asvpxhughuet
New Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2019
- Messages
- 1
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 1
- Age
- 24
- Location
- Melbourne
- Members Ride
- VE Omega
Hi everyone,
My first post here, I've gotten plenty of answers from others here so I'm hoping someone can help me out with this. I know there has been similar threads before like this one but I thought I could get an updated opinion.
I'm looking to buy a car and have my eye on one for cheap, a 2007 SV6. Only problem is the amount of k's on it. It has done 318xxx km's over it's 12 year lifespan and does have immaculate service history from 0-150,000 but then very minimal after that. I was just wondering what people's opinion was on how many is too many, and that is is not worth it buying a car with 300k + on it because it's lifespan is coming to an end. I have a few cars I've been looking at and am on a budget but is it better value for a car four years newer with 125,000 less kms on it?
Thanks guys I look forward to any responses!
My first post here, I've gotten plenty of answers from others here so I'm hoping someone can help me out with this. I know there has been similar threads before like this one but I thought I could get an updated opinion.
I'm looking to buy a car and have my eye on one for cheap, a 2007 SV6. Only problem is the amount of k's on it. It has done 318xxx km's over it's 12 year lifespan and does have immaculate service history from 0-150,000 but then very minimal after that. I was just wondering what people's opinion was on how many is too many, and that is is not worth it buying a car with 300k + on it because it's lifespan is coming to an end. I have a few cars I've been looking at and am on a budget but is it better value for a car four years newer with 125,000 less kms on it?
Thanks guys I look forward to any responses!