monstar
Naturally as-pirated
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,476
- Reaction score
- 1,697
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 56
- Location
- depths of Hays Inlet
- Website
- facebook.com
- Members Ride
- Peugeot 207 GTi
Nothing really apart from rarity is sort of the opposite of ubiquity, but I'll try and break it down??? Please explain, not sure what it's sup post to mean ?
TL;DR the magic number is 1200. The hypothesis which follows is generally that more than 1200 of anything is not really rare, less is deemed quite rare.
The Australia Post Office by nature is a ubiquitous national icon representing the cadastral history of civilised development. As such also provides an identifiable reference to demonstrate how the population of [anything] unique in your street like a post box, is practically more common than unique to your postcode, which may be represented by a local post office.
To quantify that, the number of street posting boxes is around 16,000 vs post offices less than 1200. Something unique in your town / village (or neighbourhood) is somewhere in between, as there are 3200 Australia Post outlets local to metro shops and out in country pubs.
So a practical metric for rarity and the human population (being unique amongst your nearest neighbours), the number of [anything] scaled against the postal network describes the rarity value no matter within a metro region or the arid centre. Seems a better overall population distribution indicator than Police watchouse or pub.
In other words more or less [anything] nationally vs the number of post offices is a reasonable yardstick, a tipping point for weighing an item's initial rarity value without the need for detailed investigation.