DJ Majah said:We have new technologies, although not perfected yet, which are able to produce zero emissions. By not perfected yet, I mean they either divert emissions somewhere else as you said, or they are currently too expensive to produce.
My friends, I introduce the Perendev motor:
http://www.americanantigravity.com/perendev.shtml
And if breaking the laws of thermodynamics isn't your thing:
http://www.theaircar.com/
DJ Majah said:Q. Why didnt John 'Moneybags' Howard sign the Kyoto protocol?
A. Because it would cost too much.
Partly. Mostly it was because he's right up George W. 'Oil Baron' Bush's backside.
DJ Majah said:I do drive a Commodore, but my 3.8 will still get 500ks to a tank. And when a hydrogen car is available I will be the first to throw away the keys to the Commodore and buy one.
By the time you can buy one, the oil companies will have figured out a way to make Hydrogen engines as inefficient as petrol power. I've heard that one litre of hydrogen contains enough potential energy to drive a car for 3,000km. I can't see them releasing that sort of technology to the public any time soon.
Anyone remember the E-Commodore?? What happened to it?? Why didn't it go into production??
Answer: Someone doesn't want you driving a car which consumes one-third of the petrol you currently use.