337kw VZ Alloytec - Turbo/E85

[SUP3RST4R_DJ]

hey bud this is sweet

ive been half thinking about this on my vz ute rather then going down the get a v8 route like everyone else, ive also emailed pro flow about their kit

just a couple questions, does the cpr6 really make that much of a difference with the turbo?

and what would it be like running it on 98 octane? obviosuly not as high of a power figure but a little easier fuel for me to buy and what sprta power could they get up to on that?

another thing bothering me is that my engine has just ticked 110000 and im worried doing this will either dramatically shorten the engine life more or it just wont be worth it for the life of the engine?

and what sort of exhaust do you have?

sorry to annoy with all the questions but again a very sweet result for the alloytec, im glad someone is having a crack at turbo on them

 

[richardpalinkas]

I heard the cpr6 is bad for forced induction

 

[Bryce_82]

I heard the cpr6 is bad for forced induction

Sorry to revive a very dead thread, but how exactly can a better flowing inlet manifold be worse for a boosted application?
That's exactly what you want when you add forced induction, better flow..

 

[xSV666x]

Lol nice first post u would think a cpr6 is good for FI and if he is pushing over 330RWKW with one and a aftermarket Ecu, turbo + E85 the results seem to speak for them selfs here, I'd like to know around how much did it all cost to be making that power from a 175 alloytec and also if its lasted, since no1 has asked lol

 

[akarshmalikal]

Hey Mate... thats jst awesome, May i know how much u spend and are u using intercooler ???

Upload some pics dude

 

[richardpalinkas]

The reason I heard its not very good is because it was tested with and without a cpr6 on a raptor charged sv6 a few years ago. The small gains made offset the price. Less restriction does not equate to larger volume, hence why turbo cars have small primary pipes to the turbo, to increase velocity. More volume means the charger has to fill that space instead of filling the combustion chamber. Example, if you are filling up 2 tyres, one is a large volume 4x4 tyre, the other a small passenger car tyre half the volume, using the same air compressor, which will fill to 40psi quicker?

 

[Kiddo]

The reason I heard its not very good is because it was tested with and without a cpr6 on a raptor charged sv6 a few years ago. The small gains made offset the price. Less restriction does not equate to larger volume, hence why turbo cars have small primary pipes to the turbo, to increase velocity. More volume means the charger has to fill that space instead of filling the combustion chamber. Example, if you are filling up 2 tyres, one is a large volume 4x4 tyre, the other a small passenger car tyre half the volume, using the same air compressor, which will fill to 40psi quicker?

Also, the CPR6 is only an improvement at very high rpms. Depending on how its setup, it may actually hinder performance by increasing the turbo lag.