Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.

New Posts Contact us

Just Commodores Forum Community

It takes just a moment to join our fantastic community

Register

304 Stock intake limitations

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,674
Reaction score
20,668
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
Stock intake with the front cut off and modified for a bigger TB.

The banana's with the top cut off and a plenum welded on with twin TB's is the Walker manifold.
7f_1_b-jpg.29366
 

gtrboyy

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2006
Messages
4,326
Reaction score
2,836
Points
113
Members Ride
vt ss & lc gtr
They chop elbow section off where accelerator cable bracket bolts to & weld in new section with larger opening & 90mm throttle body(?) looked factory at first glance.

Similar results with ls1 throttle body & new flange but better results taking elbow out & having throttle body facing forward...whatever you do will be some sort of limitation with bananas
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,799
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
I measured the elbow and it's 70mm at the narrowest point like I mentioned earlier my calculations suggest the runners will never need more than 70mm of TB.
 

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,674
Reaction score
20,668
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
Theoretical calculations are great but they don't trump real world experience and there are plenty of people who have thrown a lot of money at these manifolds chasing small gains.

The Starr manifold was popular on 215i cars and gave a good improvement on the stroker motors.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,799
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
Theoretical calculations are great but they don't trump real world experience and there are plenty of people who have thrown a lot of money at these manifolds chasing small gains.

The Starr manifold was popular on 215i cars and gave a good improvement on the stroker motors.

The calculations are based off flow tested TB's from the list I linked, I'll link it again.

https://accufabracing.com/cfm-air-flow
these guy's are one of the biggest and most well renowned engine builders in the US btw.
 

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,674
Reaction score
20,668
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
That's really nice, how much experience do those guys have with the 304 banana's manifold?
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,799
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
That's really nice, how much experience do those guys have with the 304 banana's manifold?

If a 70mm TB can flow enough air to make 550 to 600hp how exactly is it a restriction?
 

Immortality

Can't live without smoky bacon!
Staff member
Joined
Apr 15, 2006
Messages
22,674
Reaction score
20,668
Points
113
Location
Sth Auck, NZ
Members Ride
HSV VS Senator, VX Calais II L67
If a 70mm TB can flow enough air to make 550 to 600hp how exactly is it a restriction?

You can't take a single component as a guide to what an engine will make, you need to consider the entire intake system from filter to intake valve.

But what do I know, I can only tell you what I have seen.

If you want to prove what has been achieved before is wrong go right ahead, I await your results eagerly.
 

shane_3800

Well-Known Member
Joined
Aug 13, 2011
Messages
4,223
Reaction score
1,799
Points
113
Age
35
Location
places
Members Ride
vr commo
You can't take a single component as a guide to what an engine will make, you need to consider the entire intake system from filter to intake valve.

But what do I know, I can only tell you what I have seen.

If you want to prove what has been achieved before is wrong go right ahead, I await your results eagerly.

What I'm trying to alude to is if the intake runners are the biggest restriction there's not much point in increasing the TB size.
I bet if the plenum was enlarged with a 70mm TB it would out perform the Starr manifold.
My theory is that the Starr simply is slowing the air speed at the plenum entrance helping the first two runners.
 

losh1971

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jan 17, 2010
Messages
22,776
Reaction score
22,695
Points
113
Location
North Tas
Members Ride
VE Series I SS Ute
What I'm trying to alude to is if the intake runners are the biggest restriction there's not much point in increasing the TB size.
I bet if the plenum was enlarged with a 70mm TB it would out perform the Starr manifold.
My theory is that the Starr simply is slowing the air speed at the plenum entrance helping the first two runners.
Less talk, more action..... Keen to see dyno results before and after.
 
Top