- Joined
- Apr 15, 2006
- Messages
- 22,620
- Reaction score
- 20,501
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Sth Auck, NZ
- Members Ride
- HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
If the tolerances are correct at op temp how is it excessive?
It's literally the definition of durability dude. It's damage that had no bearing on the life of the engine or the extra abuse I gave it with boost and why it still runs like a dream today after nearly 20 years and 320k. Any engine that runs is being 'damaged' with every stroke and every rotation. That's why all things eventually degrade and wear out. It's how that degradation relates to operation that defines durability
But are they?
LS motors use hypereutectic alloy pistons, an alloy that expands less with heat than a normal alloy and considerably less than a forged alloy piston. These engines should have less piston to bore clearance than an older style motor with cast alloy pistons and shouldn't make any noise at all. It's a sad state of affairs that Holden/GM has people believing that their lack of quality control leading to some engines slapping like a bitch and others not is acceptable. If it was a true characteristic of these motors than ALL would do it but that is certainly not the case.
My 340,000km V6 engine with failed head gasket that was probably pinged to death on LPG has no marks in the bore like your LS. Just because it runs doesn't mean it's right.
The thing with mechanical items is they can be out of tolerance and still run for years. At my old work there was one part that would wear out reasonably quick, if you replaced the worn component early then you would only need to replace that one part, you could run it for a lot longer on the fucked part (many millions of cycles) and then you would end up replacing much more of the assembly as more parts got damaged. It ran but it doesn't mean it's right.
Piston slap is the domain of high performance engines with forged pistons that require the extra piston to bore clearance for thermal expansion. The stock LS motor is not that even if GM market it as such.
That's why it's called a phenomenon I guess. I mean size and geometry is an obvious influence and we're talking in thousandths, I can't see that lubrication would have any influence. The piston rocks and the skirt bumps the bore. Once expansion occurs tolerances are spot on and it stops. When you compare my stroker to a stock piston it's very obvious why they slap
I personally think all LS slap, it's more a question of if it's audible. I've seen oodles of LS blocks and the majority of bores had the right marks in the right places
So why is it than that your built motor has closer tolerances if the wider tolerances on the factory motor is acceptable?
I suspect you are correct, most of these motors probably have some form of piston slap than isn't auditable but again, just because it does, does that make it right or just poor quality control? The guy that built your stroker would probably agree the factory LS motors have excessive tolerances.