VTLS1
Member
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2010
- Messages
- 378
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 18
- Location
- IPSWICH
- Members Ride
- VT S2 LS1 -VX S2 SS LS1
Answer 1:The desk clerk received $30 minus $5, that is,
$25; the bellhop kept $2; that is altogether $27 on one side of
the ledger. On the other side are the expenses of the guest,
namely $30 minus $3, also equalling $27. So there is no deficit
from the bookkeeper's angle, and no dollar is missing. Of
course, if you mix up receipts and expenses and add the guest's
expenses of $27 to the dishonest bellhop's profit of $2, you end
up with a sum of $29, and a misleading question.
Answer 2:The dealer was right. The car that brought him a 25 per cent
profit cost him $600 (because 600 + 25% = 750). The other car on
which he lost 25 per cent cost him $1,000 (because 1,000 - 25% =
750). So the dealer paid a total of $1,600 for two cars which he sold
for $1,500, causing him a loss of $100.
$25; the bellhop kept $2; that is altogether $27 on one side of
the ledger. On the other side are the expenses of the guest,
namely $30 minus $3, also equalling $27. So there is no deficit
from the bookkeeper's angle, and no dollar is missing. Of
course, if you mix up receipts and expenses and add the guest's
expenses of $27 to the dishonest bellhop's profit of $2, you end
up with a sum of $29, and a misleading question.
Answer 2:The dealer was right. The car that brought him a 25 per cent
profit cost him $600 (because 600 + 25% = 750). The other car on
which he lost 25 per cent cost him $1,000 (because 1,000 - 25% =
750). So the dealer paid a total of $1,600 for two cars which he sold
for $1,500, causing him a loss of $100.