I like our social welfare system, as it's a great crime reducer and would never like to see it go.
I'd like to see companies operating under the religious 'tax free' umbrella brought into line , the combined tax avoidance is valued at $20-30bil
Companies like sanitarium as it pays no tax and is american owned.
I'd agree with that 100%, some 'churches' are out and out buisnesses for their pastors. Hillsong apparently has the biggest recording studio in the southern hemisphere they use to produce their lucrative musical products. Charities normally don't have the biggest recording studio in the southern hemisphere. It is also difficult to check their books because from what I understand, churches don't have auditing requirements. Here we only have Hillsong as a megachurch (to my knowledge), but over in the states the problem is immense due to higher religiousity and possibly lower economic regulation. "God - Creator, Alpha and Omega, grand mathematician of the universe - really bad with money. Which is why he is always wanting more" as George Carlin put it.....
But.... some religious organisations are genuinely charitable (Salvos, St Vinnies, World Vision etc), providing services for education, healthcare, and homelessness. As such any new tax code would need to make this distinction somehow, otherwise govco would need to fork out $$$ to cover any shortfall in financial support for such services.
My understanding of Reaganomics is that it involves low tax, small govt, low economic regulation for theoretically higher economic growth. I think most here would agree I don't view this favourably for various practical reasons. Social democracy involves very sufficient funding of welfare, public services, anti-racism etc, environmentalism etc to theoretically build an equitable, sustanable society - we can safely say Mr Reaper does not view this very favourably neither, for his own reasons. On the same page now? Or is this still requiring translation to 'Ingrish'? lol