Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

Smoking ban 'trend' in Victoria.

Discussion in 'The Pub' started by lepht93, Nov 21, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Drawnnite

    Drawnnite Obviously Unsensible

    Messages:
    1,427
    Likes Received:
    228
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Location:
    Victoria
    Members Ride:
    2000 Vs Ute
    your right, but id rather see solutions then whinging
    but ad up all that GST and so on, and thats a fair bit, isnt it like a billion dollar business per year. a hit of a few million that is a once off, which saves alot of peoples health is better then the millions it would cost to public health due to implecations of 2nd hand smoke.
    lets graffiti artists paint the walls etc. let them decorate it.

    thats 3 birds one stone.
    Tafe construction, Smoking out of publicish areas, and an area that graffiti that can be allowed.

    as for how they are scattered, im not sure. it would depend on sizes etc

    but like i said, id rather see solutions made then just ban it, and have more people whinge.
     
  2. pMs

    pMs New Member

    Messages:
    0
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2010
    Location:
    Geelong, Victoria
    Members Ride:
    Horse and cart
    The general public still believe that 9/11 was an Al-Qaeda deal. The public will believe what it's told, lol.

    The fact of the matter has already been stated; the government will do all in it's power to appear to be the good guy, but it relies on smokers for the revenue. Hence the increased tax on cigarettes, I believe.

    It's a double edged sword. The government wants you to quit to keep the health neo-Nazis happy, but they don't want you to quit because of the revenue. Who cares? Keep smoking, I say.
     
  3. Stressball

    Stressball Rolling on 4 again :D

    Messages:
    319
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2005
    Location:
    SE QLD
    Members Ride:
    Mitsubishi Triton
    To be fair, aren't you saying that from a smokers perspective? ie, almost unable to even smell cigarette smoke? Most of the smokers I know can't smell it. Everyone around them sure as hell can.

    And to soop; I was sensitive to smoke as a child because of my asthma. Are you trying to tell me that tracy grimshaw and the ACA brigade managed to convince me that smoke is bad for asthmatics before I watched anything other than cartoons? Just because you don't understand it, does not mean it is not true. You would have heard about people dying very quickly from smoke inhalation. In the process, they cough and splutter a lot. Why? Because they are inhaling smoke. Before you say it's because they aren't breathing oxygen in, that's not true. Yes, that would kill them, but it doesn't close their airways. Smoke agitates the airways in large amounts in most, if not all people. Asthmatics are even more sensitive, and less smoke can trigger the airways to tighten.

    If you still refuse to consider the possiblity that smoke can trigger asthma, then that's your choice. I will not be posting on the subject again as I know for a fact that it can trigger it, to different extents in different people.
     
  4. lepht93

    lepht93 Well, you're wrong.

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Eastern Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    VP Commodore Executive
    Smoking cured my asthma, even my doctor, as much as eh tells me i should quit, told me this.
    Having an asthmatic trigger in a small population still doesn't weigh against having bad quality public infrastructure from banning/mass reduction in cigarette sales, Im simply stating a fact, not being an ass.
    and even before I started smoking, I still preferred sitting near a smoker than a fat person, and yes, I had asthma then too.
    To be fair, aren't you saying all of this from a non smokers perspective (rhetorical, no need to answer that.)
     
  5. soop

    soop Banned

    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Members Ride:
    2003 SS Commodore Series II
    That's a matter of opinion. Sitting behind a diesel bus in peak hour... Don't tell me they don't stink.
     
  6. CSP

    CSP Banned

    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Location:
    Canberra
    Members Ride:
    my car
    pfffft... Julie has it spot on and the smokers that whinge about being addicted, you can choose to stop. It's not rocket science. It's a CHOICE YOU HAVE. Your body doesn't smoke cigarettes on its own. My parents went from being pack a day (or MORE!) smokers to nothing overnight (literally) after they both decided it was quite simply the most disgusting and un-healthy thing any human CHOOSES to do. Not to mention costing a fortune.

    Regardless of what ANYONE says, smoking is quite simply one of the stupidest things in the world. There is nothing positive that comes from it AT ALL.

    As for the comments regarding taxes, the medical costs incurred by the government treating smoking caused/related illness is FAR MORE than the taxes the government collects from the sale of cigarettes.

    So, bottom line, IF YOU'RE A SMOKER, KILL YOURSELF IN THE PRIVACY OF YOUR OWN HOME.

