48-215
Member
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2021
- Messages
- 25
- Reaction score
- 80
- Points
- 13
- Location
- Sunshine Coast
- Members Ride
- Pajerodore
So if a US conglomerate, and an OS competitor got together under the banner of an organisation to collude on prices set in Aus, theres nothing Australian Law can do because that organisation is not the member entities?I’ll say it again even though it won’t sink in. OPEC as an entity does not sell oil in Australia, hence they are not subject to Australian laws.
That’s a pretty big distinction (when you say there isn’t one) from your initial point that Australian law should prevent them from being a cartel.
So Telstra, and Vodafone could **** off to NZ, or Fiji and collude on prices under the label of an organisation called FUCKEM, and theres nothing Australian laws could do to them? You would have to wonder why any business would comply with Australian law. Seriously, youre delusional. Our governments just allow it, are bought and paid for. OPEC is the evidence of the collusion of the States in question, and or companies that exist therein and act in compliance with OPECs meetings. OPEC can make whatever lunch decision it likes Its well within the power of the Australian government to ban them trading here for reasons of collusion and anti competitive behaviour.
Someone needs to tell Microsoft, Amazon and Google to form a cartel and tell the Australian Government to FUCKEMTOO.
It wont sink in because youre being obtuse trying to win yourself tonights internet on semantics.
Psst, if OPEC was now OPEC+, then the name OPEC would be retired. Look it up, OPEC, no plus, still exists. OPEC+ is described as a loose alliance between NON OPEC countries and OPEC.Russia sits at the same table with OPEC members and are themselves part of OPEC+. The only distinction between them being a plus sign!
They didn’t call it OPEC+ because they like to catch up and have a chat about the latest cross stitch patterns! It’s called OPEC+ because it does exactly the same shite that the regular OPEC does!
I sat at the same table as my parents. Didnt mean I owned their car.
Last edited: