The only difference between the 2JZ-GE and 2JZ-GTE was oil squirters under the piston. The piston manufacturing process did not change.
The only difference between the 2JZ-GE and 2JZ-GTE was oil squirters under the piston. The piston manufacturing process did not change. lol
Do I REALLY have to clarify that or can your brain process that I'm talking about the ENGINE and not whats strapped onto it?
Toyota 2JZ-GTE Engine The most powerfull version of all JZ series, 2JZ GTE is best known for powering MK IV Toyota Supra. However originally it was built to homologate Toyota Aristo for the Japanese Grand Touring Car Championship (JGTC). 2JZ-GTE was based on the non-turbo inline-6 engine, 2JZ-GE. Same cast iron block and connecting rods were used, but 2JZ-GTE was updated with forged pistons that have 8.5:1 compression, a forged crankshaft , oil spray bars to increase cooling abilities of the pistons and most importantly sequential twin turbos. DOHC Aluminum alloy head was completely redesigned with bigger inlet and outlet ports, bigger valves, wilder cams. For better combustion efficiency at higher engine speeds, distributor was replaced with coil over plugs Just going by what toyota said.
I give up, you are all epic. This is all irrelevant information anyway because turbo ecotecs with stock internals still **** over even the toughest 2JZ/RB26/LS1/etc.
Your engine has about twice the capacity of a 2jz and more than double that of a 1jz and then you have NOS which is considered forced induction and your laughing at the amount of boost it takes to make 400rwkw. I doubt your motor is stock 5.7lt to make 400rwkw with 100hp shot of nos which is worth maybe 60rwkw. What was you quarter times? The balancing was reffering to the ED turbo which is why it was in seperate paragraph compared to the first statement which is talking about rod bolts in the 1jz VR Ute
Honestly, I still fail to see any proof behind what you're claiming, other then some noob telling me "he's vn cuts 11's". You say it's common knowledge but not to me so enlighten me... Because right now, regardless of whether it's true or false that a 2jz can handle 1000hp or the ecotec is the bees knees. I've seen more 1000hp+ Supras than 1000hp ecotecs, and the people claiming that the 2jz is the best motor ever and it can handle 5000hp and is unbreakable have just as much right to claim that as you do. Seriously, I'm not trying to argue, I really want to see a Ecotec making the power the 2jz do.
Slow down and take a breath so you can read the posts correctly.My BA does a 1.6 60 foot with no waiting at the tree.It had nothing to do with the 2J motor AT ALL. You must be blind as well as I have a wittle gween box,just the one.LOL! Hows that pride tasting mate?
You would think lol. Boost is boost though, could have easily been a turbo or blower instead of nitrous for the same result. Nitrous is just cheaper and easier.
Even my son who is nearly 9 had a laugh at this mate.Didnt you know that its the turbo Buicks that **** all over the other motors,geeeez,everyone knows this. Thread has been linked to a few forums for a good laugh.thanks guys.
So it run's 400rwkw down the strip once in a blue moon vs a car making 400rwkw all the time. No you won't be making peak power all the time, so don't give me the rubbish of having a 400rwkw combo then.
What? What cars making 400rwkw ALL the time? A turbo setup sure isn't, they hit boost once in a blue moon too. I know mine does. Just because a car CAN make that kind of power doesn't mean it is making it all the time.
I understand that, but a turbo setup is going to see full boost/power a hell of a lot more often then a nitrous setup.
