Welcome to Just Commodores, a site specifically designed for all people who share the same passion as yourself.
don't tell lies Immortality, NZ is 44% renewable energy.
Why should superannuation paid on maternity leave be means tested?All sides of politics are controlled by the same corporate interests & lobbyists, but at least some of the time progressives help people who need it instead of those who don't. For example, lifting the dole & raising minimum wages to match inflation. Australian Labor just doubled funding to schools in the Northern Territory, which is something the other side would never have thought of doing. Superannuation on paid parental leave should have been income/means tested, but the backlash would be absolutely ridiculous.
These are small measures, but compared to the 9 years of attacking anyone the Libs didn't see as worthy, it's a move in the right direction.
They don’t even need to use concrete at all now provided the ground is stable enough.
https://www.post-anchors.com/postanchors/ground-screw.html
Yes I've seen those advertised here in NZ but not had a good look at the details. I think I saw it been used for a deck construction.
Stop speaking about shite you know nothing about. Pumped hydro has a round trip efficiency of around 80%.
Stop speaking about shite you know nothing about. New Zealand’s grid is about 82% renewables.
https://www.energyresources.org.nz/oil-and-gas-new-zealand/our-energy-mix/
https://www.energyresources.org.nz/oil-and-gas-new-zealand/our-energy-mix/
Maybe SMRs are a good option, too bad they don’t actually exist at this point in time. Nuclear is hideously expensive but realistically if we cant store sufficient power with pumped hydro etc then nuclear at the margins might be a viable backup solution for when the sun doesn’t blow and the wind doesn’t shine.
That being said it would require government subsidies or intervention in the energy market, possibly using a payment mechanism for despatchable power that goes from non-firmed renewables to the nuclear power plants.
The market isn’t going to do nuclear purely because of the capex costs and long lead time to build a nuclear power plant. You’re tying up billions in capital for a decade or more before you even generate your first electron.
You mean like the Victorian Labour Government who didn't dig deep enough to discover contaminated soil when estimating the cost of the West Gate tunnel project/debacle?
Yeah, they were so much smarter than the average Joe.
Yes, You said it above. I recommend you take your own advice and stop talking about shite you know nothing about. Russia and China have SMR's in operation
Every day we wait is another day of blackouts and under supply at the other end of the time line.
So you would be happy buying an SMR from China or Russia? They don’t count because autocratic regimes can do whatever they like to make stuff like SMRs happen.
Here in the west it’s not been going so well with the only company that was somewhat close to market getting a reality check from their initial customers backing out of the project.
SMRs might get up eventually but the LNP are portraying it as if there are turnkey reactors ready to go and we just need to get on with it, nothing could be further from the truth.
https://www.theguardian.com/austral...ition-as-future-cancelled-due-to-rising-costs
Well not if we keep peeking gas plants and coal plants in operation until the void is filled. We need to move in the direction of renewable energy and progressively change over but the LNP doesn’t want to move at all and nuclear is just a delaying tactic to keep coal in operation longer.
If nuclear was such a good idea then why did we hear nothing about it when they were in power? A cynical person would suggest that maybe it’s just something to bash Labor over the head with.