Skylarking
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 3, 2018
- Messages
- 10,114
- Reaction score
- 10,562
- Points
- 113
- Age
- 123
- Location
- Downunder
- Members Ride
- Commodore Motorsport Edition
The whole idea of fines based on income is that a $400? speeding fine when one is on $1300/f job seekers really hurts them disproportionately as compared to the average employee.... A $400? speeding fine for someone earning $200k isnt even a blip on their radar...
I’ve always felt that if someone behaves in a dangerous manner on our shared roads, their license should be cancelled since they are behaving dangerously.... No fines, just a loss of their time to resit the test and if they pass they’re back to P’s... Loose their licence again in 12 month period and they again loose their license but now have to wait a bit before you can sit your test... the “bit“ they have to wait gets longer each time they behave dangerously and only resets after a 24 month clean driving period. It’s probation in the true sense.
Whether the wealthy are living of trusts, etc, won’t matter so much... though I guess they can afford to be driven everywhere so they don’t really need a licence
I’ve always felt that if someone behaves in a dangerous manner on our shared roads, their license should be cancelled since they are behaving dangerously.... No fines, just a loss of their time to resit the test and if they pass they’re back to P’s... Loose their licence again in 12 month period and they again loose their license but now have to wait a bit before you can sit your test... the “bit“ they have to wait gets longer each time they behave dangerously and only resets after a 24 month clean driving period. It’s probation in the true sense.
Whether the wealthy are living of trusts, etc, won’t matter so much... though I guess they can afford to be driven everywhere so they don’t really need a licence