    /end thread
     
  7. soop

    soop Banned

    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Members Ride:
    2003 SS Commodore Series II
    Eh, the fact is. Its a personal choice, the smoker chooses to smoke, you can choose to up and leave.

    If we banned everything because someone else doesn't like it everything would be illegal.
     
  8. minux

    minux Infidel Bear

    Messages:
    6,927
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    300rwkw FG G6ET/Specialized Tarmac SL4
    CSP, if smokers should only smoke in their home, then drivers should only emit their emissions in their shed. What comes out of cars is much worse, yet it is ok?

    If people wish to smoke that is their choice, if you sit near where someone is smoking MOVE that is your choice, easier than whinging about smokers in the first place.

    I love how many here are against nanny state laws by government, yet are quite happy for nanny state laws in this instance.
     
  9. Julie

    Julie moderator- for now anyway

    Messages:
    1,671
    Likes Received:
    108
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2004
    Location:
    Western Sydney, NSW
    Members Ride:
    Blown VT Calais 355 + SC VY V6
    If thats the attitude then why not if I or anyone else feels like taking a **** in the middle of a shopping centre why don't we do it? It stinks, its unhygenic, its messy other people don't like it but #### them hey I have every right to **** where I please. If people don't like it they can up and leave :)
     
  10. minux

    minux Infidel Bear

    Messages:
    6,927
    Likes Received:
    231
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2005
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    300rwkw FG G6ET/Specialized Tarmac SL4
    Because shitting in public is not socially accepted in Australia. Got to Malaysia, Bala, Indonesia etc and you can do that.
     
  11. AirStrike

    AirStrike Administrator Staff Member

    Messages:
    8,158
    Likes Received:
    97
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2003
    Location:
    Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    91' VN SS
    HAHA! Game, set and match!
     
  12. lepht93

    lepht93 Well, you're wrong.

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Eastern Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    VP Commodore Executive
    well actually, no, you dont. Public defecation, as with urination, is illegal.
    Exactly as Minux said, move, dont whinge. If I'm trying to enjoy a cigarette, legally, and you don't like the smoke smell, then keep walking.
    and I will continue to use the tax argument because it is sound. I pay far more tax daily than a non smoker in the same demographic, so where is the logic in making me suffer the consequences because the smell is a little bit of a bother to someone for 2 seconds of the 86,400 seconds of their day. I really would like to see how you anti smokers fare in Australia if we didn't have cigarettes with such a large tax.
    The government doesn't pay for operations? Last time I was hospitalised, I had to pay the full amount, and no, I dont have private health insurace.
    Once the brain is addicted, it is addicted for life, nicotine addiction never reverses. You can tell someone how stupid they are for it, but until they are ready to quit, they will continually fail. Hey, I used to take the same one sided stance against smokers before I smoked, and I am against people taking it up, it was a stupid mistake, but now I realise the difficulty in quitting, it doesn't make me any less of a person, I choose to continue. It is 100% my choice.

    "As for the comments regarding taxes, the medical costs incurred by the government treating smoking caused/related illness is FAR MORE than the taxes the government collects from the sale of cigarettes." - Give me a reference, and if its sound, Ill stop using that point.
    In pure ratio, car emissions are far worse than cigarette smoke, and with an hour outside daily probably surpasses a woft of smoke from a cigarette.
    It only effects me as I do not smoke in enclosed areas or long enough around any single person to pose any health threat. However, all of you outt heir with minispool diffs, or choose to buy a car without ESC or ABS, in a purely second hand view, you put the public at FAR GREATER risk than a person smoking at a cafe.

    50% of people who continue to smoke til death will die from smoking related or contributed illness, if I dont die from smoking ill die from something else, but you wont see a single health effect from my second hand smoke. Last time i checked, there is a 100% death rate amongst humans anyway. Its life, why take it so seriously, nobody gets out alive.
     
  13. soop

    soop Banned

    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Members Ride:
    2003 SS Commodore Series II
    No, no its not.
    Totally agree Minux.
     
  14. lepht93

    lepht93 Well, you're wrong.

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Eastern Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    VP Commodore Executive
    Not only that its socially unacceptable (its only a matter of time before someone says the same about smoking). Its plain illegal and always has been.
     
