Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

JC Political Thread - For All Things Political Part 2

the_boozer

no more VK
Joined
Nov 7, 2009
Messages
1,512
Reaction score
749
Points
113
Age
51
Location
Shitsville Morwell
Members Ride
hilux

AirStrike

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2003
Messages
8,197
Reaction score
1,245
Points
113
Age
38
Location
Melbourne
Members Ride
91' VN SS
To be fair, he did say by 2025.

BUT.....given how prices have increased since he made that promise, I don't like our chances of power costs being $275 cheaper than at that time.
By time the $275 discount roles around we’ll be $500 worse off than when the promise was made :D
 

J_D 2.0

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 20, 2020
Messages
2,965
Reaction score
6,996
Points
113
Location
Ipswich
Members Ride
2009 VE SSV M6 on LPG and 2022 Kawasaki Z650L
Gee all these cheap renewables are really making prices fall.

https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article...lians-according-to-energy-regulator/k8g00jheg

I await the mental gymnastics to try and blame capitalism and big companies.

Well fossil fuel prices going ballistic due to the Ukraine war was a lot of the reason that prices increased in the first place.

It’s not mental gymnastics to suggest that more energy that we are firmly in control of (renewables) and has no ongoing fuel cost is better that paying whatever the oil/gas/coal price happens to be today, usually to some foreign dictator.

Also you can’t arbitrage wind turbines and solar panels. Once they are installed all the energy stays here and can’t just be whisked off overseas to the highest bidder like what happens with our LNG.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,798
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Well fossil fuel prices going ballistic due to the Ukraine war was a lot of the reason that prices increased in the first place.

It’s not mental gymnastics to suggest that more energy that we are firmly in control of (renewables) and has no ongoing fuel cost is better that paying whatever the oil/gas/coal price happens to be today, usually to some foreign dictator.

Also you can’t arbitrage wind turbines and solar panels. Once they are installed all the energy stays here and can’t just be whisked off overseas to the highest bidder like what happens with our LNG.

The prices didn't go crazy.

Also, we have some of the world's largest coal deposits in our own country.

Try again.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,798
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...gencost-report-nuclear-energy-renewables-cost

But the CSIRO haven't taken cost blow outs into account.
The Snowy 2 project was meant to cost $2,000,000,000 it's now at $12,000,000,000. So what is the point of making a biased report if in 5 years all the costs will just blow out.
Not to mention the 28,000km of transmission lines not in the report that will also cost blow out like Snowy 2.
 

UTE042_NZ

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2017
Messages
734
Reaction score
3,901
Points
93
Location
New Zealand
Members Ride
MY17 Magnum Ute
"This morning, his lawyers informed the New York Court that Trump was unable to secure a roughly half-billion dollar bond in order to appeal his civil fraud case. This means Attorney General Letitia James could seek to freeze bank accounts and seize his marquee properties."

Trump not as rich as claimed

Also, up against some of his own words.

 
Last edited:

chrisp

Well-Known Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2009
Messages
1,877
Reaction score
5,008
Points
113
Location
Melbourne Victoria
Members Ride
VF2 MY16 SS Redline Sportwagon
https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...gencost-report-nuclear-energy-renewables-cost

But the CSIRO haven't taken cost blow outs into account.
The Snowy 2 project was meant to cost $2,000,000,000 it's now at $12,000,000,000. So what is the point of making a biased report if in 5 years all the costs will just blow out.
Not to mention the 28,000km of transmission lines not in the report that will also cost blow out like Snowy 2.

Do you reckon that nuclear is immune to ’cost blow outs’? Lot’s of major projects run over cost, and time, so the comparative cost basis in the report still stands.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,798
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Do you reckon that nuclear is immune to ’cost blow outs’? Lot’s of major projects run over cost, and time, so the comparative cost basis in the report still stands.

Yes but unlike Snowy 2 pumped hydro and offshore wind farms, nuclear energy is a tried and tested method of power generation, with over 70 years of operation behind it.
 

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,638
Reaction score
20,533
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
The prices didn't go crazy.

Also, we have some of the world's largest coal deposits in our own country.

Try again.

Just because you have coal produced locally doesn't mean it makes it cheap. Coal, oil, petrol/diesel are all traded on commodity markets which tend to dictate prices.

Ukraine has hit 12 Russian oil refineries and the last few days, their capacity to produce petroleum products is taking a real hit and it will have a flow on effect on the world markets.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.th...gencost-report-nuclear-energy-renewables-cost

But the CSIRO haven't taken cost blow outs into account.
The Snowy 2 project was meant to cost $2,000,000,000 it's now at $12,000,000,000. So what is the point of making a biased report if in 5 years all the costs will just blow out.
Not to mention the 28,000km of transmission lines not in the report that will also cost blow out like Snowy 2.

And the same thing will happen with anything they try to built, solar, wind, nuclear, coal.....
 
Top