Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.
I did use E10 in my VE SV6 for an extended period (probably about 100,000kms, before I realised it’s a rip off) and didn’t have any issues with it.I concur with all of the comments above and add to that a suggestion to generally avoid using E10. I know of a few examples where long term use of E10 correlated with cat converter and oxy sensor issues in parallel with examples where E10 was never used and no issues were encountered. We’re talking sustained use of E10 and VE’s above 150,000km so keep that in mind. The engine is compatible for E10. I have a 2007 VE with a shave short of 200,000km and run either 95 or 98.
I did tests over 100s of km and did fill to the brim and drove 100km and 200km a few times with a few different vehicles and 95 certainly gave better mileage over 91. Two friends I know that did the same thing said the same thing, one was a girl and girls are generally tight-arse with anything car related. But like I already said 98 really made no noticeable mileage over 95. None of those cars had anything except factory tunes except the ute, which is now gone and all my cars were designed to run on 91.My friend worked at the Mobil Port Stanvac refinery as an engineer before closure. He always said to use the fuel type your vehicle was designed for. You won't get any extra measured performance or distance using 98 in a motor designed and tuned for 91.
RAA says different -I did tests over 100s of km and did fill to the brim and drove 100km and 200km a few times with a few different vehicles and 95 certainly gave better mileage over 91. Two friends I know that did the same thing said the same thing, one was a girl and girls are generally tight-arse with anything car related. But like I already said 98 really made no noticeable mileage over 95. None of those cars had anything except factory tunes except the ute, which is now gone and all my cars were designed to run on 91.