VicCop
Member
- Joined
- Sep 9, 2006
- Messages
- 369
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 18
- Members Ride
- 2011 Commodore SV6 SII
they must be able to proove in court that you where speeding. no speed gun = no proof. moving car = no speed gun... no fine
its a technicallity but it works - i've done it
No speed detection = no proof? All the evidence that's required is the observations of police. Speed testing by means of a precribed device (laser, radar, digitector) are simply additional bits of evidence.
My evidence in a contested matter would go something like: "I observed the defendant travelling south east on the Monash Freeway through Dandenong at a fast rate of speed that I estimated as being 120 km/h. I followed behind the defendant, matched my speed to his, and followed him from Stud Road to Heatherton Road being a distance of approximately one kilometer. I then determined the speed of the defendant's vehicle to be 125 km/h between Stud Road and Heatherton Road."
Our cars these days, at least he Holdens, have the trap speed function on them. This enables us to trap the speed we're travelling at when clocking someone from a follow speed. This way the accused driver is able to inspect the speedo to see what speed they were snapped at.
Remember, police are considered by the courts to be expert witnesses when it comes to estimating speed. If I sit on the side of a road all day checking cars that are going 80 all the time then I start to know what doing 80 looks like. That way anyone doing more than that will stand out and I'll look and think, "That car's moving a bit quick, I reckon about 100". I then use a laser (prescribed device) to confirm my estimate.