Stock 2005 Falcon BA XT MK II vs Stock 1998 Commodore VT S-PAC Supercharged V6

[Sandrelli0]

Stock 2005 Falcon BA XT MK II vs Stock 1998 Commodore VT S-PAC Supercharged V6

Both with their 4-Speed autos

Will be using Power Mode in the Commodore and Sports Mode in the Falcon

Stock Specs

Commodore
---
Power 171kW @ 5200rpm
Torque 375Nm @ 3000rpm

Kerb Weight (kg) 1646
Tare Mass (kg) 1599


Falcon
---
Power 182kW @ 5000rpm
Torque 380Nm @ 3250rpm

Kerb Weight (kg) 1648
Tare Mass (kg) 1628

Who do you reckon would win up too. 80, 100, and 160

The Factory 0-100 for the Falcon is said to be 7.7 and the commodore 7.2

 

[some_guy]

Will be using Power Mode in the Commodore and Sports Mode in the Falcon

Quoted for the lols

How are we ever going to know the outcome?

The falcon has 7years less life on it.

I say good luck to you.

 

[Kiddo]

Hurr durr i dunno maybe................who cares.....

 

[Big-Al]

who gives a ####?

 

[AirStrike]

Lol at racing pov packs.
Also lol at the L67, supercharged and has less torque.

 

[jason_85]

the 'power mode' doesnt open up a box that contains an extra 100kw when pressed...

 

[AirStrike]

My car at the drags was quicker left in drive then sports mode.

 

[Kiddo]

My car at the drags was quicker left in drive then sports mode.

Strange, mine gained four tenths :s

 

[AirStrike]

Because no turbo

 

[someguy360]

lol racing pov pack 6 bangers

Thats cute