- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 22,622
- Reaction score
- 20,505
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Sth Auck, NZ
- Members Ride
- HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
Roller cams have more of a lumpy lobe where as flat tappets have more of an egg shape well one side of an egg and I guess the fat side of an egg is more like a roller cam. Rollers can't roll on a flat tapet as the point is too violent for the roller they need a nice smooth profile.
This leads to the square CM of area after intial lift and before final closing being more on a roller cam. A good flat tappet can out perform some roller cams but a good roller can't be beaten for mass air flow. But in most cases you don't need all the extra flow a roller cam provides so a flat tappet is fine to use they also sound a little more choppy imo which is what I prefer.
I like engines that sound like they're about to stall but keep on chuggin. Like a CAT RD6.
I know you have a hate for roller cams but don't put that on others. roller cams are more reliable than FT cams (due to modern engine oils which lack the additives FT cams like). Roller cams for the same given seat duration have more .050" duration and lift which gives better performance. A moderate hydro roller can make almost as much as the older solid FT cams without the hassles of a FT cam. FT cams are old school and have their place but his engine has a roller cam, going back to a FT cam is a step backwards.
Last edited: