oh really? please provide said information
Like I said, there will always be skeptics.
Please feel free to Google, this is a topic of interest to plenty of people and there is no point arguing with those who choose to disagree. Its like religion and politics, highly polarized.
The arguments supporting both the for and against are all available online and you are free to decide for yourself which side of the debate you support.
Of course you are aware that there is a mass of data on the subject, and I could, if I was anal enough, probably create a 4 page post with only links to said data... you probably wouldn't read more than half of the first link anyway (that's not a criticism, I would probably be the same) so there is hardly any point.
The reason neither I or you would read much of the linked evidence is that those links will invariably be biased towards our own views.. in your case, you are hardly likely to present evidence that contradicts your cause and in my case, evidence contradicting my cause has not been found, so neither am I. Hence the term 'Theory of Climate Change' as opposed to 'Hypothesis of Climate Change'. Science accepts a Theory as a likely fact unless/until someone disproves it. No-one has.
I prefer to follow the overwhelmingly supported view of modern science, but that's just me.