  15. soop

    soop Banned

    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Members Ride:
    2003 SS Commodore Series II
    Fact is, the only reason its not socially acceptable any more is because the media has demonised it.
    It can cause cancer... So can going to the beach but we still beg tourists to do that.

    The argument that you get nothing out of it is moot. It's not up to someone else to decide what I benefit from (I don't smoke once again). If someone likes smoking go for it. If I have a problem, I have two legs.
     
  16. toey@carfx

    toey@carfx Detailing Junkie

    Messages:
    549
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Joined:
    Nov 18, 2010
    Location:
    cobar
    Members Ride:
    2007 wm caprice
    i personally dont smoke and beleave these laws are a set forward. i can handle being around smokers, many of my mates smoke. these guys are kind enough to move down wind of me. i have never asked them to do it but they do it anyway. thats called being considerate. sure smokeing in pubs and clubs makes the place stink and it was great when it was banned inside, i still go outside with my mate when they go for a smoke because we are there as a group and in the open air its ok.

    but there are only time it bothers me is when i am eating. i dont care who you are or what your story is, food and smoking do not go together.PERIOD.

    one thing that lepht93 has left out when saying all the great tax benifits to our ecconomy due to smoker. he forgot to mention the drag on the public health system with the smoking induced illnesses, and no not just cancer because that can be linked to everything although it does increase your chances, but respiratory dissease, heart dissease to name a few. in the grand scheme of things id be happy to have all smokes banned and have an increase in income tax.

    there is my 10c worth
     
  17. CSP

    CSP Banned

    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Location:
    Canberra
    Members Ride:
    my car
    If I have a problem, the smoker has a problem............ and they better be ready for it! And there's always plenty of support from people nearby when I tell them to gtfo and so far not a single one of the dirty bastards has kept smoking (or if they do they leave).

    If they're there before me (cafe etc) I just go somewhere else. But if I'm there first - that's THEIR problem, not mine (or anyone else already enjoying a smoke free environment).
     
  18. soop

    soop Banned

    Messages:
    3,847
    Likes Received:
    58
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2008
    Location:
    Smithton, Tasmania.
    Members Ride:
    2003 SS Commodore Series II
    Problem is, if you ban smoking because its bad for your health, then why not ban Alcohol because it's linked to so much violence and other health problems?
    You don't gain anything from alcohol either, and if you walk past a pissed wanker at 3am in the morning its almost 50/50 as to whether or not you get in a punch on.

    But then, no one whinges about Alcohol. And the very few that do, get crucified.

    LOL, go troll somewhere else, it doesn't work here anymore! :p
     
  19. CSP

    CSP Banned

    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2007
    Location:
    Canberra
    Members Ride:
    my car
    That's not trolling. It's voicing my opinion and explaining how I react.
     
  20. lepht93

    lepht93 Well, you're wrong.

    Messages:
    173
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2010
    Location:
    Eastern Melbourne
    Members Ride:
    VP Commodore Executive
    are you happy with labours 35% flat tax on people who earn over 35,000? it only becomes beneficial if you earn over 180,000$. and looks around the same to cover a smoking ban deficit.
    and toey, read my posts, i definitely have mentioned. medicare simply gives rebates, they certainly don't foot the bill for every smokers illnesses, and that certainly does not completely cover the taxes going into the economy from smokers, it would probably be about 5%. The health system, here in victoria anyway, is abysmal. The money is no more beneficial to me than anyone else who pays less tax than I do from not smoking. Go enjoy a pothole free road. Preferably spool free. A lot of people who go into hospital can be to blame for their ailments. Broken leg from bike riding? Dont ride a bike. Skin cancer from too much sunbaking, dont sunbake. Cold from being on a crowded train with people spluttering their sicknesses, dont catch a train. Car accident from talking on phone, dont talk on phone. Heart attack from progressive obesity, dont be fat. Blame Blame Blame yet smokers are bad. From the substantial tax on cigarettes I think ANY person smoking about 3 packs a week for 10 years has definitely paid for their operations IF EVER required, and also footed the bill for the aforementioned problems people show up with in hospital, which probablt 50% of the time were preventable.

    Get my point? The 'youre in hospital for your own fault' doesnt work, because near half of people in hospital for whatever reason probably could have prevented whatever their problem was. Yet, who pays for it? (Themselves, and medicare) yep, taxpayer.
    Get it?

    I'm about to go smoke my 10c worth.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page