monstar
Naturally as-pirated
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2016
- Messages
- 2,476
- Reaction score
- 1,697
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 56
- Location
- depths of Hays Inlet
- Website
- facebook.com
- Members Ride
- Peugeot 207 GTi
Nah, thermal efficiency of 6.2 engine vs 6.0 (without AFM mode) is marginally better mainly due to cam profile. Swap cams and same same, hardly measurable: The much advertised material difference in bore size is (if you break THAT fundamental difference down) a mozzy’s old fella closer to ideal and raises CR a smidge. So indicated thermal efficiency Stock 6.2 vs 6.0 before AFM is inconsequential but LS3 is better, not worse.Holden told me that the LS3 V8, needs substantial cooling upgrades compared to the 6.0 litre, for instance the opening in the front bar is larger, bonnet vents, and lack of engine shielding.
In other words that jive was sales-speak, bumper revision has everything to do with latest coloured Asics, man-buns and auto-fashion, nothing to do with less thermal efficiency. This is evidenced by specific consumption of 6.2 being marginally less (excluding AFM operation).
Bonnet and side vents are a spin off from the 1LE program for Camaro which at its core is about stability not entropy. Worth noting 1LE has more underbody.
Front undertray was present on earlier Zeta LS3, retained in the US, dropped on VF through cost saving, like the rest of the infill panels. Worth noting these cost savings meant VF was significantly cheaper than VEII, meant introducing the consolidated GM 6.2 donk was “free”, previously sold at a premium on G8 back in 2008.
FWIW I would buy these bits and all infill ASAP as is gonna be incredible and complicated to explain why some models didn’t get the full dress in years to come when these bits are rare as hens teeth.
Last edited: