Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

l67 intercooler

Kyle H

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
73
Reaction score
7
Points
8
Location
Sydney
Members Ride
L67 VT Commodore
hey guys ive been wanting to upgrade to a smaller pulley on my l67 and wanting to know if running 11 psi with out intercooling it is okay?

mods list:
pacemaker extractors
2.5 in twin catback exhaust
200 cell high flow cats
mace cai
shaved heads
yella terra rockers (unsure of ratio)
yella terra 87mm (10psi) pulley and snout
 

Phillbert

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
988
Reaction score
1,266
Points
93
Location
Gold Coast
Members Ride
VS L67 Ute, VX SS
Have a look through @peteinoz thread about his L67 VS Ute
He is running a smaller pulley with no intercooler interesting thread...

I would add to your list a lower temp thermostat from MACE.
In general rule you don't want to go smaller than 12 psi without an intercooler due to heat buildup.
 

losh1971

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
22,578
Reaction score
22,288
Points
113
Location
North Tas
Members Ride
VE Series I SS Ute
E85.
 

Kyle H

Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2020
Messages
73
Reaction score
7
Points
8
Location
Sydney
Members Ride
L67 VT Commodore
Have a look through @peteinoz thread about his L67 VS Ute
[/URL]
He is running a smaller pulley with no intercooler interesting thread...

I would add to your list a lower temp thermostat from MACE.
In general rule you don't want to go smaller than 12 psi without an intercooler due to heat buildup.
definitely not going smaller than 12 psi without intercooling it, just wanting to make more power even if its not huge difference from 10 psi. thank you for the help mate
 

Phillbert

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2016
Messages
988
Reaction score
1,266
Points
93
Location
Gold Coast
Members Ride
VS L67 Ute, VX SS
definitely not going smaller than 12 psi without intercooling it, just wanting to make more power even if its not huge difference from 10 psi. thank you for the help mate

With your list above i would just get a bigger Throttle Body and a decent Tune. I think it would make a big difference without breaking the bank too much.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,213
Reaction score
1,785
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Honestly I would be trying to knock the boost down with engine efficiency from here if you're looking for more power.
I would be getting bigger intake valves and a bowl job with a proper Newen CNC seat job. Higgins heads in Melbourne can do the valve work or Rams head porting in Sydney.
Next step would be a cam and move to a stock ratio rocker still from Yella Terra unless yours are stock.

You might drop from 10psi to 8psi and pick up 10% horse power as the blower isn't worked as hard even though it's spinning faster as it's not compressing the air as much so less intake heat.
Those are very conservative figures btw.

Now you can add a smaller pulley and be under 10psi.
 

losh1971

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
22,578
Reaction score
22,288
Points
113
Location
North Tas
Members Ride
VE Series I SS Ute
Can the L67 take bigger valves? The early V6 couldn't as I looked into it.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,213
Reaction score
1,785
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Can the L67 take bigger valves? The early V6 couldn't as I looked into it.

It depends on certain factors. If the exhaust is too close to the intake you have to shrink the exhaust and sink it down into the seat.
Lots of machine shops will just do two bigger vlaves this is why you shouldn't let machine shops touch your heads and use a head porting specialist.
Also if you sink the exhaust vlave you should sink the intake then do some chamber work to smooth the chambers back out. So no it's not just a cut'em bigger and done job it takes a little knowledge and skill to do.
You usually only ever need to increase intake valve size as most heads have too much exhaust valve anyway.
Also sinking the valves will lower compression which isn't such a bad thing really on a forced induction engine which already has shaved heads.
 

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,570
Reaction score
20,322
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
Ecotec/L67 can take marginally bigger valves but the difference isn't much. The last of the ecotec/L67's in the US got slightly larger valves from the factory. See


Machine shops do as you ask as their job isn't specifically to increase performance. Having said that, the machine shop that did my ecotec heads did a 3 angle valve job to blended the seat into the port and because he had to take a bit off the exhaust seats to clean them up he also swept out the chamber to make sure the valves weren't shrouded.

file.php


Ideally those heads only need a little hand blending into the port and cleanup of the short turn radius.

And with the valves fitted where you can see the extra material removed to unshroud the valves in the chambers
file.php


I like him enough to take a set of 304 heads there next and let him work his magic on them.

The other issue with going much smaller than a 3.4" pulley is that you exceed the resolution of the standard MAF. I run a 3.2" pulley and 5% OD balancer and have maxed out the stock MAF just over 5000RPM. Honestly, anything smaller than 3.4" and heat management becomes critical as intake temps rise quickly.
 
Top