Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

JC Political Thread - For all things political Part 2

Derekthetree

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2019
Messages
484
Reaction score
1,195
Points
93
Location
Victoria
Members Ride
Gen-F R8 SV Manual
So electoral college voted Biden in. This was the obviously predicted outcome. But it still does not mean there's not voting fraud.
Trump can still go to court to prove voter fraud.
What will it mean if he does prove this? It will mean Congress will have to do an inquiry into the voting system and it may get an overhaul.
But yes ol sleepy Joe will be the President for the next 4 years.
But I will tell you I bet Trump is building his own political party very soon.
He's been taking it to court for 6 week's, not got him anywhere yet.

You mean Biden for a month then he resigns to let Kamala take over. He might do it just to see all the Republicans explode.

A funny thought I saw is that Trump tried his own fraud (knobble the post office) and still lost that he's convinced Dems must have cheated even more. Luckily 3x recounts don't lie
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
2,168
Reaction score
687
Points
113
Age
32
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
He's been taking it to court for 6 week's, not got him anywhere yet.

You mean Biden for a month then he resigns to let Kamala take over. He might do it just to see all the Republicans explode.

A funny thought I saw is that Trump tried his own fraud (knobble the post office) and still lost that he's convinced Dems must have cheated even more. Luckily 3x recounts don't lie
 

Skydrol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
406
Reaction score
4,021
Points
93
Location
USA
Members Ride
Pontiac G8 GT
People love drama. Like Yogi Berra used to say... "Aint over until is over". Jan 20th is the day to swear the Presie in. A lot can happen between now and then. As I said countless times, not in favor not against, just an observant. At this point in US history, this case never happen before and are unchartered waters. There are digging deep in the Constitution which is the ultimate law of the land.

The fact is that voter fraud was commited, there is a large amount of witensses, hard evidence, video footage, sworn affidavits, etc... plenty enough to at least start an investigation. Why the courts are rejecting the evidence and cases is beyond me.


The 20th Amendment moves the date of inauguration from March to "noon on the 20th day of January."

Grab some crisps, some dip, get a beer, stay tuned, watch the show.
 

Skydrol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
406
Reaction score
4,021
Points
93
Location
USA
Members Ride
Pontiac G8 GT
Martin A Armstron is an Economist, he only analyzes data and facts. Here is in a nutshell. The rest is propaganda and biases.


QUESTION: How can you support Trump when he tried to overturn electoral college votes? That’s illegal and tyrannical.
WG

ANSWER: You are speaking out of your hatred for Trump. You should have looked at the issues rather than the people. This is not about Trump and you have just been manipulated into hating Trump so you will always support the opposite. The truth is, the Democrats in the House tried it in 2017 to strike Alabama’s votes for Donald Trump as they did regarding Georgia. Barbara Boxer tried to strike Ohio for George Bush back in 2005. If Trump does it, it is tyrannical. But if the Democrats do it, nobody says anything.


Look, Trump has not conceded because the Constitution maintains that the state legislators pick the electors, not the governor. In addition, the House of Representatives in combination with the United States Senate has the lawful authority to accept or reject Electoral College vote submissions. If there is confirmed fraud, they do not have to accept the electoral college.

To me, this entire election process is unconstitutional because there are no federal uniform requirements. This is a complete mess. No doubt you objected to the Electoral College in 2016. If we allocate the votes according to the popular vote, then Biden 63.5% (11,109,764) of the vote against Trump’s 34.3% (6,005,961). So it was California that put Biden over the 270 with its 55 votes. If you want a popular vote, then they should have allocated 19 votes to Trump.

I also warned that dead people routinely vote in Michigan and Chicago especially. A simple online voting system could easily be created, eliminating Dominion Voting, which was Canadian to begin with and it is cross-referenced to the tax records. If they are not filing taxes, then they do not vote. That eliminates duplicate voting, illegal aliens, and dead people. If you can buy from Amazon in a secure manner, why can’t we vote the same way? Then there can’t be allegations of fraud.

The refusal of the Supreme Court to hear the Texas case was an outrage and a disgrace to the nation and the world. Now both sides will forever claim they won and that means the ONLY solution will be violence. So, I suppose if you hate Trump that much, are you willing to risk your life in a street battle? For that day will come. Guess you better buy some ammo.
 

Skydrol

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
406
Reaction score
4,021
Points
93
Location
USA
Members Ride
Pontiac G8 GT
He said...


“We’re in a situation where we have put together, and you guys did it for our administration…President Obama’s administration before this. We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics,” he said.
 

Derekthetree

Well-Known Member
Joined
May 19, 2019
Messages
484
Reaction score
1,195
Points
93
Location
Victoria
Members Ride
Gen-F R8 SV Manual
The fact is that voter fraud was commited, there is a large amount of witensses, hard evidence, video footage, sworn affidavits, etc... plenty enough to at least start an investigation. Why the courts are rejecting the evidence and cases is beyond me.
Because no "evidence" is being shown, purely people claiming it occurred. Independent reviews by DoJ, FBI, even the team of South American country observers found nothing. But some nutjob on youtube/bitchute ( :rolleyes: ) puts a poorly written report on fraud and its obviously true.
  • What does an sworn affidavit really prove? Your willing to go to jail for perjury if found out.
  • Where were the videos taken, and when, and by who?
  • "hard evidence"
Put up or shut up.

Martin A Armstrong is an Economist, he only analyzes data and facts. Here is in a nutshell. The rest is propaganda and biases.
Hmm not heard of him.

*Searches*

"Martin Arthur Armstrong is an American self-taught economic forecaster and convicted felon who spent 11 years in jail for cheating investors out of $700 million and hiding $15 million in assets from regulators "

Oh OK another reliable source then....
 
Top