Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

Search results

  1. J

    Low rwhp?

    Ok so that's where I went wrong I used the torque from the peak power not the maximum torque rpm thanks
  2. J

    Low rwhp?

    So the print out shows rpm 4550, torque at 4550 Rpm is 438 nm So 438 x 4550 / 9548 is 208.7 kW Or am I understanding the torque wrong When I did the 5252 calculation I converted nm to ft lb and then converted the Hp to kW
  3. J

    Interpreting Dyno results: RWNM, motive force etc.

    Some time ago I had a 308 that was rebuilt pretty stock slight cam increase and it made 118 RWKW
  4. J

    Advice needed on Dyno Results

    I cant upload photos so I will try and explain it Had my car dyno tuned on a chassis dyno it made 152.5 RWKW and 501.5 NM of torque. My question is at 4550 Rpm it made 152.5 RWKW and 438 NM of torque Now if I convert these figures to 204.5 RWHP and 323 Ft Lb I am led to believe that...
  5. J

    Low rwhp?

    501nm of torque 3.36 gearing stock converter, also if I do the maths and multiply the tourqe x revs divided by 5252 it tells me it should be 210kw at the wheels am I wrong in doing this calculation or is the Dyno report wrong
  6. J

    Low rwhp?

    It's got a dual plane edelbrock performer manifold, msd pro billet dizzy, blaster 3 coil, 12 degree initial 30 total timing
  7. J

    Low rwhp?

    Newly built 355 stroker, l34 heads equivalent 670 vac secondary carb, very mild cam 214/ 214 @ .50, zero decked 10.1 to 1 compression had it dynotuned and got a print out of 152.5 RWKW does this seem low
  8. J

    Do you still know where to get new Salisbury gearsets

    Do you still know where to get new Salisbury gearsets
Top