VR Acceleration claimed 9.3secs???

[Torquen]

VT are frigin slow, period. i have yet 2 be beatin by one. there first gear stays with the VS and then they drop right of. iv gone to 145km/h against a VT and i was in front by a good 3 car lenghts befor i backed of.

 

[holden007]

Ye true VT's are slow, I guess the weight is letting it down, I reckon the VY's not bad but.

 

[1991_Vn2nV]

http://forums.justcommodores.com.au/showthread.php?t=38400

Check this thread in the VN-VP section, thanks for the real results greenfoam.

They are simulation times... Notice none of the cars on that list actually do those times in real life. Also the weight is wrong for the VR there as the weight is actually 1362kg for an exec model kerb weight.

I've seen a VR with a 2.5" cat back exhaust and 160k on the clock drag a stock as VP in **** condition with alot more k's and the VP beat it quite convincingly. Remember the VS Commodore does 0-100 in the high 8's... And thats with 147kw...

 

[1991_Vn2nV]

VR Executive V6 auto: 0-100km/h: 9.3s (from Wheels Sept 93)
400m: 16.8s
60-90km/h: 3.4s
80-100km/h: 4.3s
0-80km/h: 5.0s

Its the 80-100 time that hurts the VR's acceleration.