AOriginally Posted by QuIcKsV6