I'd tell them to go fist f*ck themselves.
Public servants are in the public deal with it.
That and from my expiriences with midwives most of them are useless as tits on a bull so why fuggin distraction is there?
They stand around and watch unless theres and emergency. Who's going to film an emergency? (Who wants to film the delivery anyway, but thats not the issue).
Yep. Exactly, I wouldn't want to film the actual delivery, or I'd choose not to point the camera there....
was thinking the same thing.
however i can see where they are coming from. (read in the herald sun)
if complications arise, its caught on film. it can be distressing images (although cant it be destroyed?)
from what i read in the Herald Sun about it, the hospitals/doctors are getting sued because of complications and there has been video evidence.
and if doctors are worried it may show poor performance (within reason) and malpractice, then this should be fixed. and maybe it can keep the buggers honest about the malpractice.
but i still dont see why you would want to film it. to me that is pretty disgusting.
Banning for the sake of malpractice is a pretty poor excuse, if the doctor/hospital team are negligent or performing their job inappropriately or in the wrong fashion then it is up to the discretion of the person what they would do with the film. Freedom to film a very rare, special moment in your own life and the life of your family is important.
On principle I think it's wrong to ban it, if people want to film, go ahead, your baby.
As for the doctor's concern, staff privacy? It is private, if you don't want to be in the video, then stay out of the way of the camera or don't be there. Legal repercussions? Their making an issue out of something that isn't there. If they are negligent in delivery, their problem, if not, then all is fine!
Who would EVER want to see a whole person squeeze through a vagina? Let alone record it so they can watch it later...
Some people get a kick out of it...gynecologists for one.