Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Faulty Speedometers & the law

  1. #1
    Ride
    '05 VZ SV6 M6 - Quicksilver

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ryde, NSW
    Posts
    17

    Default Faulty Speedometers & the law

    Hi
    Does anyone know where you stand with the law (NSW) if you're pinged for speeding and your speedometer is faulty

    I recently drove to melbourne & back and noticed that the tacho reading was a bit higher than usual for 110kph. I switched to the digital readout & found the analog was reading up to 20kph lower than the digital readout (see attached pics). I ended up using my GPS speed reading to make sure what I was seeing was right.

    The car is now down at the local Holden dealer getting checked out

    Hopefully I don't see any infringement notices coming through in the next couple of weeks.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Faulty Speedometers & the law-vz2.jpg   Faulty Speedometers & the law-vz3.jpg  

  2. #2
    88GreenVN's Avatar
    88GreenVN is offline Almost not here!
    Ride
    88 Green VN Wagon 389,000kms

    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Deep South - VN Country
    Posts
    6,247

    Default

    If you went through a radar and were over the limit => fine

    It's up to as far as the law is concerned regarding accuracy. Lucky you may have found the issue before you got a fine (20k's out is a problem)
    White 05 V6 VZ Executive - Thrashed Ex Telstra car
    and 3 Dangerous non ABS VN's

  3. #3
    Ride
    VZ Skaife Senator & VY SS UTE

    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Posts
    801

  4. #4
    ashbox's Avatar
    ashbox is offline 6 speed
    Ride
    VZ SS 6 Spd

    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    The Car
    Posts
    1,083

    Default

    that would just be a software issue wouldn't it?
    Chev badges are an instant fail

  5. #5
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    It is the owner's responsibility to make sure their car was roadworthy.

    Same as an exhaust. If it isn't quiet enough you will get pulled over, you can't use the excuse that it is faulty....
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  6. #6
    Ride
    '05 VZ SV6 M6 - Quicksilver

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ryde, NSW
    Posts
    17

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by ashbox View Post
    that would just be a software issue wouldn't it?
    Well that's all they said they did when I got the car back today. Said it was out of date but they couldn't replicate the problem prior to that. If it happens again they said they'll just replace the whole instrument cluster.

  7. #7
    Ride
    VXII SS M6 & Leather

    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Warrnambool
    Posts
    484

    Default

    as above - its your responsibilty to make sure your car is rwc and your speedo is accurate.
    you could try and write a letter and explain what happened if you get a fine, but dont expect them to care.

  8. #8
    Ride
    VZ EQUIPE

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    46

    Default

    You can use the law "Mistake of fact" At the time of the offence you were using a device (speedo) to tell you how fast you were going.

    You were using all the resources available to you at the time to gauge your speed. Your senses, your speedo and other vehicles travelling around you.

    Now if your constantly overtaking other vehicles (and at 20 kilometres you would have) then you would have to question your speed.

    Depending on your driving experiance, you can normally tell your speeding just by the feel of the vehicle moving.

    You have noticed something wrong because of the tacho being higher, so you register that something is wrong.

    You have put the vehicle into the repair shop to rectifiy the identified fault.

    Now if you can justify your response to an infringement, given all the available resources at your disposal, then you will get off the infringement with "Mistake of fact"

    But only if your justification is really good.

    20 kilometres over, its going to be a real stretch.

  9. #9
    Ride
    VZ SV6

    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Bayside Melbourne
    Posts
    58

    Default

    I wouldn't show the judge the "115km/h" photo......... Don't think there are any roads in the eastern states that are over 110km/h

  10. #10
    tigervh is offline SS.....smokin....!
    Ride
    Tiger Mica EFI VH, VZ SS, XC Barina SRI

    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Newcastle
    Posts
    229

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by policehoon View Post
    You can use the law "Mistake of fact" At the time of the offence you were using a device (speedo) to tell you how fast you were going.

    Now if you can justify your response to an infringement, given all the available resources at your disposal, then you will get off the infringement with "Mistake of fact"

    What a load of crap! In NSW all traffic offences are strict liability meaning there is no mensrea component to them. Hence if you exceed the speed limit you are guilty of an offence, whether you knew you were doing it or not. You might get some leniency from the magistrate but you won't get off.

    Even if he does go to court, whats he going to do? Subpeona the person who checked the speedo to give evidence that there was nothing wrong with it when he checked it!!!
    Last edited by tigervh; 11-04-2009 at 10:10 PM.
    My Garage:
    VZ SS 6ltr 6 speed silver
    VN 5ltr 5 speed Gold (Ex NSWPF Highway Patrol)
    VH EFI 5ltr Supra 5 speed tiger mica
    XC Barina SRI 1.8ltr 5 speed silver

  11. #11
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    Exactly, ignorance is not an excuse. Not knowing about something doesn't make you exempt from the consequences.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  12. #12
    Ride
    '05 VZ SV6 M6 - Quicksilver

    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Ryde, NSW
    Posts
    17

    Default

    so far no speeding fine in the mail...been about a month now. readings still vary by about 5km either way but not as bad as before. anyway, looking to get rid of the car soon & replace it with a 2nd hand Monaro CV8-Z

  13. #13
    Ride
    VYS1SPAK

    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by tigervh View Post
    What a load of crap! In NSW all traffic offences are strict liability meaning there is no mensrea component to them. Hence if you exceed the speed limit you are guilty of an offence, whether you knew you were doing it or not. You might get some leniency from the magistrate but you won't get off.

    Even if he does go to court, whats he going to do? Subpeona the person who checked the speedo to give evidence that there was nothing wrong with it when he checked it!!!
    Correct, there is no need to prove that the person knew that they were speeding. The offence of speed can be committed and you are guilty even if you thought that you were not.

    Strange thing is that a non working speedo is not defectable!

  14. #14
    Ride
    VZ EQUIPE

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atuclb View Post
    Correct, there is no need to prove that the person knew that they were speeding. The offence of speed can be committed and you are guilty even if you thought that you were not.

    Strange thing is that a non working speedo is not defectable!
    I didnt say that we had to prove if the offending driver knew he was speeding, just that the offending driver has to prove to the magistrates court that he was not.

    As my last post said 20 kilometres over the speed limit, I seriously doubt he could prove he was not.

  15. #15
    Not_An_Abba_Fan's Avatar
    Not_An_Abba_Fan is offline Exhaust Guru
    Ride
    HSV Senator VTII

    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Bunbury, WA
    Posts
    9,104

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by atuclb View Post
    Strange thing is that a non working speedo is not defectable!
    It is in WA.
    Visit my Facebook page



    Quote Originally Posted by DannyboyDS View Post
    I burnt my hand in a nasty way once using method one but thats because i'm a twat.

  16. #16
    Ride
    VZ Berlina

    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    221

    Default

    As the previous posters have said you are responsible for the road worthiness of your vehicle and that includes the speedometer being out of calibration.
    Ignorance as an excuse will not hold up in court.

  17. #17
    1991_Vn2nV's Avatar
    1991_Vn2nV is offline Donating Member
    Ride
    91 VN Berlina & 03 VY Berlina

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Gumeracha, Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    8,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Not_An_Abba_Fan View Post
    It is in WA.
    And SA. It is an ADR requirement that the speedo be within 10% accuracy so it is in fact defectable nation wide.

  18. #18
    Exidor's Avatar
    Exidor is offline I come in peace.
    Ride
    Used Martian spacecraft

    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Earth. For now....
    Posts
    329

    Default

    Quite a few years ago now, the then Victorian Police Commisioner
    said publicly the police would give you a margin of 10% plus 3 kph
    over the posted speed limit.
    Fast forward to the 21st century and the 'Safety Camera' and the 'Speed Kills'
    mentality (we should all be dead!).
    You now have to keep one eye on the speedo and one eye on the road which
    is not possible.
    What the margin is now? One can only guess it's much lower!
    I'll stop my rant now!
    Last edited by Exidor; 09-07-2009 at 04:35 PM.
    I'm not afraid.

  19. #19
    HoldenOnn's Avatar
    HoldenOnn is offline Roll Cage Territory
    Ride
    VZ Calais Alloytec190

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Busselton, WA
    Posts
    513

    Default

    It is an ADR requirement that speedos be within 10% accuracy...that is correct. But this is only from the factory. After it has left the factory and been sold off the dealer showroom floor, the responsibilty is then with the owner of the vehicle.

    Just like maintaining a car with roadworthy tyres, lights that work correctly etc, its up to the owner to make sure that his or her speedo is accurate. In previous years it was harder and more costly to check speedometers. It could have been done with a vehicle dyno, or at a police checkpoint every so often when they would put up a speed checking sign with a radar.

    But now, there is no excuse with the price of GPS units that give you an accurate speed reading, plus alot of phones even come with a GPS which is another method of checking.

    As with anything on a car, it is all up to the owner to maintain and check and make sure everything is working as it should and in roadworthy condition. Nothing is failsafe and we can't expect things to work perfectly throughout their lifespan.

  20. #20
    Ride
    VZ EQUIPE

    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Posts
    46

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by satos View Post
    As the previous posters have said you are responsible for the road worthiness of your vehicle and that includes the speedometer being out of calibration.
    Ignorance as an excuse will not hold up in court.
    Ignorance as a defence will not hold up in court but "Mistake of fact" will.

    Has it been used in court to get out of a speeding fine???????.

    I have not read any case law to say it has been used to acquit the offending driver.

  21. #21
    HoldenOnn's Avatar
    HoldenOnn is offline Roll Cage Territory
    Ride
    VZ Calais Alloytec190

    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Busselton, WA
    Posts
    513

    Default

    A speedometer is a mechanical device and is basically a "gauge" of what speed you are indicated to be doing. It is not a precise instrument that can be classed as displaying something regarded as "fact".

    The ADR regulations relating to speedometer tolerances basically back this up. Because something that has such a high tolerance allowable as 10% variance, should not be conceived as being 100% factual.
    Last edited by HoldenOnn; 16-07-2009 at 02:41 AM.

  22. #22
    1991_Vn2nV's Avatar
    1991_Vn2nV is offline Donating Member
    Ride
    91 VN Berlina & 03 VY Berlina

    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Gumeracha, Adelaide Hills
    Posts
    8,715

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by rodbol View Post
    What the margin is now? One can only guess it's much lower!
    I'll stop my rant now!
    In SA the margin was cut from 10% back to 5% last year.

Similar Threads

  1. Faulty CAS or ECU
    By werlegiggy in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 25-05-2008, 08:44 AM
  2. CTS Faulty?
    By kurt in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-02-2008, 11:34 AM
  3. Faulty Key?
    By DUK13Y in forum VY Holden Commodore (2002 - 2004)
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 08-11-2007, 05:32 PM
  4. Bcm Faulty
    By Skreem in forum VR - VS Holden Commodore (1993 - 1997)
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 27-12-2006, 07:59 AM
  5. VN S Tacho faulty
    By krazy_kitchen in forum VN - VP Holden Commodore (1988 - 1993)
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21-01-2005, 06:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72