Troy711
Retired Old Fart
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2003
- Messages
- 7,692
- Reaction score
- 167
- Points
- 63
- Location
- Canberra, ACT
- Website
- forums.justcommodores.com.au
- Members Ride
- 2011 Mitsubishi Pajero GLS
CSP is right about each car being responsible for each collision in a pile up.... but he's forgeting the UNLESS IT CAN BE PROVEN THEY ARENT AT FAULT part.
Its pretty obvious the two cars in front were stationary at the time of the accident (both drivers will attest that they were waiting at the intersection). Being that both cars arent moving, they are basically 'parked'.... and any car that hits one and causes it to move into another car, is the one at fault!
Pretty straight forward.
It's not just a matter of who collided with who.... its why.
I've just been through the same thing with AAMI when my Mrs was rear ended. We received a letter of demand for repairs to the car she was pushed into even though she was stationary and the car behind pushed her. I basically called AAMI (after about 8 beers) and said that they can GGF'ed and that we were not paying. I explained it again (even though they have a copy of the police report) and now it's case closed.